EISMX vs. WWNPX
Compare and contrast key facts about Eaton Vance Atlanta Capital SMID-Cap Fund (EISMX) and Kinetics Paradigm Fund (WWNPX).
EISMX is managed by Eaton Vance. It was launched on Apr 30, 2002. WWNPX is managed by Kinetics. It was launched on Dec 31, 1999.
Performance
EISMX vs. WWNPX - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
EISMX vs. WWNPX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
EISMX Eaton Vance Atlanta Capital SMID-Cap Fund | -4.80% | -5.66% | 17.64% | 14.01% | -8.77% | 22.02% | 11.31% | 34.37% | -5.55% | 24.71% |
WWNPX Kinetics Paradigm Fund | 38.76% | -14.61% | 88.34% | -16.97% | 29.18% | 38.14% | 3.38% | 30.47% | -5.24% | 28.41% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, EISMX achieves a -4.80% return, which is significantly lower than WWNPX's 38.76% return. Over the past 10 years, EISMX has underperformed WWNPX with an annualized return of 9.69%, while WWNPX has yielded a comparatively higher 20.72% annualized return.
EISMX
- 1D
- 2.04%
- 1M
- -8.00%
- YTD
- -4.80%
- 6M
- -5.24%
- 1Y
- -6.26%
- 3Y*
- 6.06%
- 5Y*
- 4.03%
- 10Y*
- 9.69%
WWNPX
- 1D
- 1.54%
- 1M
- -9.22%
- YTD
- 38.76%
- 6M
- 23.34%
- 1Y
- 3.39%
- 3Y*
- 30.92%
- 5Y*
- 16.21%
- 10Y*
- 20.72%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
EISMX vs. WWNPX - Expense Ratio Comparison
EISMX has a 0.88% expense ratio, which is lower than WWNPX's 1.64% expense ratio.
Return for Risk
EISMX vs. WWNPX — Risk / Return Rank
EISMX
WWNPX
EISMX vs. WWNPX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Eaton Vance Atlanta Capital SMID-Cap Fund (EISMX) and Kinetics Paradigm Fund (WWNPX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| EISMX | WWNPX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.31 | 0.15 | -0.45 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.33 | 0.46 | -0.79 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 0.96 | 1.06 | -0.10 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.36 | 0.20 | -0.56 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -0.82 | 0.32 | -1.14 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| EISMX | WWNPX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.31 | 0.15 | -0.45 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.24 | 0.50 | -0.26 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.52 | 0.74 | -0.22 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.53 | 0.55 | -0.03 |
Correlation
The correlation between EISMX and WWNPX is 0.68, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.
Dividends
EISMX vs. WWNPX - Dividend Comparison
EISMX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 6.75%, more than WWNPX's 5.92% yield.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
EISMX Eaton Vance Atlanta Capital SMID-Cap Fund | 6.75% | 6.43% | 7.26% | 2.78% | 10.37% | 10.49% | 9.80% | 6.52% | 7.20% | 3.30% | 3.58% | 6.70% |
WWNPX Kinetics Paradigm Fund | 5.92% | 8.21% | 2.95% | 5.65% | 2.00% | 1.67% | 2.15% | 1.00% | 10.44% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Drawdowns
EISMX vs. WWNPX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum EISMX drawdown since its inception was -45.32%, smaller than the maximum WWNPX drawdown of -67.87%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for EISMX and WWNPX.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| EISMX | WWNPX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -45.32% | -67.87% | +22.55% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -14.66% | -32.61% | +17.95% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -19.81% | -41.13% | +21.32% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -39.95% | -43.51% | +3.56% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -15.38% | -15.90% | +0.52% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -5.77% | -13.85% | +8.08% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 6.43% | 20.16% | -13.73% |
Volatility
EISMX vs. WWNPX - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Eaton Vance Atlanta Capital SMID-Cap Fund (EISMX) is 4.80%, while Kinetics Paradigm Fund (WWNPX) has a volatility of 9.22%. This indicates that EISMX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than WWNPX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| EISMX | WWNPX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 4.80% | 9.22% | -4.42% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 11.30% | 24.58% | -13.28% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 18.96% | 36.48% | -17.52% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 17.09% | 32.56% | -15.47% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 18.83% | 28.17% | -9.34% |