EITGX vs. BPTRX
Compare and contrast key facts about Eaton Vance Tax Managed Growth 1.2 Fund (EITGX) and Baron Partners Fund (BPTRX).
EITGX is managed by BlackRock. It was launched on Feb 28, 2001. BPTRX is managed by Baron Capital Group, Inc.. It was launched on Apr 30, 2003.
Performance
EITGX vs. BPTRX - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
EITGX vs. BPTRX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
EITGX Eaton Vance Tax Managed Growth 1.2 Fund | -5.59% | 16.79% | 25.27% | 28.37% | -20.01% | 24.78% | 23.13% | 29.50% | -5.19% | 22.44% |
BPTRX Baron Partners Fund | -5.39% | 24.54% | 32.75% | 43.09% | -42.53% | 31.35% | 148.81% | 44.99% | -2.01% | 31.54% |
Returns By Period
The year-to-date returns for both investments are quite close, with EITGX having a -5.59% return and BPTRX slightly higher at -5.39%. Over the past 10 years, EITGX has underperformed BPTRX with an annualized return of 13.56%, while BPTRX has yielded a comparatively higher 23.66% annualized return.
EITGX
- 1D
- 3.16%
- 1M
- -5.07%
- YTD
- -5.59%
- 6M
- -3.37%
- 1Y
- 14.39%
- 3Y*
- 17.88%
- 5Y*
- 10.68%
- 10Y*
- 13.56%
BPTRX
- 1D
- 2.10%
- 1M
- -5.26%
- YTD
- -5.39%
- 6M
- 11.85%
- 1Y
- 41.12%
- 3Y*
- 21.98%
- 5Y*
- 10.95%
- 10Y*
- 23.66%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
EITGX vs. BPTRX - Expense Ratio Comparison
EITGX has a 0.63% expense ratio, which is lower than BPTRX's 1.36% expense ratio.
Return for Risk
EITGX vs. BPTRX — Risk / Return Rank
EITGX
BPTRX
EITGX vs. BPTRX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Eaton Vance Tax Managed Growth 1.2 Fund (EITGX) and Baron Partners Fund (BPTRX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| EITGX | BPTRX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 0.80 | 1.29 | -0.48 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 1.28 | 2.38 | -1.10 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.19 | 1.30 | -0.11 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.32 | 2.85 | -1.54 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 5.60 | 10.35 | -4.75 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| EITGX | BPTRX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.80 | 1.29 | -0.48 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.62 | 0.32 | +0.29 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.74 | 0.73 | +0.02 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.45 | 0.55 | -0.10 |
Correlation
The correlation between EITGX and BPTRX is 0.74, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.
Dividends
EITGX vs. BPTRX - Dividend Comparison
EITGX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.49%, less than BPTRX's 3.55% yield.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
EITGX Eaton Vance Tax Managed Growth 1.2 Fund | 2.49% | 2.35% | 1.74% | 0.67% | 0.74% | 0.39% | 0.69% | 0.92% | 1.04% | 0.97% | 1.14% | 1.18% |
BPTRX Baron Partners Fund | 3.55% | 3.36% | 0.76% | 0.00% | 3.19% | 7.72% | 3.67% | 0.26% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.35% |
Drawdowns
EITGX vs. BPTRX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum EITGX drawdown since its inception was -51.96%, smaller than the maximum BPTRX drawdown of -64.11%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for EITGX and BPTRX.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| EITGX | BPTRX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -51.96% | -64.11% | +12.15% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -11.71% | -14.79% | +3.08% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -25.96% | -49.87% | +23.91% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -32.97% | -51.26% | +18.29% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -7.71% | -8.65% | +0.94% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -8.18% | -13.82% | +5.64% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.76% | 4.08% | -1.32% |
Volatility
EITGX vs. BPTRX - Volatility Comparison
Eaton Vance Tax Managed Growth 1.2 Fund (EITGX) has a higher volatility of 5.71% compared to Baron Partners Fund (BPTRX) at 4.78%. This indicates that EITGX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than BPTRX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| EITGX | BPTRX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 5.71% | 4.78% | +0.93% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 9.61% | 22.21% | -12.60% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 18.47% | 33.35% | -14.88% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 17.33% | 33.90% | -16.57% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 18.31% | 32.72% | -14.41% |