PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
EIGIX vs. TGRNX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

EIGIX vs. TGRNX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Eaton Vance Core Bond Fund (EIGIX) and TIAA-CREF Green Bond Fund (TGRNX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, EIGIX achieves a -0.10% return, which is significantly lower than TGRNX's 0.46% return.


EIGIX

1D
-0.35%
1M
0.71%
YTD
-0.10%
6M
0.37%
1Y
4.05%
3Y*
4.58%
5Y*
0.36%
10Y*
2.15%

TGRNX

1D
-0.22%
1M
0.58%
YTD
0.46%
6M
0.81%
1Y
4.47%
3Y*
4.73%
5Y*
0.29%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

EIGIX vs. TGRNX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024202320222021202020192018
EIGIX
Eaton Vance Core Bond Fund
-0.10%7.76%2.90%5.03%-13.13%0.72%8.18%9.84%1.30%
TGRNX
TIAA-CREF Green Bond Fund
0.46%6.76%3.08%5.73%-13.43%-0.60%8.57%9.15%1.43%

Correlation

The correlation between EIGIX and TGRNX is 0.93, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.93

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.96

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.96

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 16, 2018

0.94

The correlation between EIGIX and TGRNX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.93 to 0.96 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

EIGIX vs. TGRNX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

EIGIX
EIGIX Risk / Return Rank: 1616
Overall Rank
EIGIX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1717
Sharpe Ratio Rank
EIGIX Sortino Ratio Rank: 1717
Sortino Ratio Rank
EIGIX Omega Ratio Rank: 1616
Omega Ratio Rank
EIGIX Calmar Ratio Rank: 1717
Calmar Ratio Rank
EIGIX Martin Ratio Rank: 1616
Martin Ratio Rank

TGRNX
TGRNX Risk / Return Rank: 3232
Overall Rank
TGRNX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3232
Sharpe Ratio Rank
TGRNX Sortino Ratio Rank: 3737
Sortino Ratio Rank
TGRNX Omega Ratio Rank: 3333
Omega Ratio Rank
TGRNX Calmar Ratio Rank: 3030
Calmar Ratio Rank
TGRNX Martin Ratio Rank: 2828
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

EIGIX vs. TGRNX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Eaton Vance Core Bond Fund (EIGIX) and TIAA-CREF Green Bond Fund (TGRNX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


EIGIXTGRNXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.44

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.77

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.19

1.28

-0.09

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.36

1.92

-0.56

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

3.95

6.05

-2.10

EIGIX vs. TGRNX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current EIGIX Sharpe Ratio is 1.07, which is comparable to the TGRNX Sharpe Ratio of 1.51. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of EIGIX and TGRNX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

EIGIX vs. TGRNX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum EIGIX drawdown since its inception was -17.71%, roughly equal to the maximum TGRNX drawdown of -17.85%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for EIGIX and TGRNX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


EIGIXTGRNXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-17.71%

-17.85%

+0.14%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-3.18%

-2.47%

-0.71%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-6.22%

-3.99%

-2.23%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-17.71%

-17.85%

+0.14%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-17.71%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-1.80%

-0.99%

-0.81%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-3.27%

-5.19%

+1.92%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.09%

0.78%

+0.31%

Volatility

EIGIX vs. TGRNX - Volatility Comparison

Eaton Vance Core Bond Fund (EIGIX) has a higher volatility of 1.20% compared to TIAA-CREF Green Bond Fund (TGRNX) at 0.97%. This indicates that EIGIX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than TGRNX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


EIGIXTGRNXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

1.20%

0.97%

+0.23%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

3.02%

2.36%

+0.66%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

4.04%

3.14%

+0.90%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

5.58%

4.85%

+0.73%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

4.73%

4.81%

-0.08%

EIGIX vs. TGRNX - Expense Ratio Comparison

EIGIX has a 0.49% expense ratio, which is higher than TGRNX's 0.45% expense ratio.


Dividends

EIGIX vs. TGRNX - Dividend Comparison

EIGIX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.25%, less than TGRNX's 4.30% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
EIGIX
Eaton Vance Core Bond Fund
4.25%4.16%4.29%2.85%3.10%3.53%5.38%4.00%3.25%2.83%2.76%2.96%
TGRNX
TIAA-CREF Green Bond Fund
4.30%4.31%4.48%3.30%2.69%2.76%4.20%4.38%0.43%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


With a correlation of 0.93, EIGIX and TGRNX move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

EIGIX has higher volatility (1.20%) compared to TGRNX (0.97%). In terms of maximum drawdown, EIGIX dropped -17.71% vs TGRNX's -17.85%.

TGRNX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.51 vs 1.07), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for EIGIX and TGRNX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer