EICOX vs. FRDM
EICOX (Eaton Vance Emerging and Frontier Countries Equity Fund) and FRDM (Freedom 100 Emerging Markets ETF) are both Emerging Markets Diversified funds. Over the past 5 years, EICOX returned 16.74%/yr vs 20.53%/yr for FRDM. A 0.78 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. EICOX charges 1.31%/yr vs 0.49%/yr for FRDM.
Performance
EICOX vs. FRDM - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, EICOX achieves a 30.08% return, which is significantly lower than FRDM's 49.24% return.
EICOX
- 1D
- 2.98%
- 1M
- 9.01%
- YTD
- 30.08%
- 6M
- 32.28%
- 1Y
- 55.02%
- 3Y*
- 27.47%
- 5Y*
- 16.74%
- 10Y*
- 13.70%
FRDM
- 1D
- 0.13%
- 1M
- 12.84%
- YTD
- 49.24%
- 6M
- 53.92%
- 1Y
- 101.71%
- 3Y*
- 38.21%
- 5Y*
- 20.53%
- 10Y*
- —
EICOX vs. FRDM - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
EICOX Eaton Vance Emerging and Frontier Countries Equity Fund | 30.08% | 33.22% | 11.99% | 25.78% | -14.59% | 13.43% | 13.46% | 8.45% |
FRDM Freedom 100 Emerging Markets ETF | 49.24% | 61.27% | 1.70% | 22.77% | -14.45% | 6.13% | 16.90% | 12.23% |
Correlation
The correlation between EICOX and FRDM is 0.85, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.85 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.80 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.78 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since May 23, 2019 | 0.78 |
The correlation between EICOX and FRDM has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.78 to 0.85 - a consistent structural relationship.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
EICOX vs. FRDM — Risk / Return Rank
EICOX
FRDM
EICOX vs. FRDM - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Eaton Vance Emerging and Frontier Countries Equity Fund (EICOX) and Freedom 100 Emerging Markets ETF (FRDM). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| EICOX | FRDM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.73 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.40 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.61 | 1.63 | -0.02 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 4.10 | 6.06 | -1.97 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 15.28 | 23.38 | -8.10 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
EICOX vs. FRDM - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum EICOX drawdown since its inception was -38.75%, roughly equal to the maximum FRDM drawdown of -40.49%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for EICOX and FRDM.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| EICOX | FRDM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -38.75% | -40.49% | +1.74% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -13.40% | -16.87% | +3.47% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -14.11% | -16.87% | +2.76% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -22.46% | -29.25% | +6.79% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -38.75% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -8.66% | -7.07% | -1.59% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 3.59% | 4.37% | -0.78% |
Volatility
EICOX vs. FRDM - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Eaton Vance Emerging and Frontier Countries Equity Fund (EICOX) is 9.68%, while Freedom 100 Emerging Markets ETF (FRDM) has a volatility of 14.15%. This indicates that EICOX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than FRDM based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| EICOX | FRDM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 9.68% | 14.15% | -4.47% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 16.71% | 24.80% | -8.09% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 18.15% | 27.26% | -9.11% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 14.25% | 21.48% | -7.23% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 13.86% | 23.15% | -9.29% |
EICOX vs. FRDM - Expense Ratio Comparison
EICOX has a 1.31% expense ratio, which is higher than FRDM's 0.49% expense ratio.
Dividends
EICOX vs. FRDM - Dividend Comparison
EICOX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.83%, more than FRDM's 1.47% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
EICOX Eaton Vance Emerging and Frontier Countries Equity Fund | 2.83% | 3.68% | 2.02% | 1.95% | 5.72% | 2.71% | 0.10% | 2.00% | 2.95% | 0.00% | 0.59% | 2.35% |
FRDM Freedom 100 Emerging Markets ETF | 1.47% | 2.26% | 2.53% | 2.66% | 2.72% | 2.17% | 1.11% | 1.07% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
EICOX and FRDM have a correlation of 0.85, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
FRDM has higher volatility (14.15%) compared to EICOX (9.68%). In terms of maximum drawdown, EICOX dropped -38.75% vs FRDM's -40.49%.
FRDM currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (3.76 vs 3.03), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for EICOX and FRDM
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer