EIBLX vs. XPTFX
Compare and contrast key facts about Eaton Vance Floating Rate Fund (EIBLX) and Federated Hermes Project and Trade Finance Tender Fund (XPTFX).
EIBLX is managed by Eaton Vance. It was launched on Jan 29, 2001. XPTFX is managed by Federated. It was launched on Jan 31, 2017.
Performance
EIBLX vs. XPTFX - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
EIBLX vs. XPTFX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
EIBLX Eaton Vance Floating Rate Fund | -1.32% | 3.90% | 8.14% | 12.29% | -2.34% | 4.33% | 2.38% | 7.07% | 0.81% | 3.80% |
XPTFX Federated Hermes Project and Trade Finance Tender Fund | 1.41% | 7.47% | 8.62% | 8.55% | 3.74% | 1.91% | 2.18% | 4.70% | 4.47% | -0.10% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, EIBLX achieves a -1.32% return, which is significantly lower than XPTFX's 1.41% return.
EIBLX
- 1D
- 0.00%
- 1M
- -0.25%
- YTD
- -1.32%
- 6M
- -0.79%
- 1Y
- 2.47%
- 3Y*
- 6.50%
- 5Y*
- 4.58%
- 10Y*
- 4.78%
XPTFX
- 1D
- 0.00%
- 1M
- 0.41%
- YTD
- 1.41%
- 6M
- 3.05%
- 1Y
- 7.24%
- 3Y*
- 8.09%
- 5Y*
- 6.17%
- 10Y*
- —
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
EIBLX vs. XPTFX - Expense Ratio Comparison
EIBLX has a 0.76% expense ratio, which is higher than XPTFX's 0.41% expense ratio.
Return for Risk
EIBLX vs. XPTFX — Risk / Return Rank
EIBLX
XPTFX
EIBLX vs. XPTFX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Eaton Vance Floating Rate Fund (EIBLX) and Federated Hermes Project and Trade Finance Tender Fund (XPTFX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| EIBLX | XPTFX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 0.90 | 2.39 | -1.50 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 1.36 | 3.44 | -2.08 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.27 | 2.98 | -1.71 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.40 | 2.46 | -1.06 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 4.77 | 7.69 | -2.92 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| EIBLX | XPTFX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.90 | 2.39 | -1.50 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 1.68 | 2.46 | -0.78 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 1.36 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 1.25 | 2.31 | -1.06 |
Correlation
The correlation between EIBLX and XPTFX is 0.10, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.
Dividends
EIBLX vs. XPTFX - Dividend Comparison
EIBLX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 6.86%, more than XPTFX's 6.12% yield.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
EIBLX Eaton Vance Floating Rate Fund | 6.86% | 7.58% | 8.29% | 8.58% | 5.02% | 3.32% | 3.68% | 5.01% | 4.46% | 3.82% | 4.14% | 4.33% |
XPTFX Federated Hermes Project and Trade Finance Tender Fund | 6.12% | 7.24% | 6.78% | 6.66% | 5.70% | 2.21% | 2.74% | 4.62% | 4.60% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Drawdowns
EIBLX vs. XPTFX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum EIBLX drawdown since its inception was -32.53%, which is greater than XPTFX's maximum drawdown of -2.95%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for EIBLX and XPTFX.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| EIBLX | XPTFX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -32.53% | -2.95% | -29.58% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -1.95% | -1.96% | +0.01% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -6.27% | -2.95% | -3.32% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -18.70% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -1.68% | -0.57% | -1.11% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -1.66% | -0.27% | -1.39% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 0.61% | 0.63% | -0.02% |
Volatility
EIBLX vs. XPTFX - Volatility Comparison
Eaton Vance Floating Rate Fund (EIBLX) has a higher volatility of 0.55% compared to Federated Hermes Project and Trade Finance Tender Fund (XPTFX) at 0.30%. This indicates that EIBLX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than XPTFX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| EIBLX | XPTFX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 0.55% | 0.30% | +0.25% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 1.60% | 2.89% | -1.29% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.80% | 3.80% | -1.00% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 2.74% | 2.52% | +0.22% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 3.53% | 2.03% | +1.50% |