EIPX vs. VOLT
EIPX (FT Energy Income Partners Strategy ETF) and VOLT (Tema Electrification ETF) are both Energy Equities funds. Both are actively managed. Over the past year, EIPX returned 30.04% vs 65.79% for VOLT. At a 0.44 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. EIPX charges 0.95%/yr vs 0.75%/yr for VOLT.
Performance
EIPX vs. VOLT - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, EIPX achieves a 21.96% return, which is significantly lower than VOLT's 37.23% return.
EIPX
- 1D
- 0.19%
- 1M
- -2.12%
- YTD
- 21.96%
- 6M
- 19.46%
- 1Y
- 30.04%
- 3Y*
- 21.12%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
VOLT
- 1D
- 0.16%
- 1M
- -2.25%
- YTD
- 37.23%
- 6M
- 34.70%
- 1Y
- 65.79%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
EIPX vs. VOLT - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | |
|---|---|---|---|
EIPX FT Energy Income Partners Strategy ETF | 21.96% | 11.44% | -4.24% |
VOLT Tema Electrification ETF | 37.23% | 25.92% | -8.86% |
Correlation
The correlation between EIPX and VOLT is 0.29, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.29 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 5, 2024 | 0.44 |
The correlation between EIPX and VOLT shifts across timeframes, from 0.29 (1 year) to 0.44 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
EIPX vs. VOLT - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
EIPX
VOLT
Energy
Utilities
Industrials
Technology
Basic Materials
-
-
Communication Services
-
-
Consumer Cyclical
-
Consumer Defensive
-
-
Financial Services
-
Healthcare
-
-
Real Estate
-
-
Energy
EIPX
VOLT
Utilities
EIPX
VOLT
Industrials
EIPX
VOLT
Technology
EIPX
VOLT
Basic Materials
EIPX
-
VOLT
-
Communication Services
EIPX
-
VOLT
-
Consumer Cyclical
EIPX
-
VOLT
Consumer Defensive
EIPX
-
VOLT
-
Financial Services
EIPX
-
VOLT
Healthcare
EIPX
-
VOLT
-
Real Estate
EIPX
-
VOLT
-
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
EIPX vs. VOLT — Risk / Return Rank
EIPX
VOLT
EIPX vs. VOLT - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for FT Energy Income Partners Strategy ETF (EIPX) and Tema Electrification ETF (VOLT). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| EIPX | VOLT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.54 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.25 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.46 | 1.53 | -0.07 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 7.32 | 7.38 | -0.05 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 20.31 | 20.55 | -0.24 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| EIPX | VOLT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.71 | 3.25 | -0.54 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 1.20 | 1.49 | -0.29 |
Drawdowns
EIPX vs. VOLT - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum EIPX drawdown since its inception was -15.43%, smaller than the maximum VOLT drawdown of -23.40%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for EIPX and VOLT.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| EIPX | VOLT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -15.43% | -23.40% | +7.97% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -4.12% | -8.96% | +4.84% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -15.43% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -2.58% | -4.12% | +1.54% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -2.27% | -5.17% | +2.90% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 1.49% | 3.21% | -1.72% |
Volatility
EIPX vs. VOLT - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for FT Energy Income Partners Strategy ETF (EIPX) is 4.01%, while Tema Electrification ETF (VOLT) has a volatility of 7.84%. This indicates that EIPX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than VOLT based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| EIPX | VOLT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 4.01% | 7.84% | -3.83% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 8.50% | 17.12% | -8.62% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 11.17% | 20.39% | -9.22% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 15.06% | 24.11% | -9.05% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 15.06% | 24.11% | -9.05% |
EIPX vs. VOLT - Expense Ratio Comparison
EIPX has a 0.95% expense ratio, which is higher than VOLT's 0.75% expense ratio.
Dividends
EIPX vs. VOLT - Dividend Comparison
EIPX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.68%, more than VOLT's 0.33% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
EIPX FT Energy Income Partners Strategy ETF | 2.68% | 3.23% | 3.27% | 3.48% | 0.34% |
VOLT Tema Electrification ETF | 0.33% | 0.46% | 0.01% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
EIPX and VOLT have a correlation of 0.29, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
VOLT has higher volatility (7.84%) compared to EIPX (4.01%). In terms of maximum drawdown, EIPX dropped -15.43% vs VOLT's -23.40%.
On 1-year performance, VOLT leads with 65.79% vs 30.04% for EIPX. On fees, VOLT is cheaper at 0.75% per year. On volatility, EIPX has been the lower-risk option at 4.01%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 1-year period, VOLT has performed better with a 65.79% return vs 30.04%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
VOLT is cheaper with a 0.75% expense ratio, compared with 0.95% for EIPX.
EIPX has the higher dividend yield at 2.68%, compared with 0.33% for VOLT.
They also come from different issuers: First Trust and Tema. Their fees differ too: 0.95% for EIPX and 0.75% for VOLT.
VOLT currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (3.25 vs 2.71), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for EIPX and VOLT
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer