EIPX vs. CRAK

Last updated Aug 2, 2026

EIPX (FT Energy Income Partners Strategy ETF) and CRAK (VanEck Oil Refiners ETF) are both Energy Equities funds. EIPX is actively managed, while CRAK is passively managed. Over the past 3 years, EIPX returned 19.41%/yr vs 23.11%/yr for CRAK. Their 0.65 correlation means they have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently. EIPX charges 0.95%/yr vs 0.62%/yr for CRAK.

Performance

EIPX vs. CRAK - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in FT Energy Income Partners Strategy ETF (EIPX) and VanEck Oil Refiners ETF (CRAK). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, EIPX achieves a 24.74% return, which is significantly lower than CRAK's 47.28% return.

EIPX

• 1D: 0.49%
• 1M: 3.77%
• 6M: 14.96%
• YTD: 24.74%
• 1Y: 29.89%
• 3Y*: 19.41%
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —
• ALL TIME*: 18.15%

CRAK

• 1D: -1.04%
• 1M: 16.39%
• 6M: 31.77%
• YTD: 47.28%
• 1Y: 70.85%
• 3Y*: 23.11%
• 5Y*: 19.01%
• 10Y*: 14.65%
• ALL TIME*: 12.82%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison

Position	Avg. Volume Value (2W)	Avg. Volume Value (1M)	Avg. Volume Value (3M)
CRAK VanEck Oil Refiners ETF	$24.74M	$18.05M	$9.17M
EIPX FT Energy Income Partners Strategy ETF	$1.76M	$1.94M	$1.35M

EIPX vs. CRAK - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022
EIPX FT Energy Income Partners Strategy ETF	24.74%	11.44%	19.11%	10.74%	1.77%
CRAK VanEck Oil Refiners ETF	47.28%	39.11%	-15.05%	13.73%	5.64%

Correlation

The correlation between EIPX and CRAK is 0.52, which is moderate. They have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently, sharing some price drivers without tracking each other closely.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.	0.52
Correlation (3Y) Balances recent behavior with more history.	0.60
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 3, 2022	0.65

The correlation between EIPX and CRAK shifts across timeframes, from 0.52 (1 year) to 0.65 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

EIPX vs. CRAK - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	EIPX	CRAK
Energy	68.3%	95.0%
Utilities	27.0%	-
Industrials	4.5%	3.7%
Technology	0.3%	-
Basic Materials	-	1.2%
Communication Services	-	-
Consumer Cyclical	-	-
Consumer Defensive	-	-
Financial Services	-	-
Healthcare	-	-
Real Estate	-	-

Return for Risk

EIPX vs. CRAK — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

EIPX

EIPX Risk / Return Rank: 93
EIPX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 93
EIPX Sortino Ratio Rank: 93
EIPX Omega Ratio Rank: 91
EIPX Calmar Ratio Rank: 95
EIPX Martin Ratio Rank: 92

CRAK

CRAK Risk / Return Rank: 95
CRAK Sharpe Ratio Rank: 97
CRAK Sortino Ratio Rank: 96
CRAK Omega Ratio Rank: 95
CRAK Calmar Ratio Rank: 94
CRAK Martin Ratio Rank: 93

The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

EIPX vs. CRAK - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for FT Energy Income Partners Strategy ETF (EIPX) and VanEck Oil Refiners ETF (CRAK). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	EIPX	CRAK	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	2.51	3.39	-0.88
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	3.59	4.31	-0.72
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.43	1.55	-0.12
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	5.56	5.01	+0.55
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	15.59	16.54	-0.96

EIPX vs. CRAK - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current EIPX Sharpe Ratio is 2.51, which is comparable to the CRAK Sharpe Ratio of 3.39. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of EIPX and CRAK, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

EIPX vs. CRAK - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum EIPX drawdown since its inception was -15.43%, smaller than the maximum CRAK drawdown of -58.80%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for EIPX and CRAK.

Drawdown Indicators

	EIPX	CRAK	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-15.43%	-58.80%	+43.37%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-5.17%	-13.59%	+8.42%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-15.43%	-35.61%	+20.18%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	—	-35.61%	—
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	—	-58.80%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-0.94%	-1.04%	+0.10%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-2.28%	-12.39%	+10.11%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	1.85%	4.11%	-2.26%

Volatility

EIPX vs. CRAK - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for FT Energy Income Partners Strategy ETF (EIPX) is 3.45%, while VanEck Oil Refiners ETF (CRAK) has a volatility of 6.59%. This indicates that EIPX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than CRAK based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	EIPX	CRAK	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	3.45%	6.59%	-3.14%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	8.73%	16.11%	-7.38%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	11.44%	20.11%	-8.67%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	14.95%	20.75%	-5.80%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	14.95%	22.24%	-7.29%

EIPX vs. CRAK - Expense Ratio Comparison

EIPX has a 0.95% expense ratio, which is higher than CRAK's 0.62% expense ratio.

Dividends

EIPX vs. CRAK - Dividend Comparison

EIPX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.69%, more than CRAK's 1.37% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
CRAK VanEck Oil Refiners ETF	1.37%	2.02%	5.60%	3.65%	3.08%	2.40%	2.64%	1.49%	2.42%	1.66%	3.42%	0.47%
EIPX FT Energy Income Partners Strategy ETF	2.69%	3.23%	3.27%	3.48%	0.34%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both EIPX and CRAK in my portfolio?

EIPX and CRAK have a correlation of 0.52, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, EIPX or CRAK?

CRAK has higher volatility (6.59%) compared to EIPX (3.45%). In terms of maximum drawdown, EIPX dropped -15.43% vs CRAK's -58.80%.

Which ETF is better, EIPX or CRAK?

On 3-year performance, CRAK leads with 23.11% vs 19.41% for EIPX. On fees, CRAK is cheaper at 0.62% per year. On volatility, EIPX has been the lower-risk option at 3.45%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, EIPX or CRAK?

Over the 3-year period, CRAK has performed better with a 23.11% return vs 19.41%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, EIPX or CRAK?

CRAK is cheaper with a 0.62% expense ratio, compared with 0.95% for EIPX.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, EIPX or CRAK?

EIPX has the higher dividend yield at 2.69%, compared with 1.37% for CRAK.

What is the main difference between EIPX and CRAK?

They also come from different issuers: First Trust and VanEck. Their fees differ too: 0.95% for EIPX and 0.62% for CRAK.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

CRAK currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (3.39 vs 2.51), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.