PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
EIDO vs. EWT
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

EIDO vs. EWT - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in iShares MSCI Indonesia ETF (EIDO) and iShares MSCI Taiwan ETF (EWT). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, EIDO achieves a -34.87% return, which is significantly lower than EWT's 68.27% return. Over the past 10 years, EIDO has underperformed EWT with an annualized return of -3.97%, while EWT has yielded a comparatively higher 19.90% annualized return.


EIDO

1D
-4.99%
1M
-17.26%
YTD
-34.87%
6M
-34.69%
1Y
-31.45%
3Y*
-16.90%
5Y*
-8.84%
10Y*
-3.97%

EWT

1D
-0.20%
1M
18.24%
YTD
68.27%
6M
72.42%
1Y
110.37%
3Y*
38.34%
5Y*
18.33%
10Y*
19.90%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

EIDO vs. EWT - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
EIDO
iShares MSCI Indonesia ETF
-34.87%4.90%-13.02%2.56%-0.16%-0.60%-7.13%5.30%-10.88%19.40%
EWT
iShares MSCI Taiwan ETF
68.27%28.38%16.11%23.97%-28.90%26.18%31.50%33.36%-9.90%26.81%

Correlation

The correlation between EIDO and EWT is 0.33, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.33

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.36

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.40

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.51

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since May 10, 2010

0.55

Over the past year, the correlation between EIDO and EWT has dropped to 0.33 - well below their long-term average of 0.55, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.

EIDO vs. EWT - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
EIDO
EWT

Financial Services

37.8%
13.0%

Basic Materials

18.5%
3.5%

Energy

10.6%

-

Communication Services

8.7%
1.9%

Consumer Defensive

7.5%
1.1%

Industrials

6.1%
4.9%

Technology

2.7%
72.9%

Utilities

2.4%

-

Healthcare

2.4%
0.8%

Real Estate

1.8%

-

Consumer Cyclical

1.6%
1.9%

Financial Services

EIDO
37.8%
EWT
13.0%

Basic Materials

EIDO
18.5%
EWT
3.5%

Energy

EIDO
10.6%
EWT

-

Communication Services

EIDO
8.7%
EWT
1.9%

Consumer Defensive

EIDO
7.5%
EWT
1.1%

Industrials

EIDO
6.1%
EWT
4.9%

Technology

EIDO
2.7%
EWT
72.9%

Utilities

EIDO
2.4%
EWT

-

Healthcare

EIDO
2.4%
EWT
0.8%

Real Estate

EIDO
1.8%
EWT

-

Consumer Cyclical

EIDO
1.6%
EWT
1.9%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

EIDO vs. EWT — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

EIDO
EIDO Risk / Return Rank: 11
Overall Rank
EIDO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 00
Sharpe Ratio Rank
EIDO Sortino Ratio Rank: 11
Sortino Ratio Rank
EIDO Omega Ratio Rank: 00
Omega Ratio Rank
EIDO Calmar Ratio Rank: 22
Calmar Ratio Rank
EIDO Martin Ratio Rank: 00
Martin Ratio Rank

EWT
EWT Risk / Return Rank: 9595
Overall Rank
EWT Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9696
Sharpe Ratio Rank
EWT Sortino Ratio Rank: 9494
Sortino Ratio Rank
EWT Omega Ratio Rank: 9494
Omega Ratio Rank
EWT Calmar Ratio Rank: 9797
Calmar Ratio Rank
EWT Martin Ratio Rank: 9595
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

EIDO vs. EWT - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares MSCI Indonesia ETF (EIDO) and iShares MSCI Taiwan ETF (EWT). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


EIDOEWTDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-5.83

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-6.96

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

0.75

1.69

-0.94

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

-0.86

10.56

-11.42

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

-2.63

32.40

-35.02

EIDO vs. EWT - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current EIDO Sharpe Ratio is -1.41, which is lower than the EWT Sharpe Ratio of 4.42. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of EIDO and EWT, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


EIDOEWTDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

-1.41

4.42

-5.83

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

-0.45

0.82

-1.27

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

-0.16

0.92

-1.09

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

-0.06

0.26

-0.32

Drawdowns

EIDO vs. EWT - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum EIDO drawdown since its inception was -63.21%, roughly equal to the maximum EWT drawdown of -64.37%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for EIDO and EWT.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


EIDOEWTDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-63.21%

-64.37%

+1.16%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-36.63%

-10.51%

-26.12%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-45.60%

-25.66%

-19.94%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-45.60%

-38.88%

-6.72%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-59.41%

-38.88%

-20.53%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-55.54%

-0.20%

-55.34%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-24.63%

-19.23%

-5.40%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

11.98%

3.42%

+8.56%

Volatility

EIDO vs. EWT - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for iShares MSCI Indonesia ETF (EIDO) is 7.47%, while iShares MSCI Taiwan ETF (EWT) has a volatility of 10.43%. This indicates that EIDO experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than EWT based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


EIDOEWTDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

7.47%

10.43%

-2.96%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

18.22%

20.52%

-2.30%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

22.35%

25.10%

-2.75%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

19.77%

22.59%

-2.82%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

24.77%

21.60%

+3.17%

EIDO vs. EWT - Expense Ratio Comparison

Both EIDO and EWT have an expense ratio of 0.59%.


Dividends

EIDO vs. EWT - Dividend Comparison

EIDO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 5.46%, more than EWT's 2.63% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
EIDO
iShares MSCI Indonesia ETF
5.46%3.56%5.20%2.94%2.53%1.33%1.51%1.78%1.99%1.26%1.16%1.67%
EWT
iShares MSCI Taiwan ETF
2.63%4.43%3.32%8.12%18.82%0.55%1.83%2.49%3.16%2.81%2.39%3.12%

Frequently Asked Questions


EIDO and EWT have a correlation of 0.33, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

EWT has higher volatility (10.43%) compared to EIDO (7.47%). In terms of maximum drawdown, EIDO dropped -63.21% vs EWT's -64.37%.

On 10-year performance, EWT leads with 19.90% vs -3.97% for EIDO. Both ETFs have the same 0.59% expense ratio. On volatility, EIDO has been the lower-risk option at 7.47%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 10-year period, EWT has performed better with a 19.90% return vs -3.97%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

EIDO and EWT have the same expense ratio: 0.59% per year.

EIDO has the higher dividend yield at 5.46%, compared with 2.63% for EWT.

EIDO tracks MSCI Indonesia Investable Market Index, while EWT tracks MSCI Taiwan Index.

EWT currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (4.42 vs -1.41), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for EIDO and EWT

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer