EJAP.DE vs. XMK9.DE

Last updated Jun 5, 2026

EJAP.DE (BNP Paribas Easy MSCI Japan ESG Filtered Min TE UCITS ETF) and XMK9.DE (Xtrackers MSCI Japan UCITS ETF 4C EUR Hedged) are both Japan Equities funds - EJAP.DE tracks the MSCI Japan ESG Filtered Min TE while XMK9.DE tracks the MSCI Japan. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, EJAP.DE returned 10.25%/yr vs 19.08%/yr for XMK9.DE. Their correlation of 0.83 suggests significant overlap in exposure. EJAP.DE charges 0.15%/yr vs 0.40%/yr for XMK9.DE.

Performance

EJAP.DE vs. XMK9.DE - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a €10,000 investment in BNP Paribas Easy MSCI Japan ESG Filtered Min TE UCITS ETF (EJAP.DE) and Xtrackers MSCI Japan UCITS ETF 4C EUR Hedged (XMK9.DE). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, EJAP.DE achieves a 16.87% return, which is significantly lower than XMK9.DE's 19.57% return.

EJAP.DE

• 1D: -0.24%
• 1M: 6.39%
• YTD: 16.87%
• 6M: 16.66%
• 1Y: 29.75%
• 3Y*: 15.41%
• 5Y*: 10.25%
• 10Y*: —

XMK9.DE

• 1D: 0.46%
• 1M: 7.79%
• YTD: 19.57%
• 6M: 21.56%
• 1Y: 50.92%
• 3Y*: 26.94%
• 5Y*: 19.08%
• 10Y*: 13.95%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

EJAP.DE vs. XMK9.DE - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
EJAP.DE BNP Paribas Easy MSCI Japan ESG Filtered Min TE UCITS ETF	16.87%	11.73%	14.53%	16.88%	-12.11%	10.01%	5.26%	22.39%	-93.57%	9.12%
XMK9.DE Xtrackers MSCI Japan UCITS ETF 4C EUR Hedged	19.57%	27.06%	22.49%	33.31%	-6.05%	11.97%	7.34%	17.42%	-16.83%	18.79%

Correlation

The correlation between EJAP.DE and XMK9.DE is 0.92, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.92
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.87
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.82
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 19, 2016	0.83

The correlation between EJAP.DE and XMK9.DE has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.82 to 0.92 - a consistent structural relationship.

Return for Risk

EJAP.DE vs. XMK9.DE — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

EJAP.DE

EJAP.DE Risk / Return Rank: 51
EJAP.DE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 45
EJAP.DE Sortino Ratio Rank: 50
EJAP.DE Omega Ratio Rank: 49
EJAP.DE Calmar Ratio Rank: 59
EJAP.DE Martin Ratio Rank: 54

XMK9.DE

XMK9.DE Risk / Return Rank: 85
XMK9.DE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 83
XMK9.DE Sortino Ratio Rank: 85
XMK9.DE Omega Ratio Rank: 83
XMK9.DE Calmar Ratio Rank: 89
XMK9.DE Martin Ratio Rank: 86

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

EJAP.DE vs. XMK9.DE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for BNP Paribas Easy MSCI Japan ESG Filtered Min TE UCITS ETF (EJAP.DE) and Xtrackers MSCI Japan UCITS ETF 4C EUR Hedged (XMK9.DE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	EJAP.DE	XMK9.DE	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	1.56	2.64	-1.08
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	2.38	3.73	-1.35
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.30	1.49	-0.20
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	2.86	5.21	-2.35
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	9.27	17.91	-8.64
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

EJAP.DE vs. XMK9.DE - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current EJAP.DE Sharpe Ratio is 1.56, which is lower than the XMK9.DE Sharpe Ratio of 2.64. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of EJAP.DE and XMK9.DE, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	EJAP.DE	XMK9.DE	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	1.56	2.64	-1.08
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.61	1.01	-0.40
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	—	0.74	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	-0.49	0.70	-1.19

Drawdowns

EJAP.DE vs. XMK9.DE - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum EJAP.DE drawdown since its inception was -94.44%, which is greater than XMK9.DE's maximum drawdown of -34.29%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for EJAP.DE and XMK9.DE.

Drawdown Indicators

	EJAP.DE	XMK9.DE	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-94.44%	-34.29%	-60.15%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-10.34%	-9.72%	-0.62%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-16.92%	-21.74%	+4.82%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-18.42%	-21.74%	+3.32%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	—	-34.29%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-86.65%	0.00%	-86.65%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-75.83%	-7.71%	-68.12%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	3.20%	2.83%	+0.37%

Volatility

EJAP.DE vs. XMK9.DE - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for BNP Paribas Easy MSCI Japan ESG Filtered Min TE UCITS ETF (EJAP.DE) is 3.42%, while Xtrackers MSCI Japan UCITS ETF 4C EUR Hedged (XMK9.DE) has a volatility of 3.68%. This indicates that EJAP.DE experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than XMK9.DE based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	EJAP.DE	XMK9.DE	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	3.42%	3.68%	-0.26%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	15.03%	14.80%	+0.23%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	19.03%	19.21%	-0.18%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	16.64%	18.65%	-2.01%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	34.09%	18.80%	+15.29%

EJAP.DE vs. XMK9.DE - Expense Ratio Comparison

EJAP.DE has a 0.15% expense ratio, which is lower than XMK9.DE's 0.40% expense ratio.

Dividends

EJAP.DE vs. XMK9.DE - Dividend Comparison

Neither EJAP.DE nor XMK9.DE has paid dividends to shareholders.

Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both EJAP.DE and XMK9.DE in my portfolio?

With a correlation of 0.92, EJAP.DE and XMK9.DE move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

Which ETF is better, EJAP.DE or XMK9.DE?

On fees, EJAP.DE is cheaper at 0.15% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF is cheaper, EJAP.DE or XMK9.DE?

EJAP.DE is cheaper with a 0.15% expense ratio, compared with 0.40% for XMK9.DE.

What is the main difference between EJAP.DE and XMK9.DE?

EJAP.DE tracks MSCI Japan ESG Filtered Min TE, while XMK9.DE tracks MSCI Japan. They also come from different issuers: BNP Paribas and Xtrackers. Their fees differ too: 0.15% for EJAP.DE and 0.40% for XMK9.DE.