EIRAX vs. EIHMX
Compare and contrast key facts about Eaton Vance Richard Bernstein All Asset Strategy Fund (EIRAX) and Eaton Vance National Municipal Income Fund Class I (EIHMX).
EIRAX is managed by Eaton Vance. It was launched on Sep 29, 2011. EIHMX is an actively managed fund by Eaton Vance. It was launched on Dec 3, 1993.
Performance
EIRAX vs. EIHMX - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
EIRAX vs. EIHMX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
EIRAX Eaton Vance Richard Bernstein All Asset Strategy Fund | -1.78% | 12.89% | 7.68% | 6.80% | -14.73% | 7.22% | 9.83% | 16.28% | -7.47% | 15.02% |
EIHMX Eaton Vance National Municipal Income Fund Class I | -0.23% | 3.93% | 2.56% | 7.23% | -9.70% | 1.73% | 6.06% | 8.74% | 2.04% | 4.95% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, EIRAX achieves a -1.78% return, which is significantly lower than EIHMX's -0.23% return. Over the past 10 years, EIRAX has outperformed EIHMX with an annualized return of 5.51%, while EIHMX has yielded a comparatively lower 2.65% annualized return.
EIRAX
- 1D
- 2.11%
- 1M
- -4.80%
- YTD
- -1.78%
- 6M
- 0.83%
- 1Y
- 10.73%
- 3Y*
- 6.83%
- 5Y*
- 2.60%
- 10Y*
- 5.51%
EIHMX
- 1D
- 0.22%
- 1M
- -2.17%
- YTD
- -0.23%
- 6M
- 1.34%
- 1Y
- 3.55%
- 3Y*
- 3.42%
- 5Y*
- 1.00%
- 10Y*
- 2.65%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
EIRAX vs. EIHMX - Expense Ratio Comparison
EIRAX has a 0.93% expense ratio, which is higher than EIHMX's 0.41% expense ratio.
Return for Risk
EIRAX vs. EIHMX — Risk / Return Rank
EIRAX
EIHMX
EIRAX vs. EIHMX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Eaton Vance Richard Bernstein All Asset Strategy Fund (EIRAX) and Eaton Vance National Municipal Income Fund Class I (EIHMX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| EIRAX | EIHMX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 1.11 | 0.71 | +0.40 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 1.63 | 0.98 | +0.64 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.23 | 1.20 | +0.03 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.46 | 0.91 | +0.55 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 6.43 | 2.59 | +3.85 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| EIRAX | EIHMX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.11 | 0.71 | +0.40 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.30 | 0.22 | +0.08 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.61 | 0.61 | +0.01 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.61 | 0.72 | -0.11 |
Correlation
The correlation between EIRAX and EIHMX is 0.09, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.
Dividends
EIRAX vs. EIHMX - Dividend Comparison
EIRAX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.85%, less than EIHMX's 4.02% yield.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
EIRAX Eaton Vance Richard Bernstein All Asset Strategy Fund | 2.85% | 2.80% | 2.35% | 2.58% | 1.11% | 5.68% | 3.13% | 7.42% | 2.98% | 2.35% | 0.73% | 1.59% |
EIHMX Eaton Vance National Municipal Income Fund Class I | 4.02% | 4.99% | 4.38% | 3.21% | 3.30% | 2.40% | 2.90% | 3.88% | 3.87% | 3.90% | 4.10% | 4.12% |
Drawdowns
EIRAX vs. EIHMX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum EIRAX drawdown since its inception was -19.85%, smaller than the maximum EIHMX drawdown of -39.87%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for EIRAX and EIHMX.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| EIRAX | EIHMX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -19.85% | -39.87% | +20.02% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -7.73% | -5.46% | -2.27% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -19.85% | -15.32% | -4.53% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -19.85% | -15.32% | -4.53% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -5.79% | -2.49% | -3.30% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -3.86% | -3.52% | -0.34% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 1.75% | 1.91% | -0.16% |
Volatility
EIRAX vs. EIHMX - Volatility Comparison
Eaton Vance Richard Bernstein All Asset Strategy Fund (EIRAX) has a higher volatility of 4.63% compared to Eaton Vance National Municipal Income Fund Class I (EIHMX) at 1.28%. This indicates that EIRAX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than EIHMX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| EIRAX | EIHMX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 4.63% | 1.28% | +3.35% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 6.91% | 1.98% | +4.93% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 10.04% | 5.72% | +4.32% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 8.69% | 4.64% | +4.05% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 9.06% | 4.40% | +4.66% |