EIPIX vs. CSUIX
Compare and contrast key facts about EIP Growth and Income Fund (NEW) (EIPIX) and Cohen & Steers Global Infrastructure Fund, Inc. (CSUIX).
EIPIX is managed by EIP Funds. It was launched on Aug 21, 2006. CSUIX is managed by Cohen & Steers. It was launched on May 2, 2004.
Performance
EIPIX vs. CSUIX - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
EIPIX vs. CSUIX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
EIPIX EIP Growth and Income Fund (NEW) | 18.42% | 11.31% | 26.74% | 6.25% | 16.19% | 21.80% | -9.85% | 23.09% | -11.68% | -0.68% |
CSUIX Cohen & Steers Global Infrastructure Fund, Inc. | 9.43% | 14.69% | 8.74% | 2.46% | -4.89% | 16.60% | -1.29% | 24.72% | -5.52% | 18.15% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, EIPIX achieves a 18.42% return, which is significantly higher than CSUIX's 9.43% return.
EIPIX
- 1D
- -0.45%
- 1M
- 0.59%
- YTD
- 18.42%
- 6M
- 19.09%
- 1Y
- 22.63%
- 3Y*
- 20.90%
- 5Y*
- 18.00%
- 10Y*
- —
CSUIX
- 1D
- 0.91%
- 1M
- -3.21%
- YTD
- 9.43%
- 6M
- 10.11%
- 1Y
- 18.84%
- 3Y*
- 11.52%
- 5Y*
- 8.29%
- 10Y*
- 7.93%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
EIPIX vs. CSUIX - Expense Ratio Comparison
EIPIX has a 1.25% expense ratio, which is higher than CSUIX's 0.86% expense ratio.
Return for Risk
EIPIX vs. CSUIX — Risk / Return Rank
EIPIX
CSUIX
EIPIX vs. CSUIX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for EIP Growth and Income Fund (NEW) (EIPIX) and Cohen & Steers Global Infrastructure Fund, Inc. (CSUIX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| EIPIX | CSUIX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 1.63 | 1.71 | -0.08 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 2.09 | 2.27 | -0.18 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.34 | 1.33 | +0.01 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.90 | 2.50 | -0.60 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 8.90 | 10.88 | -1.98 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| EIPIX | CSUIX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.63 | 1.71 | -0.08 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 1.16 | 0.65 | +0.51 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | — | 0.53 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.54 | 0.58 | -0.04 |
Correlation
The correlation between EIPIX and CSUIX is 0.74, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.
Dividends
EIPIX vs. CSUIX - Dividend Comparison
EIPIX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 13.27%, more than CSUIX's 7.69% yield.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
EIPIX EIP Growth and Income Fund (NEW) | 13.27% | 15.71% | 7.60% | 4.09% | 25.10% | 3.44% | 4.02% | 3.44% | 3.45% | 1.77% | 0.78% | 0.00% |
CSUIX Cohen & Steers Global Infrastructure Fund, Inc. | 7.69% | 8.41% | 2.58% | 2.53% | 3.91% | 3.25% | 1.64% | 1.83% | 2.45% | 5.12% | 2.35% | 6.52% |
Drawdowns
EIPIX vs. CSUIX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum EIPIX drawdown since its inception was -43.98%, smaller than the maximum CSUIX drawdown of -52.01%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for EIPIX and CSUIX.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| EIPIX | CSUIX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -43.98% | -52.01% | +8.03% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -12.61% | -7.99% | -4.62% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -16.71% | -20.01% | +3.30% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -35.01% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.60% | -3.49% | +2.89% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -5.09% | -8.21% | +3.12% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.69% | 1.84% | +0.85% |
Volatility
EIPIX vs. CSUIX - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for EIP Growth and Income Fund (NEW) (EIPIX) is 2.83%, while Cohen & Steers Global Infrastructure Fund, Inc. (CSUIX) has a volatility of 3.43%. This indicates that EIPIX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than CSUIX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| EIPIX | CSUIX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 2.83% | 3.43% | -0.60% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 7.30% | 6.90% | +0.40% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 14.38% | 11.49% | +2.89% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 15.63% | 12.87% | +2.76% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 18.84% | 14.88% | +3.96% |