PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
EIFAX vs. KHYAX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

EIFAX vs. KHYAX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Eaton Vance Floating-Rate Advantage Fund (EIFAX) and DWS High Income Fund (KHYAX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, EIFAX achieves a 0.69% return, which is significantly lower than KHYAX's 1.45% return. Both investments have delivered pretty close results over the past 10 years, with EIFAX having a 5.05% annualized return and KHYAX not far ahead at 5.26%.


EIFAX

1D
0.00%
1M
0.59%
YTD
0.69%
6M
0.86%
1Y
3.71%
3Y*
7.26%
5Y*
4.94%
10Y*
5.05%

KHYAX

1D
0.00%
1M
0.53%
YTD
1.45%
6M
2.32%
1Y
7.60%
3Y*
7.79%
5Y*
3.82%
10Y*
5.26%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

EIFAX vs. KHYAX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
EIFAX
Eaton Vance Floating-Rate Advantage Fund
0.69%4.54%8.91%11.86%-2.98%5.41%1.90%9.02%0.28%5.16%
KHYAX
DWS High Income Fund
1.45%7.54%7.02%11.44%-9.15%3.94%5.95%14.65%-2.46%7.18%

Correlation

The correlation between EIFAX and KHYAX is 0.36, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.36

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.38

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.44

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.41

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 18, 2008

0.45

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

EIFAX vs. KHYAX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

EIFAX
EIFAX Risk / Return Rank: 3636
Overall Rank
EIFAX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2626
Sharpe Ratio Rank
EIFAX Sortino Ratio Rank: 5454
Sortino Ratio Rank
EIFAX Omega Ratio Rank: 6262
Omega Ratio Rank
EIFAX Calmar Ratio Rank: 2020
Calmar Ratio Rank
EIFAX Martin Ratio Rank: 1818
Martin Ratio Rank

KHYAX
KHYAX Risk / Return Rank: 8080
Overall Rank
KHYAX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8383
Sharpe Ratio Rank
KHYAX Sortino Ratio Rank: 8787
Sortino Ratio Rank
KHYAX Omega Ratio Rank: 9191
Omega Ratio Rank
KHYAX Calmar Ratio Rank: 5858
Calmar Ratio Rank
KHYAX Martin Ratio Rank: 8080
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

EIFAX vs. KHYAX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Eaton Vance Floating-Rate Advantage Fund (EIFAX) and DWS High Income Fund (KHYAX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


EIFAXKHYAXDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

1.45

2.68

-1.23

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

3.09

4.17

-1.08

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.44

1.67

-0.23

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

1.63

2.93

-1.30

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

4.92

15.00

-10.08

EIFAX vs. KHYAX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current EIFAX Sharpe Ratio is 1.45, which is lower than the KHYAX Sharpe Ratio of 2.68. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of EIFAX and KHYAX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


EIFAXKHYAXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.45

2.68

-1.23

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

1.58

0.78

+0.80

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

1.14

0.90

+0.24

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

1.20

1.04

+0.16

Drawdowns

EIFAX vs. KHYAX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum EIFAX drawdown since its inception was -40.28%, which is greater than KHYAX's maximum drawdown of -31.54%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for EIFAX and KHYAX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


EIFAXKHYAXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-40.28%

-31.54%

-8.74%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-2.29%

-2.68%

+0.39%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-3.43%

-4.49%

+1.06%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-7.63%

-13.22%

+5.59%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-24.22%

-22.42%

-1.80%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

0.00%

0.00%

0.00%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-2.27%

-4.41%

+2.14%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

0.76%

0.52%

+0.24%

Volatility

EIFAX vs. KHYAX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Eaton Vance Floating-Rate Advantage Fund (EIFAX) is 0.64%, while DWS High Income Fund (KHYAX) has a volatility of 0.88%. This indicates that EIFAX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than KHYAX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


EIFAXKHYAXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

0.64%

0.88%

-0.24%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

1.96%

2.27%

-0.31%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.57%

2.86%

-0.29%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

3.14%

4.92%

-1.78%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

4.46%

5.88%

-1.42%

EIFAX vs. KHYAX - Expense Ratio Comparison

EIFAX has a 0.47% expense ratio, which is lower than KHYAX's 0.94% expense ratio.


Dividends

EIFAX vs. KHYAX - Dividend Comparison

EIFAX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 7.61%, more than KHYAX's 5.99% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
EIFAX
Eaton Vance Floating-Rate Advantage Fund
7.61%8.09%8.91%7.02%5.92%4.03%4.51%5.58%5.10%4.46%5.02%5.29%
KHYAX
DWS High Income Fund
5.99%5.41%6.08%5.70%5.33%4.50%4.47%4.86%5.67%5.24%5.03%5.84%

Frequently Asked Questions


EIFAX and KHYAX have a correlation of 0.36, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

KHYAX has higher volatility (0.88%) compared to EIFAX (0.64%). In terms of maximum drawdown, EIFAX dropped -40.28% vs KHYAX's -31.54%.

KHYAX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.68 vs 1.45), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for EIFAX and KHYAX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer