EINC vs. BKUI
EINC (VanEck Energy Income ETF) and BKUI (BNY Mellon Ultra Short Income ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - EINC is a Energy Equities fund tracking the MVIS North America Energy Infrastructure Index, while BKUI is a Ultrashort Bond fund actively managed by BNY Mellon. EINC is passively managed, while BKUI is actively managed. Over the past 3 years, EINC returned 29.18%/yr vs 5.21%/yr for BKUI. At a correlation of -0.01, they often move in opposite directions. EINC charges 0.45%/yr vs 0.12%/yr for BKUI.
Performance
EINC vs. BKUI - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, EINC achieves a 24.74% return, which is significantly higher than BKUI's 1.42% return.
EINC
- 1D
- -0.39%
- 1M
- -1.60%
- YTD
- 24.74%
- 6M
- 24.40%
- 1Y
- 26.00%
- 3Y*
- 29.18%
- 5Y*
- 20.73%
- 10Y*
- 11.62%
BKUI
- 1D
- -0.01%
- 1M
- 0.33%
- YTD
- 1.42%
- 6M
- 1.74%
- 1Y
- 4.32%
- 3Y*
- 5.21%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
EINC vs. BKUI - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
EINC VanEck Energy Income ETF | 24.74% | 7.11% | 42.79% | 15.55% | 19.18% | 2.92% |
BKUI BNY Mellon Ultra Short Income ETF | 1.42% | 4.93% | 5.50% | 5.75% | -0.08% | -0.26% |
Correlation
The correlation between EINC and BKUI is -0.23, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.23 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | -0.03 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 12, 2021 | -0.01 |
Over the past year, the inverse relationship between EINC and BKUI has strengthened: their correlation has moved from -0.01 to -0.23, meaning they now move in opposite directions more often than their long-term average.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
EINC vs. BKUI — Risk / Return Rank
EINC
BKUI
EINC vs. BKUI - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for VanEck Energy Income ETF (EINC) and BNY Mellon Ultra Short Income ETF (BKUI). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| EINC | BKUI | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -8.75 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -22.82 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.31 | 6.02 | -4.71 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 3.31 | 32.56 | -29.25 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 9.18 | 230.94 | -221.77 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| EINC | BKUI | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.78 | 10.52 | -8.75 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 1.07 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.46 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.04 | 6.08 | -6.05 |
Drawdowns
EINC vs. BKUI - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum EINC drawdown since its inception was -87.55%, which is greater than BKUI's maximum drawdown of -1.72%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for EINC and BKUI.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| EINC | BKUI | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -87.55% | -1.72% | -85.83% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -7.89% | -0.13% | -7.76% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -16.01% | -0.25% | -15.76% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -19.87% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -68.85% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -5.44% | -0.01% | -5.43% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -44.29% | -0.27% | -44.02% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.85% | 0.02% | +2.83% |
Volatility
EINC vs. BKUI - Volatility Comparison
VanEck Energy Income ETF (EINC) has a higher volatility of 6.39% compared to BNY Mellon Ultra Short Income ETF (BKUI) at 0.15%. This indicates that EINC's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than BKUI based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| EINC | BKUI | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 6.39% | 0.15% | +6.24% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 11.57% | 0.31% | +11.26% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 14.72% | 0.41% | +14.31% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 19.58% | 0.59% | +18.99% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 25.43% | 0.59% | +24.84% |
EINC vs. BKUI - Expense Ratio Comparison
EINC has a 0.45% expense ratio, which is higher than BKUI's 0.12% expense ratio.
Dividends
EINC vs. BKUI - Dividend Comparison
EINC's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.55%, less than BKUI's 4.21% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
BKUI BNY Mellon Ultra Short Income ETF | 4.21% | 4.48% | 5.11% | 4.29% | 1.82% | 0.22% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
EINC VanEck Energy Income ETF | 3.55% | 4.51% | 3.33% | 3.77% | 2.89% | 6.03% | 6.69% | 9.66% | 11.31% | 8.53% | 9.71% | 28.53% |
Frequently Asked Questions
EINC and BKUI have a correlation of -0.23, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
EINC has higher volatility (6.39%) compared to BKUI (0.15%). In terms of maximum drawdown, EINC dropped -87.55% vs BKUI's -1.72%.
On 3-year performance, EINC leads with 29.18% vs 5.21% for BKUI. On fees, BKUI is cheaper at 0.12% per year. On volatility, BKUI has been the lower-risk option at 0.15%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 3-year period, EINC has performed better with a 29.18% return vs 5.21%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
BKUI is cheaper with a 0.12% expense ratio, compared with 0.45% for EINC.
BKUI has the higher dividend yield at 4.21%, compared with 3.55% for EINC.
EINC is categorized as Energy Equities, while BKUI is Ultrashort Bond. They also come from different issuers: VanEck and BNY Mellon. Their fees differ too: 0.45% for EINC and 0.12% for BKUI.
BKUI currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (10.52 vs 1.78), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for EINC and BKUI
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer