PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
EL4Z.DE vs. SC0H.DE
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

EL4Z.DE vs. SC0H.DE - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a €10,000 investment in Deka MSCI USA UCITS ETF (EL4Z.DE) and Invesco MSCI USA UCITS ETF (SC0H.DE). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

The year-to-date returns for both investments are quite close, with EL4Z.DE having a 11.05% return and SC0H.DE slightly higher at 11.30%. Both investments have delivered pretty close results over the past 10 years, with EL4Z.DE having a 14.39% annualized return and SC0H.DE not far ahead at 15.07%.


EL4Z.DE

1D
-0.11%
1M
4.50%
YTD
11.05%
6M
10.47%
1Y
24.48%
3Y*
18.53%
5Y*
13.83%
10Y*
14.39%

SC0H.DE

1D
-0.11%
1M
4.53%
YTD
11.30%
6M
10.69%
1Y
25.27%
3Y*
19.18%
5Y*
14.59%
10Y*
15.07%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

EL4Z.DE vs. SC0H.DE - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
EL4Z.DE
Deka MSCI USA UCITS ETF
11.05%3.99%32.17%22.99%-16.37%38.20%9.12%33.84%-1.63%6.08%
SC0H.DE
Invesco MSCI USA UCITS ETF
11.30%4.77%32.56%23.60%-15.55%38.99%9.76%35.08%-1.12%6.55%

Correlation

The correlation between EL4Z.DE and SC0H.DE is 1.00 - these two move nearly in lockstep. At this level, holding both provides almost no diversification benefit. If you already own one, adding the other does little to reduce portfolio risk.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.00

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.99

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.99

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

1.00

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 30, 2009

0.96

The correlation between EL4Z.DE and SC0H.DE has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.96 to 1.00 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

EL4Z.DE vs. SC0H.DE — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

EL4Z.DE
EL4Z.DE Risk / Return Rank: 6565
Overall Rank
EL4Z.DE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6464
Sharpe Ratio Rank
EL4Z.DE Sortino Ratio Rank: 6262
Sortino Ratio Rank
EL4Z.DE Omega Ratio Rank: 6666
Omega Ratio Rank
EL4Z.DE Calmar Ratio Rank: 6868
Calmar Ratio Rank
EL4Z.DE Martin Ratio Rank: 6464
Martin Ratio Rank

SC0H.DE
SC0H.DE Risk / Return Rank: 6767
Overall Rank
SC0H.DE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6767
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SC0H.DE Sortino Ratio Rank: 6464
Sortino Ratio Rank
SC0H.DE Omega Ratio Rank: 6868
Omega Ratio Rank
SC0H.DE Calmar Ratio Rank: 7070
Calmar Ratio Rank
SC0H.DE Martin Ratio Rank: 6666
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

EL4Z.DE vs. SC0H.DE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Deka MSCI USA UCITS ETF (EL4Z.DE) and Invesco MSCI USA UCITS ETF (SC0H.DE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


EL4Z.DESC0H.DEDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.07

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.08

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.39

1.40

-0.01

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.31

3.45

-0.14

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

11.44

11.96

-0.52

EL4Z.DE vs. SC0H.DE - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current EL4Z.DE Sharpe Ratio is 2.09, which is comparable to the SC0H.DE Sharpe Ratio of 2.16. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of EL4Z.DE and SC0H.DE, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


EL4Z.DESC0H.DEDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.09

2.16

-0.07

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.88

0.94

-0.05

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.88

0.92

-0.04

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.99

0.98

+0.02

Drawdowns

EL4Z.DE vs. SC0H.DE - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum EL4Z.DE drawdown since its inception was -34.19%, roughly equal to the maximum SC0H.DE drawdown of -34.20%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for EL4Z.DE and SC0H.DE.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


EL4Z.DESC0H.DEDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-34.19%

-34.20%

+0.01%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-7.42%

-7.32%

-0.10%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-24.03%

-23.66%

-0.37%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-24.03%

-23.66%

-0.37%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-34.19%

-34.20%

+0.01%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.40%

-0.41%

+0.01%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-4.23%

-4.13%

-0.10%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.15%

2.11%

+0.04%

Volatility

EL4Z.DE vs. SC0H.DE - Volatility Comparison

Deka MSCI USA UCITS ETF (EL4Z.DE) and Invesco MSCI USA UCITS ETF (SC0H.DE) have volatilities of 2.74% and 2.68%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


EL4Z.DESC0H.DEDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

2.74%

2.68%

+0.06%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

7.70%

7.66%

+0.04%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

11.74%

11.67%

+0.07%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

15.48%

15.41%

+0.07%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

16.22%

16.23%

-0.01%

EL4Z.DE vs. SC0H.DE - Expense Ratio Comparison

EL4Z.DE has a 0.30% expense ratio, which is higher than SC0H.DE's 0.05% expense ratio.


Dividends

EL4Z.DE vs. SC0H.DE - Dividend Comparison

EL4Z.DE's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.49%, while SC0H.DE has not paid dividends to shareholders.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
EL4Z.DE
Deka MSCI USA UCITS ETF
0.49%0.57%0.74%1.23%1.09%0.52%0.90%0.95%1.16%1.03%1.07%1.47%
SC0H.DE
Invesco MSCI USA UCITS ETF
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


With a correlation of 1.00, EL4Z.DE and SC0H.DE move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

On fees, SC0H.DE is cheaper at 0.05% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

SC0H.DE is cheaper with a 0.05% expense ratio, compared with 0.30% for EL4Z.DE.

Both ETFs track MSCI USA. They also come from different issuers: Deka Investment GmbH and Invesco. Their fees differ too: 0.30% for EL4Z.DE and 0.05% for SC0H.DE.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for EL4Z.DE and SC0H.DE

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer