EIPI vs. SPIN

Last updated Aug 4, 2026

EIPI (FT Energy Income Partners Enhanced Income ETF) and SPIN (State Street US Equity Premium Income ETF) are both Derivative Income funds. Both are actively managed. Over the past year, EIPI returned 21.32% vs 16.02% for SPIN. Their 0.17 correlation means their historical movements had little consistent relationship. EIPI charges 1.11%/yr vs 0.25%/yr for SPIN.

Performance

EIPI vs. SPIN - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in FT Energy Income Partners Enhanced Income ETF (EIPI) and State Street US Equity Premium Income ETF (SPIN). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, EIPI achieves a 16.85% return, which is significantly higher than SPIN's 5.55% return.

EIPI

• 1D: -0.36%
• 1M: 2.40%
• 6M: 10.89%
• YTD: 16.85%
• 1Y: 21.32%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —
• ALL TIME*: 19.31%

SPIN

• 1D: 1.53%
• 1M: 2.70%
• 6M: 3.96%
• YTD: 5.55%
• 1Y: 16.02%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —
• ALL TIME*: 13.94%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison

Position	Avg. Volume Value (2W)	Avg. Volume Value (1M)	Avg. Volume Value (3M)
EIPI FT Energy Income Partners Enhanced Income ETF	$3.85M	$2.89M	$2.18M
SPIN State Street US Equity Premium Income ETF	$98.77K	$151.14K	$120.62K

EIPI vs. SPIN - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024
EIPI FT Energy Income Partners Enhanced Income ETF	16.85%	12.38%	5.97%
SPIN State Street US Equity Premium Income ETF	5.55%	14.14%	6.47%

Correlation

The correlation between EIPI and SPIN is 0.00, meaning there was essentially no consistent relationship between their historical price movements. Each responded to its own set of market drivers.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.	0.00
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 5, 2024	0.17

The correlation between EIPI and SPIN shifts across timeframes, from 0.00 (1 year) to 0.17 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

EIPI vs. SPIN - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	EIPI	SPIN
Energy	62.6%	2.5%
Utilities	32.1%	1.9%
Industrials	4.7%	8.6%
Basic Materials	0.7%	2.4%
Communication Services	-	11.1%
Consumer Cyclical	-	8.2%
Consumer Defensive	-	3.7%
Financial Services	-	12.3%
Healthcare	-	8.7%
Real Estate	-	1.5%
Technology	-	39.0%

Return for Risk

EIPI vs. SPIN — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

EIPI

EIPI Risk / Return Rank: 87
EIPI Sharpe Ratio Rank: 86
EIPI Sortino Ratio Rank: 89
EIPI Omega Ratio Rank: 82
EIPI Calmar Ratio Rank: 92
EIPI Martin Ratio Rank: 86

SPIN

SPIN Risk / Return Rank: 52
SPIN Sharpe Ratio Rank: 55
SPIN Sortino Ratio Rank: 53
SPIN Omega Ratio Rank: 55
SPIN Calmar Ratio Rank: 44
SPIN Martin Ratio Rank: 53

The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

EIPI vs. SPIN - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for FT Energy Income Partners Enhanced Income ETF (EIPI) and State Street US Equity Premium Income ETF (SPIN). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	EIPI	SPIN	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	2.12	1.38	+0.74
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	3.16	1.95	+1.21
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.36	1.25	+0.11
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	4.49	1.64	+2.85
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	12.97	6.56	+6.41

EIPI vs. SPIN - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current EIPI Sharpe Ratio is 2.12, which is higher than the SPIN Sharpe Ratio of 1.38. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of EIPI and SPIN, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

EIPI vs. SPIN - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum EIPI drawdown since its inception was -12.33%, smaller than the maximum SPIN drawdown of -16.85%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for EIPI and SPIN.

Drawdown Indicators

	EIPI	SPIN	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-12.33%	-16.85%	+4.52%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-4.77%	-9.81%	+5.04%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-1.41%	0.00%	-1.41%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-1.70%	-2.21%	+0.51%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	1.65%	2.45%	-0.80%

Volatility

EIPI vs. SPIN - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for FT Energy Income Partners Enhanced Income ETF (EIPI) is 3.51%, while State Street US Equity Premium Income ETF (SPIN) has a volatility of 3.70%. This indicates that EIPI experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than SPIN based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	EIPI	SPIN	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	3.51%	3.70%	-0.19%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	7.86%	8.88%	-1.02%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	10.11%	11.67%	-1.56%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	13.01%	14.28%	-1.27%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	13.01%	14.28%	-1.27%

EIPI vs. SPIN - Expense Ratio Comparison

EIPI has a 1.11% expense ratio, which is higher than SPIN's 0.25% expense ratio.

Dividends

EIPI vs. SPIN - Dividend Comparison

EIPI's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 6.72%, more than SPIN's 4.89% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024
EIPI FT Energy Income Partners Enhanced Income ETF	6.72%	9.71%	6.31%
SPIN State Street US Equity Premium Income ETF	4.89%	8.20%	2.36%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both EIPI and SPIN in my portfolio?

EIPI and SPIN have a correlation of 0.00, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, EIPI or SPIN?

SPIN has higher volatility (3.70%) compared to EIPI (3.51%). In terms of maximum drawdown, EIPI dropped -12.33% vs SPIN's -16.85%.

Which ETF is better, EIPI or SPIN?

On 1-year performance, EIPI leads with 21.32% vs 16.02% for SPIN. On fees, SPIN is cheaper at 0.25% per year. On volatility, EIPI has been the lower-risk option at 3.51%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, EIPI or SPIN?

Over the 1-year period, EIPI has performed better with a 21.32% return vs 16.02%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, EIPI or SPIN?

SPIN is cheaper with a 0.25% expense ratio, compared with 1.11% for EIPI.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, EIPI or SPIN?

EIPI has the higher dividend yield at 6.72%, compared with 4.89% for SPIN.

What is the main difference between EIPI and SPIN?

They also come from different issuers: First Trust and State Street. Their fees differ too: 1.11% for EIPI and 0.25% for SPIN.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

EIPI currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.12 vs 1.38), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.