PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
EKJAX vs. CHASX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

EKJAX vs. CHASX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Allspring Premier Large Company Growth Fund (EKJAX) and Chase Growth Fund (CHASX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, EKJAX achieves a 1.17% return, which is significantly lower than CHASX's 23.80% return. Over the past 10 years, EKJAX has underperformed CHASX with an annualized return of 15.36%, while CHASX has yielded a comparatively higher 19.59% annualized return.


EKJAX

1D
1.38%
1M
-2.46%
6M
4.61%
YTD
1.17%
1Y
2.29%
3Y*
20.94%
5Y*
6.92%
10Y*
15.36%
ALL TIME*
8.89%

CHASX

1D
1.45%
1M
0.31%
6M
18.91%
YTD
23.80%
1Y
36.52%
3Y*
39.31%
5Y*
20.99%
10Y*
19.59%
ALL TIME*
11.41%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison


PositionAvg. Volume Value (2W)Avg. Volume Value (1M)Avg. Volume Value (3M)
$0.00$0.00$0.00
$0.00$0.00$0.00

EKJAX vs. CHASX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
EKJAX
Allspring Premier Large Company Growth Fund
1.17%16.28%36.91%33.14%-33.88%13.07%39.03%45.22%1.13%34.03%
CHASX
Chase Growth Fund
23.80%20.61%64.71%25.91%-20.41%22.32%18.27%42.63%-3.96%24.49%

Correlation

The correlation between EKJAX and CHASX is 0.88, meaning they have usually moved in the same direction, including during past declines.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.

0.88

Correlation (3Y)
Balances recent behavior with more history.

0.90

Correlation (5Y)
Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period.

0.89

Correlation (10Y)
Provides a long-term view across more market conditions.

0.89

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 4, 1999

0.90

The correlation between EKJAX and CHASX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.88 to 0.90 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

EKJAX vs. CHASX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

EKJAX
EKJAX Risk / Return Rank: 66
Overall Rank
EKJAX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 66
Sharpe Ratio Rank
EKJAX Sortino Ratio Rank: 66
Sortino Ratio Rank
EKJAX Omega Ratio Rank: 66
Omega Ratio Rank
EKJAX Calmar Ratio Rank: 66
Calmar Ratio Rank
EKJAX Martin Ratio Rank: 66
Martin Ratio Rank

CHASX
CHASX Risk / Return Rank: 8484
Overall Rank
CHASX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8383
Sharpe Ratio Rank
CHASX Sortino Ratio Rank: 7777
Sortino Ratio Rank
CHASX Omega Ratio Rank: 7373
Omega Ratio Rank
CHASX Calmar Ratio Rank: 9393
Calmar Ratio Rank
CHASX Martin Ratio Rank: 9494
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

EKJAX vs. CHASX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Allspring Premier Large Company Growth Fund (EKJAX) and Chase Growth Fund (CHASX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


EKJAXCHASXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-1.81

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-2.29

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.05

1.34

-0.29

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

0.25

3.96

-3.71

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

0.76

15.55

-14.79

EKJAX vs. CHASX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current EKJAX Sharpe Ratio is 0.22, which is lower than the CHASX Sharpe Ratio of 2.04. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of EKJAX and CHASX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

EKJAX vs. CHASX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum EKJAX drawdown since its inception was -59.70%, which is greater than CHASX's maximum drawdown of -45.94%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for EKJAX and CHASX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


EKJAXCHASXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-59.70%

-45.94%

-13.76%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-18.10%

-9.90%

-8.20%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-25.48%

-23.40%

-2.08%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-50.43%

-24.63%

-25.80%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-50.43%

-30.40%

-20.03%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-5.64%

-2.69%

-2.95%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-20.47%

-9.11%

-11.36%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

5.91%

2.52%

+3.39%

Volatility

EKJAX vs. CHASX - Volatility Comparison

Allspring Premier Large Company Growth Fund (EKJAX) and Chase Growth Fund (CHASX) have volatilities of 6.26% and 6.32%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


EKJAXCHASXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

6.26%

6.32%

-0.06%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

16.55%

15.30%

+1.25%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

20.16%

19.29%

+0.87%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

28.25%

20.54%

+7.71%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

25.53%

20.05%

+5.48%

EKJAX vs. CHASX - Expense Ratio Comparison

EKJAX has a 1.11% expense ratio, which is lower than CHASX's 1.14% expense ratio.


Dividends

EKJAX vs. CHASX - Dividend Comparison

EKJAX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 32.04%, more than CHASX's 7.37% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
CHASX
Chase Growth Fund
7.37%9.12%36.67%5.80%5.49%20.15%7.83%22.82%12.92%11.92%9.14%10.24%
EKJAX
Allspring Premier Large Company Growth Fund
32.04%32.41%20.46%40.04%0.00%27.04%12.00%16.22%21.24%28.36%11.30%7.21%

Frequently Asked Questions


EKJAX and CHASX have a correlation of 0.88, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

CHASX has higher volatility (6.32%) compared to EKJAX (6.26%). In terms of maximum drawdown, EKJAX dropped -59.70% vs CHASX's -45.94%.

CHASX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.04 vs 0.22), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for EKJAX and CHASX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer