EKJAX vs. SSHIX
Compare and contrast key facts about Allspring Premier Large Company Growth Fund (EKJAX) and Allspring Short-Term Bond Plus Fund (SSHIX).
EKJAX is managed by Allspring Global Investments. It was launched on Jan 20, 1998. SSHIX is managed by Allspring Global Investments. It was launched on Aug 31, 1999.
Performance
EKJAX vs. SSHIX - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
EKJAX vs. SSHIX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
EKJAX Allspring Premier Large Company Growth Fund | -13.16% | 16.28% | 36.91% | 33.14% | -33.88% | 13.07% | 39.03% | 45.22% | 1.13% | 34.03% |
SSHIX Allspring Short-Term Bond Plus Fund | 0.10% | 5.59% | 5.41% | 6.19% | -4.87% | 0.16% | 6.02% | 4.80% | 1.41% | 1.31% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, EKJAX achieves a -13.16% return, which is significantly lower than SSHIX's 0.10% return. Over the past 10 years, EKJAX has outperformed SSHIX with an annualized return of 14.16%, while SSHIX has yielded a comparatively lower 2.68% annualized return.
EKJAX
- 1D
- -1.09%
- 1M
- -10.80%
- YTD
- -13.16%
- 6M
- -15.55%
- 1Y
- 12.74%
- 3Y*
- 18.22%
- 5Y*
- 6.34%
- 10Y*
- 14.16%
SSHIX
- 1D
- 0.12%
- 1M
- -0.80%
- YTD
- 0.10%
- 6M
- 1.31%
- 1Y
- 4.29%
- 3Y*
- 5.08%
- 5Y*
- 2.41%
- 10Y*
- 2.68%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
EKJAX vs. SSHIX - Expense Ratio Comparison
EKJAX has a 1.11% expense ratio, which is higher than SSHIX's 0.47% expense ratio.
Return for Risk
EKJAX vs. SSHIX — Risk / Return Rank
EKJAX
SSHIX
EKJAX vs. SSHIX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Allspring Premier Large Company Growth Fund (EKJAX) and Allspring Short-Term Bond Plus Fund (SSHIX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| EKJAX | SSHIX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 0.53 | 3.15 | -2.62 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 0.91 | 4.93 | -4.03 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.13 | 1.90 | -0.77 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 0.54 | 4.39 | -3.85 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 1.81 | 19.31 | -17.50 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| EKJAX | SSHIX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.53 | 3.15 | -2.62 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.23 | 1.18 | -0.95 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.56 | 1.45 | -0.89 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.37 | 1.56 | -1.19 |
Correlation
The correlation between EKJAX and SSHIX is -0.08. This indicates that the assets' prices tend to move in opposite directions. Negative correlation can be particularly beneficial for diversification and risk management, as one asset may offset the losses of the other during market fluctuations.
Dividends
EKJAX vs. SSHIX - Dividend Comparison
EKJAX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 37.32%, more than SSHIX's 4.58% yield.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
EKJAX Allspring Premier Large Company Growth Fund | 37.32% | 32.41% | 20.46% | 40.04% | 0.00% | 27.04% | 12.00% | 16.22% | 21.24% | 28.36% | 11.30% | 7.21% |
SSHIX Allspring Short-Term Bond Plus Fund | 4.58% | 4.27% | 4.43% | 3.92% | 1.92% | 2.31% | 3.14% | 2.61% | 2.21% | 1.65% | 1.58% | 1.70% |
Drawdowns
EKJAX vs. SSHIX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum EKJAX drawdown since its inception was -59.70%, which is greater than SSHIX's maximum drawdown of -7.13%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for EKJAX and SSHIX.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| EKJAX | SSHIX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -59.70% | -7.13% | -52.57% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -18.10% | -1.03% | -17.07% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -50.43% | -7.13% | -43.30% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -50.43% | -7.13% | -43.30% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -18.10% | -0.80% | -17.30% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -20.68% | -0.62% | -20.06% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 5.41% | 0.23% | +5.18% |
Volatility
EKJAX vs. SSHIX - Volatility Comparison
Allspring Premier Large Company Growth Fund (EKJAX) has a higher volatility of 6.72% compared to Allspring Short-Term Bond Plus Fund (SSHIX) at 0.55%. This indicates that EKJAX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than SSHIX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| EKJAX | SSHIX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 6.72% | 0.55% | +6.17% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 13.71% | 0.85% | +12.86% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 23.62% | 1.41% | +22.21% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 27.92% | 2.05% | +25.87% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 25.30% | 1.85% | +23.45% |