EJAP.DE vs. EUNN.DE
EJAP.DE (BNP Paribas Easy MSCI Japan ESG Filtered Min TE UCITS ETF) and EUNN.DE (iShares Core MSCI Japan IMI UCITS ETF) are both Japan Equities funds - EJAP.DE tracks the MSCI Japan ESG Filtered Min TE while EUNN.DE tracks the MSCI Japan IMI. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, EJAP.DE returned 10.25%/yr vs 9.85%/yr for EUNN.DE. With a 0.99 correlation, they move nearly in lockstep. EJAP.DE charges 0.15%/yr vs 0.12%/yr for EUNN.DE.
Performance
EJAP.DE vs. EUNN.DE - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
The year-to-date returns for both stocks are quite close, with EJAP.DE having a 16.87% return and EUNN.DE slightly lower at 16.53%.
EJAP.DE
- 1D
- -0.24%
- 1M
- 6.39%
- YTD
- 16.87%
- 6M
- 16.66%
- 1Y
- 29.75%
- 3Y*
- 15.41%
- 5Y*
- 10.25%
- 10Y*
- —
EUNN.DE
- 1D
- -0.27%
- 1M
- 5.77%
- YTD
- 16.53%
- 6M
- 16.83%
- 1Y
- 30.19%
- 3Y*
- 15.47%
- 5Y*
- 9.85%
- 10Y*
- 9.05%
EJAP.DE vs. EUNN.DE - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
EJAP.DE BNP Paribas Easy MSCI Japan ESG Filtered Min TE UCITS ETF | 16.87% | 11.73% | 14.53% | 16.88% | -12.11% | 10.01% | 5.26% | 22.39% | -93.57% | 9.12% |
EUNN.DE iShares Core MSCI Japan IMI UCITS ETF | 16.53% | 13.46% | 12.90% | 15.16% | -11.47% | 9.25% | 4.10% | 22.24% | -10.32% | 10.42% |
Correlation
The correlation between EJAP.DE and EUNN.DE is 0.98 - these two move nearly in lockstep. At this level, holding both provides almost no diversification benefit. If you already own one, adding the other does little to reduce portfolio risk.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.98 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.99 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.99 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 19, 2016 | 0.99 |
The correlation between EJAP.DE and EUNN.DE has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.98 to 0.99 - a consistent structural relationship.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
EJAP.DE vs. EUNN.DE — Risk / Return Rank
EJAP.DE
EUNN.DE
EJAP.DE vs. EUNN.DE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for BNP Paribas Easy MSCI Japan ESG Filtered Min TE UCITS ETF (EJAP.DE) and iShares Core MSCI Japan IMI UCITS ETF (EUNN.DE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| EJAP.DE | EUNN.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.12 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.15 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.30 | 1.32 | -0.02 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.86 | 3.14 | -0.27 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 9.27 | 10.51 | -1.25 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| EJAP.DE | EUNN.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.56 | 1.67 | -0.12 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.61 | 0.61 | 0.00 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | — | 0.56 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | -0.49 | 0.53 | -1.03 |
Drawdowns
EJAP.DE vs. EUNN.DE - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum EJAP.DE drawdown since its inception was -94.44%, which is greater than EUNN.DE's maximum drawdown of -28.55%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for EJAP.DE and EUNN.DE.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| EJAP.DE | EUNN.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -94.44% | -28.55% | -65.89% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -10.34% | -9.58% | -0.76% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -16.92% | -15.81% | -1.11% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -18.42% | -19.41% | +0.99% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -28.55% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -86.65% | -0.27% | -86.38% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -75.83% | -6.85% | -68.98% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 3.20% | 2.86% | +0.34% |
Volatility
EJAP.DE vs. EUNN.DE - Volatility Comparison
BNP Paribas Easy MSCI Japan ESG Filtered Min TE UCITS ETF (EJAP.DE) has a higher volatility of 3.42% compared to iShares Core MSCI Japan IMI UCITS ETF (EUNN.DE) at 3.16%. This indicates that EJAP.DE's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than EUNN.DE based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| EJAP.DE | EUNN.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 3.42% | 3.16% | +0.26% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 15.03% | 14.53% | +0.50% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 19.03% | 17.97% | +1.06% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 16.64% | 16.04% | +0.60% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 34.09% | 16.08% | +18.01% |
EJAP.DE vs. EUNN.DE - Expense Ratio Comparison
EJAP.DE has a 0.15% expense ratio, which is higher than EUNN.DE's 0.12% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Dividends
EJAP.DE vs. EUNN.DE - Dividend Comparison
Neither EJAP.DE nor EUNN.DE has paid dividends to shareholders.
Frequently Asked Questions
With a correlation of 0.98, EJAP.DE and EUNN.DE move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.
On fees, EUNN.DE is cheaper at 0.12% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
EUNN.DE is cheaper with a 0.12% expense ratio, compared with 0.15% for EJAP.DE.
EJAP.DE tracks MSCI Japan ESG Filtered Min TE, while EUNN.DE tracks MSCI Japan IMI. They also come from different issuers: BNP Paribas and iShares. Their fees differ too: 0.15% for EJAP.DE and 0.12% for EUNN.DE.
Find the right allocation for EJAP.DE and EUNN.DE
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer