PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
BSNIX vs. GUIRX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

BSNIX vs. GUIRX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Baird Strategic Municipal Bond Fund Institutional Class (BSNIX) and Goldman Sachs Dynamic Municipal Income Fund Investor Class (GUIRX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, BSNIX achieves a 1.36% return, which is significantly lower than GUIRX's 1.83% return.


BSNIX

1D
0.00%
1M
1.00%
YTD
1.36%
6M
1.59%
1Y
5.57%
3Y*
4.48%
5Y*
2.23%
10Y*

GUIRX

1D
0.13%
1M
1.44%
YTD
1.83%
6M
2.36%
1Y
6.28%
3Y*
4.70%
5Y*
1.32%
10Y*
2.71%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

BSNIX vs. GUIRX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025202420232022202120202019
BSNIX
Baird Strategic Municipal Bond Fund Institutional Class
1.36%4.90%3.17%6.78%-5.31%2.26%8.39%0.88%
GUIRX
Goldman Sachs Dynamic Municipal Income Fund Investor Class
1.83%4.73%3.66%6.37%-9.66%3.11%3.86%1.47%

Correlation

The correlation between BSNIX and GUIRX is 0.78, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.78

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.81

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.83

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 15, 2019

0.79

The correlation between BSNIX and GUIRX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.78 to 0.83 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

BSNIX vs. GUIRX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

BSNIX
BSNIX Risk / Return Rank: 7979
Overall Rank
BSNIX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9898
Sharpe Ratio Rank
BSNIX Sortino Ratio Rank: 9797
Sortino Ratio Rank
BSNIX Omega Ratio Rank: 9797
Omega Ratio Rank
BSNIX Calmar Ratio Rank: 5353
Calmar Ratio Rank
BSNIX Martin Ratio Rank: 4949
Martin Ratio Rank

GUIRX
GUIRX Risk / Return Rank: 7373
Overall Rank
GUIRX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8787
Sharpe Ratio Rank
GUIRX Sortino Ratio Rank: 9393
Sortino Ratio Rank
GUIRX Omega Ratio Rank: 9393
Omega Ratio Rank
GUIRX Calmar Ratio Rank: 5050
Calmar Ratio Rank
GUIRX Martin Ratio Rank: 4545
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

BSNIX vs. GUIRX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Baird Strategic Municipal Bond Fund Institutional Class (BSNIX) and Goldman Sachs Dynamic Municipal Income Fund Investor Class (GUIRX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


BSNIXGUIRXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.81

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.82

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.95

1.68

+0.28

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.67

2.57

+0.10

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

9.71

8.99

+0.73

BSNIX vs. GUIRX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current BSNIX Sharpe Ratio is 3.43, which is higher than the GUIRX Sharpe Ratio of 2.62. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of BSNIX and GUIRX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

BSNIX vs. GUIRX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum BSNIX drawdown since its inception was -9.58%, smaller than the maximum GUIRX drawdown of -14.21%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BSNIX and GUIRX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


BSNIXGUIRXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-9.58%

-14.21%

+4.63%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-2.09%

-2.46%

+0.37%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-3.41%

-5.33%

+1.92%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-9.58%

-14.16%

+4.58%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-14.21%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.35%

-0.09%

-0.26%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-1.49%

-2.12%

+0.63%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

0.57%

0.70%

-0.13%

Volatility

BSNIX vs. GUIRX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Baird Strategic Municipal Bond Fund Institutional Class (BSNIX) is 0.41%, while Goldman Sachs Dynamic Municipal Income Fund Investor Class (GUIRX) has a volatility of 0.66%. This indicates that BSNIX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than GUIRX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


BSNIXGUIRXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

0.41%

0.66%

-0.25%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

1.30%

1.81%

-0.51%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.63%

2.42%

-0.79%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

2.68%

3.70%

-1.02%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

3.35%

3.94%

-0.59%

BSNIX vs. GUIRX - Expense Ratio Comparison

BSNIX has a 0.30% expense ratio, which is lower than GUIRX's 0.47% expense ratio.


Dividends

BSNIX vs. GUIRX - Dividend Comparison

BSNIX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.27%, less than GUIRX's 3.74% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
BSNIX
Baird Strategic Municipal Bond Fund Institutional Class
3.27%3.29%3.51%3.22%2.09%1.58%2.23%0.18%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
GUIRX
Goldman Sachs Dynamic Municipal Income Fund Investor Class
3.74%4.90%3.86%2.78%2.06%2.16%2.38%2.84%3.04%3.23%3.60%3.68%

Frequently Asked Questions


BSNIX and GUIRX have a correlation of 0.78, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

GUIRX has higher volatility (0.66%) compared to BSNIX (0.41%). In terms of maximum drawdown, BSNIX dropped -9.58% vs GUIRX's -14.21%.

BSNIX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (3.43 vs 2.62), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for BSNIX and GUIRX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer