EIFAX vs. FFRAX
Compare and contrast key facts about Eaton Vance Floating-Rate Advantage Fund (EIFAX) and Fidelity Advisor Floating Rate High Income Fund Class A (FFRAX).
EIFAX is managed by Eaton Vance. It was launched on Mar 16, 2008. FFRAX is managed by Fidelity. It was launched on Aug 16, 2000.
Performance
EIFAX vs. FFRAX - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
EIFAX vs. FFRAX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
EIFAX Eaton Vance Floating-Rate Advantage Fund | -1.88% | 4.54% | 8.91% | 11.86% | -2.98% | 5.41% | 1.90% | 9.02% | 0.28% | 5.16% |
FFRAX Fidelity Advisor Floating Rate High Income Fund Class A | -0.66% | 5.28% | 6.83% | 11.35% | -1.77% | 4.83% | 1.38% | 8.19% | -0.09% | 3.52% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, EIFAX achieves a -1.88% return, which is significantly lower than FFRAX's -0.66% return. Over the past 10 years, EIFAX has outperformed FFRAX with an annualized return of 5.15%, while FFRAX has yielded a comparatively lower 4.62% annualized return.
EIFAX
- 1D
- 0.11%
- 1M
- -0.32%
- YTD
- -1.88%
- 6M
- -1.19%
- 1Y
- 2.70%
- 3Y*
- 6.43%
- 5Y*
- 4.64%
- 10Y*
- 5.15%
FFRAX
- 1D
- 0.11%
- 1M
- 0.34%
- YTD
- -0.66%
- 6M
- 0.65%
- 1Y
- 4.50%
- 3Y*
- 6.53%
- 5Y*
- 4.76%
- 10Y*
- 4.62%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
EIFAX vs. FFRAX - Expense Ratio Comparison
EIFAX has a 0.47% expense ratio, which is lower than FFRAX's 0.98% expense ratio.
Return for Risk
EIFAX vs. FFRAX — Risk / Return Rank
EIFAX
FFRAX
EIFAX vs. FFRAX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Eaton Vance Floating-Rate Advantage Fund (EIFAX) and Fidelity Advisor Floating Rate High Income Fund Class A (FFRAX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| EIFAX | FFRAX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 0.82 | 1.33 | -0.51 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 1.20 | 1.85 | -0.65 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.25 | 1.44 | -0.19 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.22 | 1.69 | -0.47 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 3.93 | 8.19 | -4.26 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| EIFAX | FFRAX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.82 | 1.33 | -0.51 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 1.50 | 1.69 | -0.18 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 1.16 | 1.12 | +0.04 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 1.17 | 1.15 | +0.02 |
Correlation
The correlation between EIFAX and FFRAX is 0.67, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.
Dividends
EIFAX vs. FFRAX - Dividend Comparison
EIFAX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 7.40%, more than FFRAX's 6.48% yield.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
EIFAX Eaton Vance Floating-Rate Advantage Fund | 7.40% | 8.09% | 8.91% | 7.02% | 5.92% | 4.03% | 4.51% | 5.58% | 5.10% | 4.46% | 5.02% | 5.29% |
FFRAX Fidelity Advisor Floating Rate High Income Fund Class A | 6.48% | 7.12% | 6.69% | 7.24% | 3.57% | 2.47% | 3.56% | 4.86% | 4.42% | 3.77% | 4.14% | 3.42% |
Drawdowns
EIFAX vs. FFRAX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum EIFAX drawdown since its inception was -40.28%, which is greater than FFRAX's maximum drawdown of -22.21%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for EIFAX and FFRAX.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| EIFAX | FFRAX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -40.28% | -22.21% | -18.07% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -2.45% | -2.73% | +0.28% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -7.63% | -6.02% | -1.61% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -24.22% | -22.21% | -2.01% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -2.18% | -0.77% | -1.41% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -2.28% | -1.03% | -1.25% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 0.79% | 0.58% | +0.21% |
Volatility
EIFAX vs. FFRAX - Volatility Comparison
Eaton Vance Floating-Rate Advantage Fund (EIFAX) has a higher volatility of 0.85% compared to Fidelity Advisor Floating Rate High Income Fund Class A (FFRAX) at 0.67%. This indicates that EIFAX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than FFRAX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| EIFAX | FFRAX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 0.85% | 0.67% | +0.18% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 1.83% | 1.70% | +0.13% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 3.31% | 3.33% | -0.02% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 3.10% | 2.84% | +0.26% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 4.45% | 4.12% | +0.33% |