PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
EJUL vs. SGOV
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

EJUL vs. SGOV - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Innovator Emerging Markets Power Buffer ETF - July (EJUL) and iShares 0-3 Month Treasury Bond ETF (SGOV). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, EJUL achieves a 5.23% return, which is significantly higher than SGOV's 1.70% return.


EJUL

1D
0.14%
1M
0.85%
YTD
5.23%
6M
5.81%
1Y
17.63%
3Y*
10.63%
5Y*
3.02%
10Y*

SGOV

1D
0.01%
1M
0.27%
YTD
1.70%
6M
1.80%
1Y
3.93%
3Y*
4.68%
5Y*
3.58%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

EJUL vs. SGOV - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020
EJUL
Innovator Emerging Markets Power Buffer ETF - July
5.23%20.20%4.38%3.50%-10.92%-2.43%7.28%
SGOV
iShares 0-3 Month Treasury Bond ETF
1.70%4.24%5.27%5.12%1.58%0.04%0.04%

Correlation

The correlation between EJUL and SGOV is -0.14, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

-0.14

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

-0.02

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.01

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since May 28, 2020

0.01

The correlation between EJUL and SGOV shifts across timeframes, from -0.14 (1 year) to 0.01 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

EJUL vs. SGOV — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

EJUL
EJUL Risk / Return Rank: 8989
Overall Rank
EJUL Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8484
Sharpe Ratio Rank
EJUL Sortino Ratio Rank: 9191
Sortino Ratio Rank
EJUL Omega Ratio Rank: 9191
Omega Ratio Rank
EJUL Calmar Ratio Rank: 8686
Calmar Ratio Rank
EJUL Martin Ratio Rank: 9191
Martin Ratio Rank

SGOV
SGOV Risk / Return Rank: 100100
Overall Rank
SGOV Sharpe Ratio Rank: 100100
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SGOV Sortino Ratio Rank: 100100
Sortino Ratio Rank
SGOV Omega Ratio Rank: 100100
Omega Ratio Rank
SGOV Calmar Ratio Rank: 100100
Calmar Ratio Rank
SGOV Martin Ratio Rank: 100100
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

EJUL vs. SGOV - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Innovator Emerging Markets Power Buffer ETF - July (EJUL) and iShares 0-3 Month Treasury Bond ETF (SGOV). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


EJULSGOVDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-17.78

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-270.20

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.58

194.55

-192.97

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

4.65

396.11

-391.46

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

20.99

4,438.60

-4,417.61

EJUL vs. SGOV - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current EJUL Sharpe Ratio is 2.60, which is lower than the SGOV Sharpe Ratio of 20.38. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of EJUL and SGOV, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

EJUL vs. SGOV - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum EJUL drawdown since its inception was -21.61%, which is greater than SGOV's maximum drawdown of -0.03%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for EJUL and SGOV.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


EJULSGOVDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-21.61%

-0.03%

-21.58%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-3.81%

-0.01%

-3.80%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-8.36%

-0.01%

-8.35%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-21.52%

-0.03%

-21.49%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

0.00%

0.00%

0.00%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-6.56%

-0.00%

-6.56%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

0.84%

0.00%

+0.84%

Volatility

EJUL vs. SGOV - Volatility Comparison

Innovator Emerging Markets Power Buffer ETF - July (EJUL) has a higher volatility of 0.76% compared to iShares 0-3 Month Treasury Bond ETF (SGOV) at 0.06%. This indicates that EJUL's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than SGOV based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


EJULSGOVDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

0.76%

0.06%

+0.70%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

4.68%

0.13%

+4.55%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

6.82%

0.19%

+6.63%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

10.66%

0.24%

+10.42%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

11.41%

0.24%

+11.17%

EJUL vs. SGOV - Expense Ratio Comparison

EJUL has a 0.89% expense ratio, which is higher than SGOV's 0.09% expense ratio.


Dividends

EJUL vs. SGOV - Dividend Comparison

EJUL has not paid dividends to shareholders, while SGOV's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.85%.


PositionTTM2025202420232022202120202019
EJUL
Innovator Emerging Markets Power Buffer ETF - July
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.64%
SGOV
iShares 0-3 Month Treasury Bond ETF
3.85%4.10%5.10%4.87%1.45%0.03%0.05%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


EJUL and SGOV have a correlation of -0.14, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

EJUL has higher volatility (0.76%) compared to SGOV (0.06%). In terms of maximum drawdown, EJUL dropped -21.61% vs SGOV's -0.03%.

On 5-year performance, SGOV leads with 3.58% vs 3.02% for EJUL. On fees, SGOV is cheaper at 0.09% per year. On volatility, SGOV has been the lower-risk option at 0.06%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 5-year period, SGOV has performed better with a 3.58% return vs 3.02%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

SGOV is cheaper with a 0.09% expense ratio, compared with 0.89% for EJUL.

SGOV has the higher dividend yield at 3.85%, compared with 0.00% for EJUL.

EJUL is categorized as Defined Outcome, while SGOV is Ultrashort Bond. EJUL tracks MSCI Emerging Markets Index, while SGOV tracks ICE 0-3 Month US Treasury Securities Index. They also come from different issuers: Innovator and iShares. Their fees differ too: 0.89% for EJUL and 0.09% for SGOV.

SGOV currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (20.38 vs 2.60), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for EJUL and SGOV

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer