PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
EIGIX vs. FTHRX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

EIGIX vs. FTHRX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Eaton Vance Core Bond Fund (EIGIX) and Fidelity Intermediate Bond Fund (FTHRX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, EIGIX achieves a -0.79% return, which is significantly lower than FTHRX's -0.23% return. Both investments have delivered pretty close results over the past 10 years, with EIGIX having a 1.93% annualized return and FTHRX not far behind at 1.87%.


EIGIX

1D
0.12%
1M
-1.17%
6M
-1.02%
YTD
-0.79%
1Y
1.65%
3Y*
4.29%
5Y*
-0.07%
10Y*
1.93%
ALL TIME*
2.18%

FTHRX

1D
0.10%
1M
-0.59%
6M
-0.34%
YTD
-0.23%
1Y
1.82%
3Y*
4.38%
5Y*
0.81%
10Y*
1.87%
ALL TIME*
3.83%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison


PositionAvg. Volume Value (2W)Avg. Volume Value (1M)Avg. Volume Value (3M)
$0.00$0.00$0.00
$0.00$0.00$0.00

EIGIX vs. FTHRX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
EIGIX
Eaton Vance Core Bond Fund
-0.79%7.76%2.90%5.03%-13.13%0.72%8.18%9.84%-0.50%4.47%
FTHRX
Fidelity Intermediate Bond Fund
-0.23%6.89%3.25%5.55%-9.17%-1.60%7.06%7.20%0.52%2.31%

Correlation

The correlation between EIGIX and FTHRX is 0.91, meaning they have usually moved in the same direction, including during past declines.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.

0.91

Correlation (3Y)
Balances recent behavior with more history.

0.93

Correlation (5Y)
Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period.

0.93

Correlation (10Y)
Provides a long-term view across more market conditions.

0.91

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 3, 2012

0.90

The correlation between EIGIX and FTHRX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.90 to 0.93 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

EIGIX vs. FTHRX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

EIGIX
EIGIX Risk / Return Rank: 1717
Overall Rank
EIGIX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1818
Sharpe Ratio Rank
EIGIX Sortino Ratio Rank: 1717
Sortino Ratio Rank
EIGIX Omega Ratio Rank: 1717
Omega Ratio Rank
EIGIX Calmar Ratio Rank: 1717
Calmar Ratio Rank
EIGIX Martin Ratio Rank: 1515
Martin Ratio Rank

FTHRX
FTHRX Risk / Return Rank: 3232
Overall Rank
FTHRX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3434
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FTHRX Sortino Ratio Rank: 3535
Sortino Ratio Rank
FTHRX Omega Ratio Rank: 3333
Omega Ratio Rank
FTHRX Calmar Ratio Rank: 3232
Calmar Ratio Rank
FTHRX Martin Ratio Rank: 2424
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

EIGIX vs. FTHRX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Eaton Vance Core Bond Fund (EIGIX) and Fidelity Intermediate Bond Fund (FTHRX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


EIGIXFTHRXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.31

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.50

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.13

1.19

-0.06

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

0.90

1.35

-0.45

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

2.31

3.34

-1.03

EIGIX vs. FTHRX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current EIGIX Sharpe Ratio is 0.72, which is lower than the FTHRX Sharpe Ratio of 1.04. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of EIGIX and FTHRX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

EIGIX vs. FTHRX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum EIGIX drawdown since its inception was -17.71%, smaller than the maximum FTHRX drawdown of -19.01%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for EIGIX and FTHRX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


EIGIXFTHRXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-17.71%

-19.01%

+1.30%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-3.18%

-2.11%

-1.07%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-5.29%

-2.50%

-2.79%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-17.71%

-13.18%

-4.53%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-17.71%

-13.25%

-4.46%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-2.48%

-1.46%

-1.02%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-3.26%

-3.06%

-0.20%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.24%

0.85%

+0.39%

Volatility

EIGIX vs. FTHRX - Volatility Comparison

Eaton Vance Core Bond Fund (EIGIX) has a higher volatility of 0.96% compared to Fidelity Intermediate Bond Fund (FTHRX) at 0.73%. This indicates that EIGIX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than FTHRX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


EIGIXFTHRXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

0.96%

0.73%

+0.23%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

3.13%

2.18%

+0.95%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

3.95%

2.74%

+1.21%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

5.59%

4.04%

+1.55%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

4.73%

3.40%

+1.33%

EIGIX vs. FTHRX - Expense Ratio Comparison

EIGIX has a 0.49% expense ratio, which is higher than FTHRX's 0.45% expense ratio.


Dividends

EIGIX vs. FTHRX - Dividend Comparison

EIGIX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.95%, more than FTHRX's 3.41% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
EIGIX
Eaton Vance Core Bond Fund
3.95%4.16%4.29%2.85%3.10%3.53%5.38%4.00%3.25%2.83%2.76%2.96%
FTHRX
Fidelity Intermediate Bond Fund
3.41%3.59%3.49%2.94%1.55%1.53%4.16%2.49%2.48%2.20%2.63%2.13%

Frequently Asked Questions


With a correlation of 0.91, EIGIX and FTHRX move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

EIGIX has higher volatility (0.96%) compared to FTHRX (0.73%). In terms of maximum drawdown, EIGIX dropped -17.71% vs FTHRX's -19.01%.

FTHRX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.04 vs 0.72), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for EIGIX and FTHRX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer