EKBAX vs. FHLKX
Compare and contrast key facts about Allspring Diversified Capital Builder Fund (EKBAX) and Fidelity Health Savings Fund Class K (FHLKX).
EKBAX is managed by Allspring Global Investments. It was launched on Jan 19, 1998. FHLKX is managed by Fidelity. It was launched on Mar 2, 2020.
Performance
EKBAX vs. FHLKX - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, EKBAX achieves a 8.92% return, which is significantly higher than FHLKX's 0.81% return.
EKBAX
- 1D
- 0.18%
- 1M
- -0.90%
- YTD
- 8.92%
- 6M
- 14.89%
- 1Y
- 60.25%
- 3Y*
- 23.52%
- 5Y*
- 14.65%
- 10Y*
- 14.28%
FHLKX
- 1D
- 0.00%
- 1M
- -1.05%
- YTD
- 0.81%
- 6M
- 2.23%
- 1Y
- 15.40%
- 3Y*
- 8.35%
- 5Y*
- 3.69%
- 10Y*
- —
EKBAX vs. FHLKX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
EKBAX Allspring Diversified Capital Builder Fund | 8.92% | 21.87% | 21.75% | 22.23% | -13.47% | 19.61% | 21.53% |
FHLKX Fidelity Health Savings Fund Class K | 0.81% | 12.17% | 7.06% | 9.82% | -14.79% | 5.50% | 10.70% |
Correlation
The correlation between EKBAX and FHLKX is 0.74, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined. Holding both can reduce overall portfolio volatility compared to holding either one alone.
EKBAX vs. FHLKX - Expense Ratio Comparison
EKBAX has a 1.10% expense ratio, which is higher than FHLKX's 0.37% expense ratio.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
EKBAX vs. FHLKX — Risk / Return Rank
EKBAX
FHLKX
EKBAX vs. FHLKX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Allspring Diversified Capital Builder Fund (EKBAX) and Fidelity Health Savings Fund Class K (FHLKX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| EKBAX | FHLKX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 1.95 | 1.66 | +0.28 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 2.54 | 2.34 | +0.20 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.40 | 1.35 | +0.05 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 3.15 | 2.35 | +0.81 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 15.28 | 9.95 | +5.32 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| EKBAX | FHLKX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.95 | 1.66 | +0.28 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.82 | 0.56 | +0.27 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.82 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.47 | 0.65 | -0.18 |
Drawdowns
EKBAX vs. FHLKX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum EKBAX drawdown since its inception was -55.64%, which is greater than FHLKX's maximum drawdown of -19.09%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for EKBAX and FHLKX.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| EKBAX | FHLKX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -55.64% | -19.09% | -36.55% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -7.32% | -4.42% | -2.90% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -24.84% | -19.09% | -5.75% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -32.33% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -3.46% | -2.86% | -0.60% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -8.02% | -4.94% | -3.08% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.74% | 1.17% | +1.57% |
Volatility
EKBAX vs. FHLKX - Volatility Comparison
Allspring Diversified Capital Builder Fund (EKBAX) has a higher volatility of 6.22% compared to Fidelity Health Savings Fund Class K (FHLKX) at 2.89%. This indicates that EKBAX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than FHLKX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| EKBAX | FHLKX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 6.22% | 2.89% | +3.33% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 13.07% | 4.53% | +8.54% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 20.90% | 6.85% | +14.05% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 17.89% | 6.66% | +11.23% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 17.41% | 7.27% | +10.14% |
Dividends
EKBAX vs. FHLKX - Dividend Comparison
EKBAX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 8.83%, more than FHLKX's 3.04% yield.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
EKBAX Allspring Diversified Capital Builder Fund | 8.83% | 9.61% | 5.28% | 6.16% | 12.50% | 6.89% | 2.03% | 9.49% | 7.14% | 6.20% | 10.05% | 11.47% |
FHLKX Fidelity Health Savings Fund Class K | 2.89% | 3.05% | 3.01% | 2.88% | 3.85% | 2.84% | 1.73% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |