PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
EJUL vs. SFLR
Performance
Return for Risk
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

Performance

EJUL vs. SFLR - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Innovator Emerging Markets Power Buffer ETF - July (EJUL) and Innovator Equity Managed Floor ETF (SFLR). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading graphics...

EJUL vs. SFLR - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025202420232022
EJUL
Innovator Emerging Markets Power Buffer ETF - July
1.38%20.20%4.38%3.50%4.92%
SFLR
Innovator Equity Managed Floor ETF
-3.03%13.29%19.99%21.20%1.38%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, EJUL achieves a 1.38% return, which is significantly higher than SFLR's -3.03% return.


EJUL

1D
0.57%
1M
-1.09%
YTD
1.38%
6M
3.61%
1Y
18.83%
3Y*
8.78%
5Y*
2.47%
10Y*

SFLR

1D
0.85%
1M
-3.06%
YTD
-3.03%
6M
-0.93%
1Y
14.17%
3Y*
14.51%
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


EJUL vs. SFLR - Expense Ratio Comparison

Both EJUL and SFLR have an expense ratio of 0.89%.


Return for Risk

EJUL vs. SFLR — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

EJUL
EJUL Risk / Return Rank: 9191
Overall Rank
EJUL Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8989
Sharpe Ratio Rank
EJUL Sortino Ratio Rank: 9393
Sortino Ratio Rank
EJUL Omega Ratio Rank: 9393
Omega Ratio Rank
EJUL Calmar Ratio Rank: 8787
Calmar Ratio Rank
EJUL Martin Ratio Rank: 9595
Martin Ratio Rank

SFLR
SFLR Risk / Return Rank: 7171
Overall Rank
SFLR Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7171
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SFLR Sortino Ratio Rank: 7070
Sortino Ratio Rank
SFLR Omega Ratio Rank: 6868
Omega Ratio Rank
SFLR Calmar Ratio Rank: 7474
Calmar Ratio Rank
SFLR Martin Ratio Rank: 7474
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

EJUL vs. SFLR - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Innovator Emerging Markets Power Buffer ETF - July (EJUL) and Innovator Equity Managed Floor ETF (SFLR). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


EJULSFLRDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

1.98

1.31

+0.67

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

2.95

1.82

+1.13

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.44

1.26

+0.17

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

2.99

2.09

+0.91

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

16.21

8.18

+8.03

EJUL vs. SFLR - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current EJUL Sharpe Ratio is 1.98, which is higher than the SFLR Sharpe Ratio of 1.31. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of EJUL and SFLR, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Loading graphics...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


EJULSFLRDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.98

1.31

+0.67

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.23

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.23

1.49

-1.27

Correlation

The correlation between EJUL and SFLR is 0.55, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.


Dividends

EJUL vs. SFLR - Dividend Comparison

EJUL has not paid dividends to shareholders, while SFLR's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.35%.


TTM2025202420232022202120202019
EJUL
Innovator Emerging Markets Power Buffer ETF - July
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.64%
SFLR
Innovator Equity Managed Floor ETF
0.35%0.33%0.42%1.16%0.06%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Drawdowns

EJUL vs. SFLR - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum EJUL drawdown since its inception was -21.61%, which is greater than SFLR's maximum drawdown of -12.13%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for EJUL and SFLR.


Loading graphics...

Drawdown Indicators


EJULSFLRDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-21.61%

-12.13%

-9.48%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-6.34%

-6.79%

+0.45%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-21.61%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-1.63%

-4.43%

+2.80%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-6.77%

-1.76%

-5.01%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.17%

1.73%

-0.56%

Volatility

EJUL vs. SFLR - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Innovator Emerging Markets Power Buffer ETF - July (EJUL) is 3.42%, while Innovator Equity Managed Floor ETF (SFLR) has a volatility of 3.79%. This indicates that EJUL experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than SFLR based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading graphics...

Volatility by Period


EJULSFLRDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.42%

3.79%

-0.37%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

5.19%

7.45%

-2.26%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

9.55%

10.85%

-1.30%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

10.61%

10.30%

+0.31%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

11.56%

10.30%

+1.26%