EJAP.DE vs. ETLR.DE

Last updated Jun 5, 2026

EJAP.DE (BNP Paribas Easy MSCI Japan ESG Filtered Min TE UCITS ETF) and ETLR.DE (L&G Japan Equity UCITS ETF) are both Japan Equities funds - EJAP.DE tracks the MSCI Japan ESG Filtered Min TE while ETLR.DE tracks the Solactive Core Japan Large & Mid Cap. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, EJAP.DE returned 10.25%/yr vs 9.93%/yr for ETLR.DE. With a 0.98 correlation, they move nearly in lockstep. EJAP.DE charges 0.15%/yr vs 0.10%/yr for ETLR.DE.

Performance

EJAP.DE vs. ETLR.DE - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a €10,000 investment in BNP Paribas Easy MSCI Japan ESG Filtered Min TE UCITS ETF (EJAP.DE) and L&G Japan Equity UCITS ETF (ETLR.DE). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, EJAP.DE achieves a 16.87% return, which is significantly higher than ETLR.DE's 15.36% return.

EJAP.DE

• 1D: -0.24%
• 1M: 4.05%
• YTD: 16.87%
• 6M: 16.83%
• 1Y: 30.92%
• 3Y*: 15.41%
• 5Y*: 10.25%
• 10Y*: —

ETLR.DE

• 1D: -0.30%
• 1M: 3.65%
• YTD: 15.36%
• 6M: 15.65%
• 1Y: 29.68%
• 3Y*: 15.30%
• 5Y*: 9.93%
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

EJAP.DE vs. ETLR.DE - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019
EJAP.DE BNP Paribas Easy MSCI Japan ESG Filtered Min TE UCITS ETF	16.87%	11.73%	14.53%	16.88%	-12.11%	10.01%	5.26%	16.05%
ETLR.DE L&G Japan Equity UCITS ETF	15.36%	12.36%	14.84%	16.06%	-11.99%	10.00%	5.41%	16.57%

Correlation

The correlation between EJAP.DE and ETLR.DE is 0.97 - these two move nearly in lockstep. At this level, holding both provides almost no diversification benefit. If you already own one, adding the other does little to reduce portfolio risk.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.97
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.99
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.99
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 16, 2019	0.98

The correlation between EJAP.DE and ETLR.DE has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.97 to 0.99 - a consistent structural relationship.

Return for Risk

EJAP.DE vs. ETLR.DE — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

EJAP.DE

EJAP.DE Risk / Return Rank: 51
EJAP.DE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 45
EJAP.DE Sortino Ratio Rank: 50
EJAP.DE Omega Ratio Rank: 49
EJAP.DE Calmar Ratio Rank: 59
EJAP.DE Martin Ratio Rank: 54

ETLR.DE

ETLR.DE Risk / Return Rank: 50
ETLR.DE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 45
ETLR.DE Sortino Ratio Rank: 49
ETLR.DE Omega Ratio Rank: 48
ETLR.DE Calmar Ratio Rank: 56
ETLR.DE Martin Ratio Rank: 53

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

EJAP.DE vs. ETLR.DE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for BNP Paribas Easy MSCI Japan ESG Filtered Min TE UCITS ETF (EJAP.DE) and L&G Japan Equity UCITS ETF (ETLR.DE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	EJAP.DE	ETLR.DE	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	1.56	1.56	0.00
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	2.38	2.38	0.00
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.30	1.30	0.00
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	2.86	2.74	+0.13
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	9.27	8.92	+0.34
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

EJAP.DE vs. ETLR.DE - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current EJAP.DE Sharpe Ratio is 1.56, which is comparable to the ETLR.DE Sharpe Ratio of 1.56. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of EJAP.DE and ETLR.DE, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	EJAP.DE	ETLR.DE	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	1.56	1.56	0.00
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.61	0.60	+0.01
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	-0.49	0.61	-1.10

Drawdowns

EJAP.DE vs. ETLR.DE - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum EJAP.DE drawdown since its inception was -94.44%, which is greater than ETLR.DE's maximum drawdown of -27.67%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for EJAP.DE and ETLR.DE.

Drawdown Indicators

	EJAP.DE	ETLR.DE	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-94.44%	-27.67%	-66.77%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-10.34%	-10.40%	+0.06%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-16.92%	-16.42%	-0.50%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-18.42%	-18.73%	+0.31%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-86.65%	-0.30%	-86.35%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-75.83%	-5.44%	-70.39%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	3.20%	3.20%	0.00%

Volatility

EJAP.DE vs. ETLR.DE - Volatility Comparison

BNP Paribas Easy MSCI Japan ESG Filtered Min TE UCITS ETF (EJAP.DE) has a higher volatility of 3.42% compared to L&G Japan Equity UCITS ETF (ETLR.DE) at 3.19%. This indicates that EJAP.DE's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than ETLR.DE based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	EJAP.DE	ETLR.DE	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	3.42%	3.19%	+0.23%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	15.03%	14.63%	+0.40%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	19.03%	18.30%	+0.73%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	16.64%	16.32%	+0.32%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	34.09%	16.84%	+17.25%

EJAP.DE vs. ETLR.DE - Expense Ratio Comparison

EJAP.DE has a 0.15% expense ratio, which is higher than ETLR.DE's 0.10% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.

Dividends

EJAP.DE vs. ETLR.DE - Dividend Comparison

Neither EJAP.DE nor ETLR.DE has paid dividends to shareholders.

Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both EJAP.DE and ETLR.DE in my portfolio?

With a correlation of 0.97, EJAP.DE and ETLR.DE move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

Which ETF is better, EJAP.DE or ETLR.DE?

On fees, ETLR.DE is cheaper at 0.10% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF is cheaper, EJAP.DE or ETLR.DE?

ETLR.DE is cheaper with a 0.10% expense ratio, compared with 0.15% for EJAP.DE.

What is the main difference between EJAP.DE and ETLR.DE?

EJAP.DE tracks MSCI Japan ESG Filtered Min TE, while ETLR.DE tracks Solactive Core Japan Large & Mid Cap. They also come from different issuers: BNP Paribas and Legal & General. Their fees differ too: 0.15% for EJAP.DE and 0.10% for ETLR.DE.