EINC vs. TNGY
EINC (VanEck Energy Income ETF) and TNGY (Tortoise Energy Fund) are both Energy Equities funds. EINC is passively managed, while TNGY is actively managed. A 0.74 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. EINC charges 0.45%/yr vs 0.85%/yr for TNGY.
Performance
EINC vs. TNGY - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, EINC achieves a 24.74% return, which is significantly higher than TNGY's 15.21% return.
EINC
- 1D
- -0.39%
- 1M
- -1.60%
- YTD
- 24.74%
- 6M
- 24.40%
- 1Y
- 26.00%
- 3Y*
- 29.18%
- 5Y*
- 20.73%
- 10Y*
- 11.62%
TNGY
- 1D
- 0.39%
- 1M
- -3.15%
- YTD
- 15.21%
- 6M
- 12.60%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
EINC vs. TNGY - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
EINC VanEck Energy Income ETF | 24.74% | 2.26% |
TNGY Tortoise Energy Fund | 15.21% | 1.81% |
Correlation
The correlation between EINC and TNGY is 0.74, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 17, 2025 | 0.74 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
EINC vs. TNGY — Risk / Return Rank
EINC
TNGY
EINC vs. TNGY - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for VanEck Energy Income ETF (EINC) and Tortoise Energy Fund (TNGY). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| EINC | TNGY | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.31 | — | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 3.31 | — | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 9.18 | — | — |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| EINC | TNGY | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.78 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 1.07 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.46 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.04 | 1.15 | -1.12 |
Drawdowns
EINC vs. TNGY - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum EINC drawdown since its inception was -87.55%, which is greater than TNGY's maximum drawdown of -8.86%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for EINC and TNGY.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| EINC | TNGY | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -87.55% | -8.86% | -78.69% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -7.89% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -16.01% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -19.87% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -68.85% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -5.44% | -3.92% | -1.52% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -44.29% | -2.18% | -42.11% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.85% | — | — |
Volatility
EINC vs. TNGY - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| EINC | TNGY | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 6.39% | — | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 11.57% | — | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 14.72% | 15.70% | -0.98% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 19.58% | 15.70% | +3.88% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 25.43% | 15.70% | +9.73% |
EINC vs. TNGY - Expense Ratio Comparison
EINC has a 0.45% expense ratio, which is lower than TNGY's 0.85% expense ratio.
Dividends
EINC vs. TNGY - Dividend Comparison
EINC's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.55%, more than TNGY's 3.41% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
EINC VanEck Energy Income ETF | 3.55% | 4.51% | 3.33% | 3.77% | 2.89% | 6.03% | 6.69% | 9.66% | 11.31% | 8.53% | 9.71% | 28.53% |
TNGY Tortoise Energy Fund | 3.41% | 2.59% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
EINC and TNGY have a correlation of 0.74, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, EINC is cheaper at 0.45% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
EINC is cheaper with a 0.45% expense ratio, compared with 0.85% for TNGY.
EINC has the higher dividend yield at 3.55%, compared with 3.41% for TNGY.
They also come from different issuers: VanEck and Tortoise Capital. Their fees differ too: 0.45% for EINC and 0.85% for TNGY.
Find the right allocation for EINC and TNGY
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer