EIISX vs. RWIIX
EIISX (Parametric International Equity Fund) and RWIIX (Redwood AlphaFactor Tactical International Fund) are both Foreign Large Cap Equities funds. Over the past 5 years, EIISX returned 6.98%/yr vs 0.97%/yr for RWIIX. A 0.61 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. EIISX charges 0.50%/yr vs 1.22%/yr for RWIIX.
Performance
EIISX vs. RWIIX - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, EIISX achieves a 4.11% return, which is significantly lower than RWIIX's 4.86% return.
EIISX
- 1D
- -1.04%
- 1M
- -2.41%
- YTD
- 4.11%
- 6M
- 3.91%
- 1Y
- 11.84%
- 3Y*
- 15.80%
- 5Y*
- 6.98%
- 10Y*
- 9.20%
RWIIX
- 1D
- -2.44%
- 1M
- -2.93%
- YTD
- 4.86%
- 6M
- 5.02%
- 1Y
- 15.67%
- 3Y*
- 3.92%
- 5Y*
- 0.97%
- 10Y*
- —
EIISX vs. RWIIX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
EIISX Parametric International Equity Fund | 4.11% | 28.86% | 7.31% | 15.85% | -15.68% | 8.76% | 9.96% | 22.12% | -11.62% | 0.70% |
RWIIX Redwood AlphaFactor Tactical International Fund | 4.86% | 7.87% | -6.03% | 9.07% | -11.57% | 10.68% | 14.57% | 4.58% | -2.46% | 0.62% |
Correlation
The correlation between EIISX and RWIIX is 0.79, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.79 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.74 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.66 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 26, 2017 | 0.61 |
The correlation between EIISX and RWIIX shifts across timeframes, from 0.61 (all time) to 0.79 (1 year), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
EIISX vs. RWIIX — Risk / Return Rank
EIISX
RWIIX
EIISX vs. RWIIX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Parametric International Equity Fund (EIISX) and Redwood AlphaFactor Tactical International Fund (RWIIX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| EIISX | RWIIX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.37 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.42 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.20 | 1.28 | -0.08 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.44 | 2.51 | -1.06 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 5.12 | 6.50 | -1.39 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
EIISX vs. RWIIX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum EIISX drawdown since its inception was -33.36%, which is greater than RWIIX's maximum drawdown of -20.34%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for EIISX and RWIIX.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| EIISX | RWIIX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -33.36% | -20.34% | -13.02% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -8.90% | -6.94% | -1.96% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -11.58% | -20.34% | +8.76% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -31.33% | -20.34% | -10.99% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -33.36% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -3.86% | -4.76% | +0.90% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -6.62% | -7.78% | +1.16% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.51% | 2.67% | -0.16% |
Volatility
EIISX vs. RWIIX - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Parametric International Equity Fund (EIISX) is 3.22%, while Redwood AlphaFactor Tactical International Fund (RWIIX) has a volatility of 4.78%. This indicates that EIISX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than RWIIX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| EIISX | RWIIX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 3.22% | 4.78% | -1.56% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 9.28% | 9.42% | -0.14% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 11.57% | 11.77% | -0.20% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 14.55% | 11.68% | +2.87% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 15.15% | 10.98% | +4.17% |
EIISX vs. RWIIX - Expense Ratio Comparison
EIISX has a 0.50% expense ratio, which is lower than RWIIX's 1.22% expense ratio.
Dividends
EIISX vs. RWIIX - Dividend Comparison
EIISX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 12.93%, more than RWIIX's 8.33% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
EIISX Parametric International Equity Fund | 12.93% | 13.46% | 10.34% | 3.29% | 4.37% | 4.77% | 1.55% | 3.10% | 3.18% | 2.80% | 1.81% | 2.59% |
RWIIX Redwood AlphaFactor Tactical International Fund | 8.33% | 8.74% | 0.00% | 6.82% | 1.72% | 14.15% | 6.51% | 1.84% | 0.86% | 0.02% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
EIISX and RWIIX have a correlation of 0.79, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
RWIIX has higher volatility (4.78%) compared to EIISX (3.22%). In terms of maximum drawdown, EIISX dropped -33.36% vs RWIIX's -20.34%.
RWIIX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.48 vs 1.11), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for EIISX and RWIIX
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer