PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
EKJAX vs. FZAPX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

EKJAX vs. FZAPX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Allspring Premier Large Company Growth Fund (EKJAX) and Fidelity Advisor Stock Selector All Cap Fund Class Z (FZAPX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, EKJAX achieves a 1.17% return, which is significantly lower than FZAPX's 17.21% return. Both investments have delivered pretty close results over the past 10 years, with EKJAX having a 15.36% annualized return and FZAPX not far behind at 15.10%.


EKJAX

1D
1.38%
1M
-2.46%
6M
4.61%
YTD
1.17%
1Y
2.29%
3Y*
20.94%
5Y*
6.92%
10Y*
15.36%
ALL TIME*
8.89%

FZAPX

1D
1.57%
1M
1.52%
6M
14.30%
YTD
17.21%
1Y
29.33%
3Y*
21.64%
5Y*
12.60%
10Y*
15.10%
ALL TIME*
13.95%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison


PositionAvg. Volume Value (2W)Avg. Volume Value (1M)Avg. Volume Value (3M)
$0.00$0.00$0.00
$0.00$0.00$0.00

EKJAX vs. FZAPX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
EKJAX
Allspring Premier Large Company Growth Fund
1.17%16.28%36.91%33.14%-33.88%13.07%39.03%45.22%1.13%34.03%
FZAPX
Fidelity Advisor Stock Selector All Cap Fund Class Z
17.21%18.98%19.88%27.05%-19.49%23.25%25.03%32.34%-8.52%24.38%

Correlation

The correlation between EKJAX and FZAPX is 0.91, meaning they have usually moved in the same direction, including during past declines.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.

0.91

Correlation (3Y)
Balances recent behavior with more history.

0.89

Correlation (5Y)
Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period.

0.91

Correlation (10Y)
Provides a long-term view across more market conditions.

0.90

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 20, 2013

0.91

The correlation between EKJAX and FZAPX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.89 to 0.91 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

EKJAX vs. FZAPX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

EKJAX
EKJAX Risk / Return Rank: 66
Overall Rank
EKJAX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 66
Sharpe Ratio Rank
EKJAX Sortino Ratio Rank: 66
Sortino Ratio Rank
EKJAX Omega Ratio Rank: 66
Omega Ratio Rank
EKJAX Calmar Ratio Rank: 66
Calmar Ratio Rank
EKJAX Martin Ratio Rank: 66
Martin Ratio Rank

FZAPX
FZAPX Risk / Return Rank: 8787
Overall Rank
FZAPX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8888
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FZAPX Sortino Ratio Rank: 8383
Sortino Ratio Rank
FZAPX Omega Ratio Rank: 8181
Omega Ratio Rank
FZAPX Calmar Ratio Rank: 8888
Calmar Ratio Rank
FZAPX Martin Ratio Rank: 9494
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

EKJAX vs. FZAPX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Allspring Premier Large Company Growth Fund (EKJAX) and Fidelity Advisor Stock Selector All Cap Fund Class Z (FZAPX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


EKJAXFZAPXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-1.99

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-2.56

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.05

1.39

-0.34

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

0.25

3.43

-3.18

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

0.76

15.55

-14.79

EKJAX vs. FZAPX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current EKJAX Sharpe Ratio is 0.22, which is lower than the FZAPX Sharpe Ratio of 2.22. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of EKJAX and FZAPX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

EKJAX vs. FZAPX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum EKJAX drawdown since its inception was -59.70%, which is greater than FZAPX's maximum drawdown of -34.37%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for EKJAX and FZAPX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


EKJAXFZAPXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-59.70%

-34.37%

-25.33%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-18.10%

-9.20%

-8.90%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-25.48%

-20.84%

-4.64%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-50.43%

-25.20%

-25.23%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-50.43%

-34.37%

-16.06%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-5.64%

-0.02%

-5.62%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-20.47%

-4.52%

-15.95%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

5.91%

2.03%

+3.88%

Volatility

EKJAX vs. FZAPX - Volatility Comparison

Allspring Premier Large Company Growth Fund (EKJAX) has a higher volatility of 6.26% compared to Fidelity Advisor Stock Selector All Cap Fund Class Z (FZAPX) at 4.10%. This indicates that EKJAX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than FZAPX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


EKJAXFZAPXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

6.26%

4.10%

+2.16%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

16.55%

11.48%

+5.07%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

20.16%

14.25%

+5.91%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

28.25%

17.93%

+10.32%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

25.53%

18.59%

+6.94%

EKJAX vs. FZAPX - Expense Ratio Comparison

EKJAX has a 1.11% expense ratio, which is higher than FZAPX's 0.58% expense ratio.


Dividends

EKJAX vs. FZAPX - Dividend Comparison

EKJAX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 32.04%, more than FZAPX's 4.17% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
EKJAX
Allspring Premier Large Company Growth Fund
32.04%32.41%20.46%40.04%0.00%27.04%12.00%16.22%21.24%28.36%11.30%7.21%
FZAPX
Fidelity Advisor Stock Selector All Cap Fund Class Z
4.17%4.88%4.91%2.12%0.39%1.47%5.33%6.18%4.59%3.07%1.13%5.24%

Frequently Asked Questions


With a correlation of 0.91, EKJAX and FZAPX move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

EKJAX has higher volatility (6.26%) compared to FZAPX (4.10%). In terms of maximum drawdown, EKJAX dropped -59.70% vs FZAPX's -34.37%.

FZAPX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.22 vs 0.22), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for EKJAX and FZAPX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer