PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
EICOX vs. ETG
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

EICOX vs. ETG - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Eaton Vance Emerging and Frontier Countries Equity Fund (EICOX) and Eaton Vance Tax Advantaged Global Dividend Income Closed Fund (ETG). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, EICOX achieves a 16.70% return, which is significantly higher than ETG's 6.39% return. Over the past 10 years, EICOX has underperformed ETG with an annualized return of 11.94%, while ETG has yielded a comparatively higher 13.16% annualized return.


EICOX

1D
4.24%
1M
-3.95%
6M
5.58%
YTD
16.70%
1Y
30.87%
3Y*
20.87%
5Y*
14.29%
10Y*
11.94%
ALL TIME*
9.50%

ETG

1D
-0.08%
1M
1.20%
6M
4.53%
YTD
6.39%
1Y
25.14%
3Y*
19.93%
5Y*
10.92%
10Y*
13.16%
ALL TIME*
8.86%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison


PositionAvg. Volume Value (2W)Avg. Volume Value (1M)Avg. Volume Value (3M)
$0.00$0.00$0.00
$2.17M$1.84M$2.45M

EICOX vs. ETG - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
EICOX
Eaton Vance Emerging and Frontier Countries Equity Fund
16.70%33.22%11.99%25.78%-14.59%13.43%13.46%12.59%-14.57%31.41%
ETG
Eaton Vance Tax Advantaged Global Dividend Income Closed Fund
6.39%36.92%15.46%21.97%-27.62%33.08%10.08%43.62%-15.90%33.55%

Correlation

The correlation between EICOX and ETG is 0.66, which is moderate. They have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently, sharing some price drivers without tracking each other closely.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.

0.66

Correlation (3Y)
Balances recent behavior with more history.

0.64

Correlation (5Y)
Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period.

0.64

Correlation (10Y)
Provides a long-term view across more market conditions.

0.62

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 2, 2015

0.63

The correlation between EICOX and ETG has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.62 to 0.66 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

EICOX vs. ETG — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

EICOX
EICOX Risk / Return Rank: 5454
Overall Rank
EICOX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5454
Sharpe Ratio Rank
EICOX Sortino Ratio Rank: 4949
Sortino Ratio Rank
EICOX Omega Ratio Rank: 6363
Omega Ratio Rank
EICOX Calmar Ratio Rank: 6060
Calmar Ratio Rank
EICOX Martin Ratio Rank: 4646
Martin Ratio Rank

ETG
ETG Risk / Return Rank: 4646
Overall Rank
ETG Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5656
Sharpe Ratio Rank
ETG Sortino Ratio Rank: 5555
Sortino Ratio Rank
ETG Omega Ratio Rank: 5252
Omega Ratio Rank
ETG Calmar Ratio Rank: 3131
Calmar Ratio Rank
ETG Martin Ratio Rank: 3737
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

EICOX vs. ETG - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Eaton Vance Emerging and Frontier Countries Equity Fund (EICOX) and Eaton Vance Tax Advantaged Global Dividend Income Closed Fund (ETG). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


EICOXETGDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.02

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.06

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.28

1.25

+0.03

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.05

1.34

+0.71

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

6.48

5.31

+1.17

EICOX vs. ETG - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current EICOX Sharpe Ratio is 1.40, which is comparable to the ETG Sharpe Ratio of 1.38. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of EICOX and ETG, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

EICOX vs. ETG - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum EICOX drawdown since its inception was -38.75%, smaller than the maximum ETG drawdown of -74.76%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for EICOX and ETG.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


EICOXETGDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-38.75%

-74.76%

+36.01%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-14.22%

-16.64%

+2.42%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-14.22%

-16.95%

+2.73%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-22.46%

-31.64%

+9.18%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-38.75%

-51.53%

+12.78%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-10.58%

-0.08%

-10.50%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-8.65%

-13.39%

+4.74%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

4.48%

4.20%

+0.28%

Volatility

EICOX vs. ETG - Volatility Comparison

Eaton Vance Emerging and Frontier Countries Equity Fund (EICOX) has a higher volatility of 9.46% compared to Eaton Vance Tax Advantaged Global Dividend Income Closed Fund (ETG) at 4.72%. This indicates that EICOX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than ETG based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


EICOXETGDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

9.46%

4.72%

+4.74%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

19.59%

13.42%

+6.17%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

20.85%

16.20%

+4.65%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

14.98%

19.87%

-4.89%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

14.17%

21.20%

-7.03%

EICOX vs. ETG - Expense Ratio Comparison

EICOX has a 1.31% expense ratio, which is lower than ETG's 2.57% expense ratio.


Dividends

EICOX vs. ETG - Dividend Comparison

EICOX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.16%, less than ETG's 6.57% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
EICOX
Eaton Vance Emerging and Frontier Countries Equity Fund
3.16%3.68%2.02%1.95%5.72%2.71%0.10%2.00%2.95%0.00%0.59%2.35%
ETG
Eaton Vance Tax Advantaged Global Dividend Income Closed Fund
6.57%6.72%8.03%7.02%9.94%6.02%6.74%6.83%9.08%7.69%8.74%7.93%

Frequently Asked Questions


EICOX and ETG have a correlation of 0.66, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

EICOX has higher volatility (9.46%) compared to ETG (4.72%). In terms of maximum drawdown, EICOX dropped -38.75% vs ETG's -74.76%.

EICOX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.40 vs 1.38), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for EICOX and ETG

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer