PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
EIDO vs. KSA
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

EIDO vs. KSA - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in iShares MSCI Indonesia ETF (EIDO) and iShares MSCI Saudi Arabia ETF (KSA). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, EIDO achieves a -34.87% return, which is significantly lower than KSA's 4.97% return. Over the past 10 years, EIDO has underperformed KSA with an annualized return of -3.97%, while KSA has yielded a comparatively higher 7.46% annualized return.


EIDO

1D
-4.99%
1M
-17.26%
YTD
-34.87%
6M
-34.69%
1Y
-31.45%
3Y*
-16.90%
5Y*
-8.84%
10Y*
-3.97%

KSA

1D
-1.27%
1M
-1.32%
YTD
4.97%
6M
4.43%
1Y
3.56%
3Y*
0.52%
5Y*
1.95%
10Y*
7.46%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

EIDO vs. KSA - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
EIDO
iShares MSCI Indonesia ETF
-34.87%4.90%-13.02%2.56%-0.16%-0.60%-7.13%5.30%-10.88%19.40%
KSA
iShares MSCI Saudi Arabia ETF
4.97%-8.20%-0.19%15.05%-6.06%33.62%2.65%9.30%13.07%6.14%

Correlation

The correlation between EIDO and KSA is 0.17, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.17

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.29

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.29

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.31

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 18, 2015

0.31

The correlation between EIDO and KSA shifts across timeframes, from 0.17 (1 year) to 0.31 (10 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

EIDO vs. KSA - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
EIDO
KSA

Financial Services

37.8%
39.7%

Basic Materials

18.5%
13.3%

Energy

10.6%
13.0%

Communication Services

8.7%
8.2%

Consumer Defensive

7.5%
3.8%

Industrials

6.1%
4.4%

Technology

2.7%
2.2%

Utilities

2.4%
4.6%

Healthcare

2.4%
4.3%

Real Estate

1.8%
3.5%

Consumer Cyclical

1.6%
2.3%

Financial Services

EIDO
37.8%
KSA
39.7%

Basic Materials

EIDO
18.5%
KSA
13.3%

Energy

EIDO
10.6%
KSA
13.0%

Communication Services

EIDO
8.7%
KSA
8.2%

Consumer Defensive

EIDO
7.5%
KSA
3.8%

Industrials

EIDO
6.1%
KSA
4.4%

Technology

EIDO
2.7%
KSA
2.2%

Utilities

EIDO
2.4%
KSA
4.6%

Healthcare

EIDO
2.4%
KSA
4.3%

Real Estate

EIDO
1.8%
KSA
3.5%

Consumer Cyclical

EIDO
1.6%
KSA
2.3%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

EIDO vs. KSA — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

EIDO
EIDO Risk / Return Rank: 11
Overall Rank
EIDO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 00
Sharpe Ratio Rank
EIDO Sortino Ratio Rank: 11
Sortino Ratio Rank
EIDO Omega Ratio Rank: 00
Omega Ratio Rank
EIDO Calmar Ratio Rank: 22
Calmar Ratio Rank
EIDO Martin Ratio Rank: 00
Martin Ratio Rank

KSA
KSA Risk / Return Rank: 1212
Overall Rank
KSA Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1111
Sharpe Ratio Rank
KSA Sortino Ratio Rank: 1212
Sortino Ratio Rank
KSA Omega Ratio Rank: 1111
Omega Ratio Rank
KSA Calmar Ratio Rank: 1212
Calmar Ratio Rank
KSA Martin Ratio Rank: 1212
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

EIDO vs. KSA - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares MSCI Indonesia ETF (EIDO) and iShares MSCI Saudi Arabia ETF (KSA). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


EIDOKSADifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-1.63

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-2.43

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

0.75

1.05

-0.31

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

-0.86

0.31

-1.17

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

-2.63

0.69

-3.32

EIDO vs. KSA - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current EIDO Sharpe Ratio is -1.41, which is lower than the KSA Sharpe Ratio of 0.21. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of EIDO and KSA, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


EIDOKSADifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

-1.41

0.21

-1.63

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

-0.45

0.12

-0.57

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

-0.16

0.37

-0.53

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

-0.06

0.30

-0.37

Drawdowns

EIDO vs. KSA - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum EIDO drawdown since its inception was -63.21%, which is greater than KSA's maximum drawdown of -40.56%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for EIDO and KSA.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


EIDOKSADifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-63.21%

-40.56%

-22.65%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-36.63%

-11.62%

-25.01%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-45.60%

-15.56%

-30.04%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-45.60%

-28.08%

-17.52%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-59.41%

-40.56%

-18.85%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-55.54%

-16.69%

-38.85%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-24.63%

-11.43%

-13.20%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

11.98%

5.18%

+6.80%

Volatility

EIDO vs. KSA - Volatility Comparison

iShares MSCI Indonesia ETF (EIDO) has a higher volatility of 7.47% compared to iShares MSCI Saudi Arabia ETF (KSA) at 3.70%. This indicates that EIDO's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than KSA based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


EIDOKSADifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

7.47%

3.70%

+3.77%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

18.22%

12.20%

+6.02%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

22.35%

16.68%

+5.67%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

19.77%

15.88%

+3.89%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

24.77%

20.04%

+4.73%

EIDO vs. KSA - Expense Ratio Comparison

EIDO has a 0.59% expense ratio, which is lower than KSA's 0.74% expense ratio.


Dividends

EIDO vs. KSA - Dividend Comparison

EIDO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 5.46%, more than KSA's 2.81% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
EIDO
iShares MSCI Indonesia ETF
5.46%3.56%5.20%2.94%2.53%1.33%1.51%1.78%1.99%1.26%1.16%1.67%
KSA
iShares MSCI Saudi Arabia ETF
2.81%2.95%3.44%2.44%1.93%1.58%1.76%2.15%2.51%2.30%3.05%0.04%

Frequently Asked Questions


EIDO and KSA have a correlation of 0.17, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

EIDO has higher volatility (7.47%) compared to KSA (3.70%). In terms of maximum drawdown, EIDO dropped -63.21% vs KSA's -40.56%.

On 10-year performance, KSA leads with 7.46% vs -3.97% for EIDO. On fees, EIDO is cheaper at 0.59% per year. On volatility, KSA has been the lower-risk option at 3.70%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 10-year period, KSA has performed better with a 7.46% return vs -3.97%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

EIDO is cheaper with a 0.59% expense ratio, compared with 0.74% for KSA.

EIDO has the higher dividend yield at 5.46%, compared with 2.81% for KSA.

EIDO is categorized as Asia Pacific Equities, while KSA is Emerging Markets Equities. EIDO tracks MSCI Indonesia Investable Market Index, while KSA tracks MSCI Saudi Arabia Investable Market Index (IMI) 25/50 Index. Their fees differ too: 0.59% for EIDO and 0.74% for KSA.

KSA currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.21 vs -1.41), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for EIDO and KSA

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer