EIM vs. EADOX
Compare and contrast key facts about Eaton Vance Municipal Bond Fund (EIM) and Eaton Vance Emerging Markets Debt Opportunities Fund Class A (EADOX).
EIM is managed by Eaton Vance. It was launched on Dec 3, 1993. EADOX is managed by Eaton Vance. It was launched on Sep 3, 2015.
Performance
EIM vs. EADOX - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
EIM vs. EADOX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
EIM Eaton Vance Municipal Bond Fund | 1.02% | -0.08% | 8.21% | 1.66% | -19.82% | 4.35% | 10.53% | 18.91% | -5.30% | 6.44% |
EADOX Eaton Vance Emerging Markets Debt Opportunities Fund Class A | 1.47% | 16.93% | 14.52% | 11.13% | -6.42% | 1.24% | 7.12% | 17.85% | -4.44% | 12.58% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, EIM achieves a 1.02% return, which is significantly lower than EADOX's 1.47% return. Over the past 10 years, EIM has underperformed EADOX with an annualized return of 1.77%, while EADOX has yielded a comparatively higher 7.58% annualized return.
EIM
- 1D
- -0.92%
- 1M
- -3.09%
- YTD
- 1.02%
- 6M
- -0.38%
- 1Y
- 2.81%
- 3Y*
- 3.16%
- 5Y*
- -1.29%
- 10Y*
- 1.77%
EADOX
- 1D
- 0.12%
- 1M
- -2.42%
- YTD
- 1.47%
- 6M
- 6.71%
- 1Y
- 14.97%
- 3Y*
- 13.94%
- 5Y*
- 7.71%
- 10Y*
- 7.58%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
EIM vs. EADOX - Expense Ratio Comparison
EIM has a 0.01% expense ratio, which is lower than EADOX's 1.11% expense ratio.
Return for Risk
EIM vs. EADOX — Risk / Return Rank
EIM
EADOX
EIM vs. EADOX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Eaton Vance Municipal Bond Fund (EIM) and Eaton Vance Emerging Markets Debt Opportunities Fund Class A (EADOX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| EIM | EADOX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 0.28 | 4.12 | -3.84 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 0.49 | 5.77 | -5.28 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.06 | 2.06 | -0.99 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 0.49 | 4.06 | -3.57 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 1.04 | 16.37 | -15.33 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| EIM | EADOX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.28 | 4.12 | -3.84 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | -0.12 | 1.71 | -1.83 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.15 | 1.61 | -1.45 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.26 | 1.63 | -1.37 |
Correlation
The correlation between EIM and EADOX is 0.09, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.
Dividends
EIM vs. EADOX - Dividend Comparison
EIM's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 6.30%, less than EADOX's 10.84% yield.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
EIM Eaton Vance Municipal Bond Fund | 6.30% | 6.27% | 5.65% | 4.07% | 4.87% | 4.38% | 4.29% | 4.00% | 4.98% | 5.48% | 5.64% | 5.90% |
EADOX Eaton Vance Emerging Markets Debt Opportunities Fund Class A | 10.84% | 10.51% | 8.27% | 8.73% | 8.87% | 7.56% | 7.42% | 7.57% | 7.83% | 7.61% | 4.04% | 0.00% |
Drawdowns
EIM vs. EADOX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum EIM drawdown since its inception was -52.50%, which is greater than EADOX's maximum drawdown of -19.15%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for EIM and EADOX.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| EIM | EADOX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -52.50% | -19.15% | -33.35% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -6.76% | -3.61% | -3.15% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -31.69% | -17.56% | -14.13% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -31.69% | -19.15% | -12.54% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -11.92% | -3.50% | -8.42% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -8.36% | -2.56% | -5.80% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 3.20% | 0.90% | +2.30% |
Volatility
EIM vs. EADOX - Volatility Comparison
Eaton Vance Municipal Bond Fund (EIM) has a higher volatility of 3.69% compared to Eaton Vance Emerging Markets Debt Opportunities Fund Class A (EADOX) at 1.77%. This indicates that EIM's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than EADOX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| EIM | EADOX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 3.69% | 1.77% | +1.92% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 5.18% | 2.67% | +2.51% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 10.02% | 3.61% | +6.41% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 10.60% | 4.53% | +6.07% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 11.52% | 4.72% | +6.80% |