EIFVX vs. NQCRX

Last updated Jun 5, 2026

EIFVX (Eaton Vance Focused Value Opportunities Fund) and NQCRX (Nuveen Large Cap Value Fund) are both Large Cap Value Equities funds. Over the past 10 years, EIFVX returned 12.16%/yr vs 14.03%/yr for NQCRX. Their correlation of 0.92 suggests significant overlap in exposure. Both charge a 0.74% expense ratio.

Performance

EIFVX vs. NQCRX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Eaton Vance Focused Value Opportunities Fund (EIFVX) and Nuveen Large Cap Value Fund (NQCRX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, EIFVX achieves a 14.07% return, which is significantly lower than NQCRX's 15.56% return. Over the past 10 years, EIFVX has underperformed NQCRX with an annualized return of 12.16%, while NQCRX has yielded a comparatively higher 14.03% annualized return.

EIFVX

• 1D: 0.30%
• 1M: 2.95%
• YTD: 14.07%
• 6M: 15.07%
• 1Y: 27.58%
• 3Y*: 15.81%
• 5Y*: 9.14%
• 10Y*: 12.16%

NQCRX

• 1D: -0.46%
• 1M: 0.47%
• YTD: 15.56%
• 6M: 16.92%
• 1Y: 37.02%
• 3Y*: 22.34%
• 5Y*: 13.73%
• 10Y*: 14.03%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

EIFVX vs. NQCRX - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
EIFVX Eaton Vance Focused Value Opportunities Fund	14.07%	10.89%	12.44%	8.48%	-3.31%	23.71%	2.23%	37.25%	-6.15%	20.40%
NQCRX Nuveen Large Cap Value Fund	15.56%	22.44%	17.74%	13.76%	-1.07%	25.38%	-0.27%	47.63%	-15.47%	15.46%

Correlation

The correlation between EIFVX and NQCRX is 0.87, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.87
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.88
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.92
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.91
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 6, 2012	0.92

The correlation between EIFVX and NQCRX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.87 to 0.92 - a consistent structural relationship.

Return for Risk

EIFVX vs. NQCRX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

EIFVX

EIFVX Risk / Return Rank: 59
EIFVX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 64
EIFVX Sortino Ratio Rank: 65
EIFVX Omega Ratio Rank: 58
EIFVX Calmar Ratio Rank: 52
EIFVX Martin Ratio Rank: 57

NQCRX

NQCRX Risk / Return Rank: 89
NQCRX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 90
NQCRX Sortino Ratio Rank: 85
NQCRX Omega Ratio Rank: 79
NQCRX Calmar Ratio Rank: 96
NQCRX Martin Ratio Rank: 95

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

EIFVX vs. NQCRX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Eaton Vance Focused Value Opportunities Fund (EIFVX) and Nuveen Large Cap Value Fund (NQCRX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	EIFVX	NQCRX	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	2.33	2.96	-0.63
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	3.33	4.09	-0.76
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.42	1.52	-0.10
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	2.73	6.03	-3.29
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	11.24	22.46	-11.22
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

EIFVX vs. NQCRX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current EIFVX Sharpe Ratio is 2.33, which is comparable to the NQCRX Sharpe Ratio of 2.96. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of EIFVX and NQCRX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	EIFVX	NQCRX	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	2.33	2.96	-0.63
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.59	0.88	-0.30
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.68	0.74	-0.07
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.72	0.39	+0.33

Drawdowns

EIFVX vs. NQCRX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum EIFVX drawdown since its inception was -40.64%, smaller than the maximum NQCRX drawdown of -57.85%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for EIFVX and NQCRX.

Drawdown Indicators

	EIFVX	NQCRX	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-40.64%	-57.85%	+17.21%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-9.93%	-6.07%	-3.86%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-17.87%	-17.21%	-0.66%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-17.87%	-17.61%	-0.26%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-40.64%	-41.84%	+1.20%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-0.50%	-1.22%	+0.72%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-3.85%	-10.01%	+6.16%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	2.41%	1.62%	+0.79%

Volatility

EIFVX vs. NQCRX - Volatility Comparison

Eaton Vance Focused Value Opportunities Fund (EIFVX) and Nuveen Large Cap Value Fund (NQCRX) have volatilities of 3.73% and 3.78%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	EIFVX	NQCRX	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	3.73%	3.78%	-0.05%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	8.64%	9.51%	-0.87%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	11.66%	12.38%	-0.72%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	15.70%	15.60%	+0.10%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	18.04%	18.93%	-0.89%

EIFVX vs. NQCRX - Expense Ratio Comparison

Both EIFVX and NQCRX have an expense ratio of 0.74%.

Dividends

EIFVX vs. NQCRX - Dividend Comparison

EIFVX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.89%, less than NQCRX's 6.32% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
EIFVX Eaton Vance Focused Value Opportunities Fund	4.89%	5.58%	6.99%	2.92%	4.13%	9.92%	3.05%	7.05%	17.26%	3.57%	2.86%	4.17%
NQCRX Nuveen Large Cap Value Fund	6.32%	7.30%	6.82%	2.22%	4.63%	20.85%	17.95%	26.88%	34.12%	27.42%	10.74%	61.01%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both EIFVX and NQCRX in my portfolio?

EIFVX and NQCRX have a correlation of 0.87, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, EIFVX or NQCRX?

NQCRX has higher volatility (3.78%) compared to EIFVX (3.73%). In terms of maximum drawdown, EIFVX dropped -40.64% vs NQCRX's -57.85%.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

NQCRX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.96 vs 2.33), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.