PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
EIPI vs. SPIN
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

EIPI vs. SPIN - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in FT Energy Income Partners Enhanced Income ETF (EIPI) and State Street US Equity Premium Income ETF (SPIN). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, EIPI achieves a 16.72% return, which is significantly higher than SPIN's 3.23% return.


EIPI

1D
1.40%
1M
1.71%
6M
16.37%
YTD
16.72%
1Y
22.83%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

SPIN

1D
-0.69%
1M
2.36%
6M
1.40%
YTD
3.23%
1Y
14.70%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

EIPI vs. SPIN - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024
EIPI
FT Energy Income Partners Enhanced Income ETF
16.72%12.38%5.97%
SPIN
State Street US Equity Premium Income ETF
3.23%14.14%6.47%

Correlation

The correlation between EIPI and SPIN is 0.02, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.02

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 5, 2024

0.18

The correlation between EIPI and SPIN shifts across timeframes, from 0.02 (1 year) to 0.18 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

EIPI vs. SPIN - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
EIPI
SPIN

Energy

63.2%
2.7%

Utilities

31.3%
2.2%

Industrials

4.9%
8.1%

Basic Materials

0.7%
2.3%

Communication Services

-

11.9%

Consumer Cyclical

-

8.6%

Consumer Defensive

-

3.6%

Financial Services

-

11.3%

Healthcare

-

8.3%

Real Estate

-

1.5%

Technology

-

39.6%

Energy

EIPI
63.2%
SPIN
2.7%

Utilities

EIPI
31.3%
SPIN
2.2%

Industrials

EIPI
4.9%
SPIN
8.1%

Basic Materials

EIPI
0.7%
SPIN
2.3%

Communication Services

EIPI

-

SPIN
11.9%

Consumer Cyclical

EIPI

-

SPIN
8.6%

Consumer Defensive

EIPI

-

SPIN
3.6%

Financial Services

EIPI

-

SPIN
11.3%

Healthcare

EIPI

-

SPIN
8.3%

Real Estate

EIPI

-

SPIN
1.5%

Technology

EIPI

-

SPIN
39.6%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

EIPI vs. SPIN — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

EIPI
EIPI Risk / Return Rank: 8888
Overall Rank
EIPI Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8888
Sharpe Ratio Rank
EIPI Sortino Ratio Rank: 9191
Sortino Ratio Rank
EIPI Omega Ratio Rank: 8282
Omega Ratio Rank
EIPI Calmar Ratio Rank: 9292
Calmar Ratio Rank
EIPI Martin Ratio Rank: 8686
Martin Ratio Rank

SPIN
SPIN Risk / Return Rank: 4545
Overall Rank
SPIN Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4747
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SPIN Sortino Ratio Rank: 4545
Sortino Ratio Rank
SPIN Omega Ratio Rank: 4848
Omega Ratio Rank
SPIN Calmar Ratio Rank: 3737
Calmar Ratio Rank
SPIN Martin Ratio Rank: 4646
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

EIPI vs. SPIN - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for FT Energy Income Partners Enhanced Income ETF (EIPI) and State Street US Equity Premium Income ETF (SPIN). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


EIPISPINDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.97

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+1.58

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.39

1.24

+0.14

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

4.81

1.51

+3.30

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

14.07

6.08

+7.99

EIPI vs. SPIN - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current EIPI Sharpe Ratio is 2.28, which is higher than the SPIN Sharpe Ratio of 1.31. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of EIPI and SPIN, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

EIPI vs. SPIN - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum EIPI drawdown since its inception was -12.33%, smaller than the maximum SPIN drawdown of -16.85%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for EIPI and SPIN.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


EIPISPINDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-12.33%

-16.85%

+4.52%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-4.77%

-9.81%

+5.04%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.77%

-0.69%

-0.08%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-1.72%

-2.24%

+0.52%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.63%

2.42%

-0.79%

Volatility

EIPI vs. SPIN - Volatility Comparison

FT Energy Income Partners Enhanced Income ETF (EIPI) has a higher volatility of 4.19% compared to State Street US Equity Premium Income ETF (SPIN) at 3.48%. This indicates that EIPI's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than SPIN based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


EIPISPINDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

4.19%

3.48%

+0.71%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

7.84%

8.79%

-0.95%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

10.06%

11.26%

-1.20%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

13.08%

14.28%

-1.20%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

13.08%

14.28%

-1.20%

EIPI vs. SPIN - Expense Ratio Comparison

EIPI has a 1.11% expense ratio, which is higher than SPIN's 0.25% expense ratio.


Dividends

EIPI vs. SPIN - Dividend Comparison

EIPI's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 6.69%, more than SPIN's 5.15% yield.


Frequently Asked Questions


EIPI and SPIN have a correlation of 0.02, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

EIPI has higher volatility (4.19%) compared to SPIN (3.48%). In terms of maximum drawdown, EIPI dropped -12.33% vs SPIN's -16.85%.

On 1-year performance, EIPI leads with 22.83% vs 14.70% for SPIN. On fees, SPIN is cheaper at 0.25% per year. On volatility, SPIN has been the lower-risk option at 3.48%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 1-year period, EIPI has performed better with a 22.83% return vs 14.70%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

SPIN is cheaper with a 0.25% expense ratio, compared with 1.11% for EIPI.

EIPI has the higher dividend yield at 6.69%, compared with 5.15% for SPIN.

They also come from different issuers: First Trust and State Street. Their fees differ too: 1.11% for EIPI and 0.25% for SPIN.

EIPI currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.28 vs 1.31), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for EIPI and SPIN

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer