EITGX vs. NASDX
Compare and contrast key facts about Eaton Vance Tax Managed Growth 1.2 Fund (EITGX) and Shelton Capital Management Nasdaq-100 Index Fund Direct Shares (NASDX).
EITGX is managed by BlackRock. It was launched on Feb 28, 2001. NASDX is a passively managed fund by BlackRock that tracks the performance of the NASDAQ-100 Index. It was launched on Jan 18, 2000.
Performance
EITGX vs. NASDX - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
EITGX vs. NASDX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
EITGX Eaton Vance Tax Managed Growth 1.2 Fund | -8.48% | 16.79% | 25.27% | 28.37% | -20.01% | 24.78% | 23.13% | 29.50% | -5.19% | 22.44% |
NASDX Shelton Capital Management Nasdaq-100 Index Fund Direct Shares | -9.12% | 21.00% | 36.91% | 54.69% | -32.57% | 27.32% | 48.59% | 38.22% | -1.21% | 31.27% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, EITGX achieves a -8.48% return, which is significantly higher than NASDX's -9.12% return. Over the past 10 years, EITGX has underperformed NASDX with an annualized return of 13.20%, while NASDX has yielded a comparatively higher 19.08% annualized return.
EITGX
- 1D
- -0.15%
- 1M
- -8.02%
- YTD
- -8.48%
- 6M
- -6.29%
- 1Y
- 11.28%
- 3Y*
- 16.66%
- 5Y*
- 10.27%
- 10Y*
- 13.20%
NASDX
- 1D
- -0.79%
- 1M
- -8.02%
- YTD
- -9.12%
- 6M
- -6.79%
- 1Y
- 19.59%
- 3Y*
- 24.51%
- 5Y*
- 14.42%
- 10Y*
- 19.08%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
EITGX vs. NASDX - Expense Ratio Comparison
Both EITGX and NASDX have an expense ratio of 0.63%.
Return for Risk
EITGX vs. NASDX — Risk / Return Rank
EITGX
NASDX
EITGX vs. NASDX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Eaton Vance Tax Managed Growth 1.2 Fund (EITGX) and Shelton Capital Management Nasdaq-100 Index Fund Direct Shares (NASDX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| EITGX | NASDX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 0.66 | 0.88 | -0.22 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 1.06 | 1.40 | -0.34 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.16 | 1.20 | -0.04 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 0.81 | 1.31 | -0.50 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 3.49 | 5.01 | -1.52 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| EITGX | NASDX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.66 | 0.88 | -0.22 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.60 | 0.63 | -0.03 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.72 | 0.85 | -0.12 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.44 | 0.29 | +0.15 |
Correlation
The correlation between EITGX and NASDX is 0.89, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.
Dividends
EITGX vs. NASDX - Dividend Comparison
EITGX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.57%, less than NASDX's 3.93% yield.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
EITGX Eaton Vance Tax Managed Growth 1.2 Fund | 2.57% | 2.35% | 1.74% | 0.67% | 0.74% | 0.39% | 0.69% | 0.92% | 1.04% | 0.97% | 1.14% | 1.18% |
NASDX Shelton Capital Management Nasdaq-100 Index Fund Direct Shares | 3.93% | 3.76% | 16.95% | 7.61% | 3.75% | 2.59% | 1.28% | 7.09% | 2.47% | 1.65% | 0.75% | 0.85% |
Drawdowns
EITGX vs. NASDX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum EITGX drawdown since its inception was -51.96%, smaller than the maximum NASDX drawdown of -83.16%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for EITGX and NASDX.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| EITGX | NASDX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -51.96% | -83.16% | +31.20% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -11.71% | -12.70% | +0.99% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -25.96% | -35.33% | +9.37% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -32.97% | -35.33% | +2.36% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -10.53% | -11.90% | +1.37% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -8.18% | -34.59% | +26.41% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.72% | 3.32% | -0.60% |
Volatility
EITGX vs. NASDX - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Eaton Vance Tax Managed Growth 1.2 Fund (EITGX) is 4.51%, while Shelton Capital Management Nasdaq-100 Index Fund Direct Shares (NASDX) has a volatility of 5.38%. This indicates that EITGX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than NASDX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| EITGX | NASDX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 4.51% | 5.38% | -0.87% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 9.07% | 12.45% | -3.38% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 18.24% | 22.55% | -4.31% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 17.27% | 23.03% | -5.76% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 18.29% | 22.61% | -4.32% |