EICOX vs. QAMNX

Last updated Aug 1, 2026

EICOX (Eaton Vance Emerging and Frontier Countries Equity Fund) and QAMNX (Federated Hermes MDT Market Neutral A) are both mutual funds - EICOX is a Emerging Markets Equities fund managed by Eaton Vance, while QAMNX is a Long-Short fund managed by Federated. Over the past 3 years, EICOX returned 20.87%/yr vs 12.11%/yr for QAMNX. Their -0.02 correlation means they have often moved in opposite directions in the past. EICOX charges 1.31%/yr vs 1.86%/yr for QAMNX.

Performance

EICOX vs. QAMNX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Eaton Vance Emerging and Frontier Countries Equity Fund (EICOX) and Federated Hermes MDT Market Neutral A (QAMNX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, EICOX achieves a 16.70% return, which is significantly higher than QAMNX's 4.61% return.

EICOX

• 1D: 4.24%
• 1M: -3.95%
• 6M: 5.58%
• YTD: 16.70%
• 1Y: 30.87%
• 3Y*: 20.87%
• 5Y*: 14.29%
• 10Y*: 11.94%
• ALL TIME*: 9.50%

QAMNX

• 1D: 0.54%
• 1M: 3.68%
• 6M: 5.25%
• YTD: 4.61%
• 1Y: 8.81%
• 3Y*: 12.11%
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —
• ALL TIME*: 12.00%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison

Position	Avg. Volume Value (2W)	Avg. Volume Value (1M)	Avg. Volume Value (3M)
EICOX Eaton Vance Emerging and Frontier Countries Equity Fund	$0.00	$0.00	$0.00
QAMNX Federated Hermes MDT Market Neutral A	$0.00	$0.00	$0.00

EICOX vs. QAMNX - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021
EICOX Eaton Vance Emerging and Frontier Countries Equity Fund	16.70%	33.22%	11.99%	25.78%	-14.59%	4.90%
QAMNX Federated Hermes MDT Market Neutral A	4.61%	10.00%	17.33%	4.71%	9.19%	12.29%

Correlation

The correlation between EICOX and QAMNX is -0.12, meaning they have often moved in opposite directions in the past. This relationship can weaken or reverse as market conditions change.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.	-0.12
Correlation (3Y) Balances recent behavior with more history.	-0.05
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 22, 2021	-0.02

Return for Risk

EICOX vs. QAMNX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

EICOX

EICOX Risk / Return Rank: 54
EICOX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 54
EICOX Sortino Ratio Rank: 49
EICOX Omega Ratio Rank: 63
EICOX Calmar Ratio Rank: 60
EICOX Martin Ratio Rank: 46

QAMNX

QAMNX Risk / Return Rank: 54
QAMNX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 53
QAMNX Sortino Ratio Rank: 57
QAMNX Omega Ratio Rank: 61
QAMNX Calmar Ratio Rank: 68
QAMNX Martin Ratio Rank: 34

The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

EICOX vs. QAMNX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Eaton Vance Emerging and Frontier Countries Equity Fund (EICOX) and Federated Hermes MDT Market Neutral A (QAMNX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	EICOX	QAMNX	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	1.40	1.34	+0.05
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	1.92	2.02	-0.11
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.28	1.27	+0.01
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	2.05	2.18	-0.13
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	6.48	4.83	+1.65

EICOX vs. QAMNX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current EICOX Sharpe Ratio is 1.40, which is comparable to the QAMNX Sharpe Ratio of 1.34. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of EICOX and QAMNX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

EICOX vs. QAMNX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum EICOX drawdown since its inception was -38.75%, which is greater than QAMNX's maximum drawdown of -17.97%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for EICOX and QAMNX.

Drawdown Indicators

	EICOX	QAMNX	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-38.75%	-17.97%	-20.78%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-14.22%	-4.16%	-10.06%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-14.22%	-4.16%	-10.06%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-22.46%	—	—
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-38.75%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-10.58%	0.00%	-10.58%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-8.65%	-5.03%	-3.62%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	4.48%	1.87%	+2.61%

Volatility

EICOX vs. QAMNX - Volatility Comparison

Eaton Vance Emerging and Frontier Countries Equity Fund (EICOX) has a higher volatility of 9.46% compared to Federated Hermes MDT Market Neutral A (QAMNX) at 1.55%. This indicates that EICOX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than QAMNX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	EICOX	QAMNX	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	9.46%	1.55%	+7.91%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	19.59%	4.50%	+15.09%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	20.85%	6.74%	+14.11%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	14.98%	13.68%	+1.30%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	14.17%	13.68%	+0.49%

EICOX vs. QAMNX - Expense Ratio Comparison

EICOX has a 1.31% expense ratio, which is lower than QAMNX's 1.86% expense ratio.

Dividends

EICOX vs. QAMNX - Dividend Comparison

EICOX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.16%, more than QAMNX's 1.46% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
EICOX Eaton Vance Emerging and Frontier Countries Equity Fund	3.16%	3.68%	2.02%	1.95%	5.72%	2.71%	0.10%	2.00%	2.95%	0.00%	0.59%	2.35%
QAMNX Federated Hermes MDT Market Neutral A	1.46%	1.53%	1.85%	5.89%	11.74%	20.80%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both EICOX and QAMNX in my portfolio?

EICOX and QAMNX have a correlation of -0.12, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, EICOX or QAMNX?

EICOX has higher volatility (9.46%) compared to QAMNX (1.55%). In terms of maximum drawdown, EICOX dropped -38.75% vs QAMNX's -17.97%.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

EICOX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.40 vs 1.34), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.