PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo

Documentation

Upgrade your plan
EIMU.L vs. UC79.L
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

EIMU.L vs. UC79.L

Last updated Jun 5, 2026

EIMU.L (iShares Core MSCI EM IMI UCITS ETF USD (Dist)) and UC79.L (UBS ETF (LU) MSCI Emerging Markets Socially Responsible UCITS ETF (USD) A-dis) are both Emerging Markets Equities funds - EIMU.L tracks the MSCI Emerging Markets Investable Market (IMI) Index while UC79.L tracks the MSCI EM NR USD. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, EIMU.L returned 7.61%/yr vs 9.08%/yr for UC79.L. Their correlation of 0.90 suggests significant overlap in exposure. EIMU.L charges 0.18%/yr vs 0.27%/yr for UC79.L.

Performance

EIMU.L vs. UC79.L - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in iShares Core MSCI EM IMI UCITS ETF USD (Dist) (EIMU.L) and UBS ETF (LU) MSCI Emerging Markets Socially Responsible UCITS ETF (USD) A-dis (UC79.L). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Different Trading Currencies

EIMU.L is traded in USD, while UC79.L is traded in GBp. To make them comparable, the UC79.L values have been converted to USD using the latest available exchange rates.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, EIMU.L achieves a 24.39% return, which is significantly lower than UC79.L's 32.92% return.

EIMU.L

1D
-1.28%
1M
4.63%
YTD
24.39%
6M
27.22%
1Y
49.50%
3Y*
23.34%
5Y*
7.61%
10Y*
—

UC79.L

1D
-1.59%
1M
7.70%
YTD
32.92%
6M
36.28%
1Y
63.06%
3Y*
27.56%
5Y*
9.08%
10Y*
9.78%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

EIMU.L vs. UC79.L - Yearly Performance Comparison

2026 (YTD)20252024202320222021202020192018
EIMU.L
iShares Core MSCI EM IMI UCITS ETF USD (Dist)		24.39%31.93%7.46%11.02%-19.67%-0.63%18.78%16.43%-18.45%
UC79.L
UBS ETF (LU) MSCI Emerging Markets Socially Responsible UCITS ETF (USD) A-dis		32.92%36.53%9.03%6.48%-21.18%-0.58%16.74%10.98%-15.04%

Correlation

The correlation between EIMU.L and UC79.L is 0.91, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.

Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.91

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.92

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.91

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 13, 2018

0.90

The correlation between EIMU.L and UC79.L has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.90 to 0.92 - a consistent structural relationship.

EIMU.L vs. UC79.L - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors
EIMU.L
UC79.L

Technology

35.0%
38.0%

Financial Services

18.4%
22.6%

Consumer Cyclical

9.6%
11.0%

Industrials

8.9%
8.3%

Basic Materials

6.9%
3.3%

Communication Services

6.4%
8.0%

Energy

3.9%
0.2%

Healthcare

3.7%
3.6%

Consumer Defensive

3.3%
2.8%

Utilities

2.2%
1.0%

Real Estate

1.7%
1.3%

Technology

EIMU.L
35.0%
UC79.L
38.0%

Financial Services

EIMU.L
18.4%
UC79.L
22.6%

Consumer Cyclical

EIMU.L
9.6%
UC79.L
11.0%

Industrials

EIMU.L
8.9%
UC79.L
8.3%

Basic Materials

EIMU.L
6.9%
UC79.L
3.3%

Communication Services

EIMU.L
6.4%
UC79.L
8.0%

Energy

EIMU.L
3.9%
UC79.L
0.2%

Healthcare

EIMU.L
3.7%
UC79.L
3.6%

Consumer Defensive

EIMU.L
3.3%
UC79.L
2.8%

Utilities

EIMU.L
2.2%
UC79.L
1.0%

Real Estate

EIMU.L
1.7%
UC79.L
1.3%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.

iShares Core MSCI EM IMI UCITS ETF USD (Dist)

UBS ETF (LU) MSCI Emerging Markets Socially Responsible UCITS ETF (USD) A-dis

Often compared with EIMU.L:
EIMU.L vs. EIMI.LEIMU.L vs. EXCS.LEIMU.L vs. XDEX.LEIMU.L vs. ISAC.LEIMU.L vs. DGSE.LEIMU.L vs. HEMC.LEIMU.L vs. EMV.L
Often compared with UC79.L:
UC79.L vs. HMEF.LUC79.L vs. EMV.LUC79.L vs. COPPUC79.L vs. V3AB.LUC79.L vs. HDEM.LUC79.L vs. EUFM.LUC79.L vs. 5ESG.L

Return for Risk

EIMU.L vs. UC79.L — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.
EIMU.L
EIMU.L Risk / Return Rank: 7878
Overall Rank
EIMU.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8080
Sharpe Ratio Rank
EIMU.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 7878
Sortino Ratio Rank
EIMU.L Omega Ratio Rank: 7979
Omega Ratio Rank
EIMU.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 7777
Calmar Ratio Rank
EIMU.L Martin Ratio Rank: 7575
Martin Ratio Rank
UC79.L
UC79.L Risk / Return Rank: 5252
Overall Rank
UC79.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4242
Sharpe Ratio Rank
UC79.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 4747
Sortino Ratio Rank
UC79.L Omega Ratio Rank: 9090
Omega Ratio Rank
UC79.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 5151
Calmar Ratio Rank
UC79.L Martin Ratio Rank: 3131
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

EIMU.L vs. UC79.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares Core MSCI EM IMI UCITS ETF USD (Dist) (EIMU.L) and UBS ETF (LU) MSCI Emerging Markets Socially Responsible UCITS ETF (USD) A-dis (UC79.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

EIMU.LUC79.LDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility
2.56
1.39

+1.18

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk
3.42
2.21

+1.22

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.46

1.51

-0.04

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.82

2.31

+1.50

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

14.03

4.45

+9.58

Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

EIMU.L vs. UC79.L - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current EIMU.L Sharpe Ratio is 2.56, which is higher than the UC79.L Sharpe Ratio of 1.39. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of EIMU.L and UC79.L, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period

EIMU.LUC79.LDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.56

1.39

+1.18

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.42

0.34

+0.08

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

—

0.37

—

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.36

0.08

+0.28

Drawdowns

EIMU.L vs. UC79.L - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum EIMU.L drawdown since its inception was -37.70%, smaller than the maximum UC79.L drawdown of -58.96%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for EIMU.L and UC79.L.

Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators

EIMU.LUC79.LDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-37.70%

-58.96%

+21.26%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-12.90%

-27.11%

+14.21%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-17.24%

-27.11%

+9.87%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-35.46%

-36.83%

+1.37%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

—

-45.20%

—

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-2.51%

-2.76%

+0.25%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-13.86%

-34.81%

+20.95%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.52%

14.13%

-10.61%

Volatility

EIMU.L vs. UC79.L - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for iShares Core MSCI EM IMI UCITS ETF USD (Dist) (EIMU.L) is 8.53%, while UBS ETF (LU) MSCI Emerging Markets Socially Responsible UCITS ETF (USD) A-dis (UC79.L) has a volatility of 9.25%. This indicates that EIMU.L experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than UC79.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Loading charts...

Volatility by Period

EIMU.LUC79.LDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

8.53%

9.25%

-0.72%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

16.64%

17.02%

-0.38%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

19.27%

45.29%

-26.02%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

18.25%

26.67%

-8.42%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

19.89%

26.16%

-6.27%

EIMU.L vs. UC79.L - Expense Ratio Comparison

EIMU.L has a 0.18% expense ratio, which is lower than UC79.L's 0.27% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.

Dividends

EIMU.L vs. UC79.L - Dividend Comparison

EIMU.L's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.61%, more than UC79.L's 1.59% yield.

PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
EIMU.L
iShares Core MSCI EM IMI UCITS ETF USD (Dist)		1.61%1.92%2.34%2.43%3.14%1.90%1.70%2.30%1.80%0.00%0.00%0.00%
UC79.L
UBS ETF (LU) MSCI Emerging Markets Socially Responsible UCITS ETF (USD) A-dis		1.59%2.14%1.79%2.38%2.06%1.35%1.81%2.11%2.11%1.97%2.15%1.60%

Frequently Asked Questions

With a correlation of 0.91, EIMU.L and UC79.L move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

On fees, EIMU.L is cheaper at 0.18% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

EIMU.L is cheaper with a 0.18% expense ratio, compared with 0.27% for UC79.L.

EIMU.L tracks MSCI Emerging Markets Investable Market (IMI) Index, while UC79.L tracks MSCI EM NR USD. They also come from different issuers: iShares and UBS. Their fees differ too: 0.18% for EIMU.L and 0.27% for UC79.L.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for EIMU.L and UC79.L

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer