PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
EKJAX vs. WRPIX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

EKJAX vs. WRPIX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Allspring Premier Large Company Growth Fund (EKJAX) and Allspring Alternative Risk Premia Fund (WRPIX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, EKJAX achieves a 1.17% return, which is significantly lower than WRPIX's 9.57% return.


EKJAX

1D
1.38%
1M
-2.46%
6M
4.61%
YTD
1.17%
1Y
2.29%
3Y*
20.94%
5Y*
6.92%
10Y*
15.36%
ALL TIME*
8.89%

WRPIX

1D
-0.67%
1M
2.53%
6M
4.69%
YTD
9.57%
1Y
19.19%
3Y*
7.79%
5Y*
7.23%
10Y*
ALL TIME*
2.74%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison


PositionAvg. Volume Value (2W)Avg. Volume Value (1M)Avg. Volume Value (3M)
$0.00$0.00$0.00
$0.00$0.00$0.00

EKJAX vs. WRPIX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025202420232022202120202019
EKJAX
Allspring Premier Large Company Growth Fund
1.17%16.28%36.91%33.14%-33.88%13.07%39.03%29.15%
WRPIX
Allspring Alternative Risk Premia Fund
9.57%5.37%11.23%-0.06%10.44%6.84%-16.77%-2.86%

Correlation

The correlation between EKJAX and WRPIX is 0.18, which is low. Their historical price movements had little consistent relationship.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.

0.18

Correlation (3Y)
Balances recent behavior with more history.

0.09

Correlation (5Y)
Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period.

-0.05

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 6, 2019

0.00

The correlation between EKJAX and WRPIX shifts across timeframes, from -0.05 (5 years) to 0.18 (1 year), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

EKJAX vs. WRPIX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

EKJAX
EKJAX Risk / Return Rank: 66
Overall Rank
EKJAX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 66
Sharpe Ratio Rank
EKJAX Sortino Ratio Rank: 66
Sortino Ratio Rank
EKJAX Omega Ratio Rank: 66
Omega Ratio Rank
EKJAX Calmar Ratio Rank: 66
Calmar Ratio Rank
EKJAX Martin Ratio Rank: 66
Martin Ratio Rank

WRPIX
WRPIX Risk / Return Rank: 9696
Overall Rank
WRPIX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9696
Sharpe Ratio Rank
WRPIX Sortino Ratio Rank: 9595
Sortino Ratio Rank
WRPIX Omega Ratio Rank: 9494
Omega Ratio Rank
WRPIX Calmar Ratio Rank: 9797
Calmar Ratio Rank
WRPIX Martin Ratio Rank: 9696
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

EKJAX vs. WRPIX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Allspring Premier Large Company Growth Fund (EKJAX) and Allspring Alternative Risk Premia Fund (WRPIX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


EKJAXWRPIXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-2.54

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-3.53

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.05

1.54

-0.48

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

0.25

5.13

-4.88

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

0.76

17.64

-16.88

EKJAX vs. WRPIX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current EKJAX Sharpe Ratio is 0.22, which is lower than the WRPIX Sharpe Ratio of 2.77. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of EKJAX and WRPIX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

EKJAX vs. WRPIX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum EKJAX drawdown since its inception was -59.70%, which is greater than WRPIX's maximum drawdown of -21.67%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for EKJAX and WRPIX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


EKJAXWRPIXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-59.70%

-21.67%

-38.03%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-18.10%

-3.76%

-14.34%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-25.48%

-8.72%

-16.76%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-50.43%

-8.72%

-41.71%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-50.43%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-5.64%

-1.87%

-3.77%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-20.47%

-7.20%

-13.27%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

5.91%

1.09%

+4.82%

Volatility

EKJAX vs. WRPIX - Volatility Comparison

Allspring Premier Large Company Growth Fund (EKJAX) has a higher volatility of 6.26% compared to Allspring Alternative Risk Premia Fund (WRPIX) at 2.27%. This indicates that EKJAX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than WRPIX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


EKJAXWRPIXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

6.26%

2.27%

+3.99%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

16.55%

5.27%

+11.28%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

20.16%

6.98%

+13.18%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

28.25%

7.17%

+21.08%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

25.53%

7.08%

+18.45%

EKJAX vs. WRPIX - Expense Ratio Comparison

EKJAX has a 1.11% expense ratio, which is higher than WRPIX's 0.72% expense ratio.


Dividends

EKJAX vs. WRPIX - Dividend Comparison

EKJAX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 32.04%, more than WRPIX's 6.54% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
EKJAX
Allspring Premier Large Company Growth Fund
32.04%32.41%20.46%40.04%0.00%27.04%12.00%16.22%21.24%28.36%11.30%7.21%
WRPIX
Allspring Alternative Risk Premia Fund
6.54%7.16%3.25%4.66%15.23%0.00%0.00%1.76%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


EKJAX and WRPIX have a correlation of 0.18, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

EKJAX has higher volatility (6.26%) compared to WRPIX (2.27%). In terms of maximum drawdown, EKJAX dropped -59.70% vs WRPIX's -21.67%.

WRPIX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.77 vs 0.22), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for EKJAX and WRPIX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer