PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
EIFVX vs. EELDX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

EIFVX vs. EELDX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Eaton Vance Focused Value Opportunities Fund (EIFVX) and Eaton Vance Emerging Markets Debt Opportunities Fund (EELDX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, EIFVX achieves a 13.73% return, which is significantly higher than EELDX's 6.66% return. Over the past 10 years, EIFVX has outperformed EELDX with an annualized return of 12.13%, while EELDX has yielded a comparatively lower 7.99% annualized return.


EIFVX

1D
0.81%
1M
4.36%
YTD
13.73%
6M
14.31%
1Y
26.63%
3Y*
15.69%
5Y*
9.19%
10Y*
12.13%

EELDX

1D
0.12%
1M
1.02%
YTD
6.66%
6M
8.15%
1Y
19.13%
3Y*
15.14%
5Y*
8.09%
10Y*
7.99%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

EIFVX vs. EELDX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
EIFVX
Eaton Vance Focused Value Opportunities Fund
13.73%10.89%12.44%8.48%-3.31%23.71%2.23%37.25%-6.15%20.40%
EELDX
Eaton Vance Emerging Markets Debt Opportunities Fund
6.66%15.80%14.87%11.46%-6.14%1.55%7.44%18.34%-4.27%13.05%

Correlation

The correlation between EIFVX and EELDX is 0.32, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.32

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.27

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.31

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.34

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 3, 2014

0.36

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

EIFVX vs. EELDX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

EIFVX
EIFVX Risk / Return Rank: 5959
Overall Rank
EIFVX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6464
Sharpe Ratio Rank
EIFVX Sortino Ratio Rank: 6464
Sortino Ratio Rank
EIFVX Omega Ratio Rank: 5757
Omega Ratio Rank
EIFVX Calmar Ratio Rank: 5252
Calmar Ratio Rank
EIFVX Martin Ratio Rank: 5656
Martin Ratio Rank

EELDX
EELDX Risk / Return Rank: 9797
Overall Rank
EELDX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 100100
Sharpe Ratio Rank
EELDX Sortino Ratio Rank: 9999
Sortino Ratio Rank
EELDX Omega Ratio Rank: 9898
Omega Ratio Rank
EELDX Calmar Ratio Rank: 9393
Calmar Ratio Rank
EELDX Martin Ratio Rank: 9494
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

EIFVX vs. EELDX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Eaton Vance Focused Value Opportunities Fund (EIFVX) and Eaton Vance Emerging Markets Debt Opportunities Fund (EELDX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


EIFVXEELDXDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

2.36

5.55

-3.19

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

3.36

8.56

-5.20

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.42

2.49

-1.07

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

2.77

5.22

-2.46

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

11.38

21.28

-9.90

EIFVX vs. EELDX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current EIFVX Sharpe Ratio is 2.36, which is lower than the EELDX Sharpe Ratio of 5.55. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of EIFVX and EELDX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


EIFVXEELDXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.36

5.55

-3.19

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.59

1.76

-1.17

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.67

1.69

-1.02

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.72

1.39

-0.67

Drawdowns

EIFVX vs. EELDX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum EIFVX drawdown since its inception was -40.64%, which is greater than EELDX's maximum drawdown of -19.12%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for EIFVX and EELDX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


EIFVXEELDXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-40.64%

-19.12%

-21.52%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-9.93%

-3.68%

-6.25%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-17.87%

-3.98%

-13.89%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-17.87%

-17.35%

-0.52%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-40.64%

-19.12%

-21.52%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.80%

0.00%

-0.80%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-3.85%

-2.91%

-0.94%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.41%

0.90%

+1.51%

Volatility

EIFVX vs. EELDX - Volatility Comparison

Eaton Vance Focused Value Opportunities Fund (EIFVX) has a higher volatility of 3.78% compared to Eaton Vance Emerging Markets Debt Opportunities Fund (EELDX) at 0.63%. This indicates that EIFVX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than EELDX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


EIFVXEELDXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.78%

0.63%

+3.15%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

8.66%

3.04%

+5.62%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

11.65%

3.47%

+8.18%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

15.70%

4.61%

+11.09%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

18.04%

4.74%

+13.30%

EIFVX vs. EELDX - Expense Ratio Comparison

EIFVX has a 0.74% expense ratio, which is lower than EELDX's 0.78% expense ratio.


Dividends

EIFVX vs. EELDX - Dividend Comparison

EIFVX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.91%, less than EELDX's 10.78% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
EELDX
Eaton Vance Emerging Markets Debt Opportunities Fund
10.78%9.44%8.58%9.02%9.17%7.87%7.71%7.86%8.16%7.90%4.12%1.65%
EIFVX
Eaton Vance Focused Value Opportunities Fund
4.91%5.58%6.99%2.92%4.13%9.92%3.05%7.05%17.26%3.57%2.86%4.17%

Frequently Asked Questions


EIFVX and EELDX have a correlation of 0.32, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

EIFVX has higher volatility (3.78%) compared to EELDX (0.63%). In terms of maximum drawdown, EIFVX dropped -40.64% vs EELDX's -19.12%.

EELDX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (5.55 vs 2.36), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for EIFVX and EELDX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer