PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
EIB3.DE vs. XCHA.DE
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

EIB3.DE vs. XCHA.DE - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a €10,000 investment in Invesco Euro Government Bond 1-3 Year UCITS ETF Dist (EIB3.DE) and Xtrackers CSI 300 Swap UCITS ETF 1C (XCHA.DE). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, EIB3.DE achieves a 0.14% return, which is significantly lower than XCHA.DE's 12.37% return.


EIB3.DE

1D
0.03%
1M
-0.13%
6M
0.17%
YTD
0.14%
1Y
0.87%
3Y*
2.75%
5Y*
0.66%
10Y*

XCHA.DE

1D
-0.27%
1M
-0.32%
6M
8.98%
YTD
12.37%
1Y
35.81%
3Y*
13.43%
5Y*
3.31%
10Y*
8.22%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

EIB3.DE vs. XCHA.DE - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025202420232022202120202019
EIB3.DE
Invesco Euro Government Bond 1-3 Year UCITS ETF Dist
0.14%2.28%3.03%3.41%-4.93%-0.78%-0.13%-0.45%
XCHA.DE
Xtrackers CSI 300 Swap UCITS ETF 1C
12.37%14.66%24.36%-14.24%-19.19%13.31%31.26%9.52%

Correlation

The correlation between EIB3.DE and XCHA.DE is 0.06, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.06

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

-0.02

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

-0.01

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 28, 2019

-0.01

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

EIB3.DE vs. XCHA.DE — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

EIB3.DE
EIB3.DE Risk / Return Rank: 1616
Overall Rank
EIB3.DE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1616
Sharpe Ratio Rank
EIB3.DE Sortino Ratio Rank: 1313
Sortino Ratio Rank
EIB3.DE Omega Ratio Rank: 1414
Omega Ratio Rank
EIB3.DE Calmar Ratio Rank: 1818
Calmar Ratio Rank
EIB3.DE Martin Ratio Rank: 2222
Martin Ratio Rank

XCHA.DE
XCHA.DE Risk / Return Rank: 8282
Overall Rank
XCHA.DE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7979
Sharpe Ratio Rank
XCHA.DE Sortino Ratio Rank: 7777
Sortino Ratio Rank
XCHA.DE Omega Ratio Rank: 7676
Omega Ratio Rank
XCHA.DE Calmar Ratio Rank: 9494
Calmar Ratio Rank
XCHA.DE Martin Ratio Rank: 8686
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

EIB3.DE vs. XCHA.DE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Invesco Euro Government Bond 1-3 Year UCITS ETF Dist (EIB3.DE) and Xtrackers CSI 300 Swap UCITS ETF 1C (XCHA.DE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


EIB3.DEXCHA.DEDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-1.66

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-2.22

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.07

1.36

-0.28

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

0.60

5.39

-4.79

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

2.09

13.95

-11.86

EIB3.DE vs. XCHA.DE - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current EIB3.DE Sharpe Ratio is 0.36, which is lower than the XCHA.DE Sharpe Ratio of 2.02. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of EIB3.DE and XCHA.DE, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

EIB3.DE vs. XCHA.DE - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum EIB3.DE drawdown since its inception was -6.78%, smaller than the maximum XCHA.DE drawdown of -52.27%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for EIB3.DE and XCHA.DE.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


EIB3.DEXCHA.DEDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-6.78%

-52.27%

+45.49%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-1.43%

-6.61%

+5.18%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-1.43%

-26.34%

+24.91%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-5.91%

-37.05%

+31.14%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-38.54%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.39%

-5.10%

+4.71%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-2.01%

-24.36%

+22.35%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

0.41%

2.56%

-2.15%

Volatility

EIB3.DE vs. XCHA.DE - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Invesco Euro Government Bond 1-3 Year UCITS ETF Dist (EIB3.DE) is 0.81%, while Xtrackers CSI 300 Swap UCITS ETF 1C (XCHA.DE) has a volatility of 8.41%. This indicates that EIB3.DE experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than XCHA.DE based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


EIB3.DEXCHA.DEDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

0.81%

8.41%

-7.60%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

2.07%

13.00%

-10.93%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.39%

17.64%

-15.25%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

1.93%

21.42%

-19.49%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

1.73%

22.24%

-20.51%

EIB3.DE vs. XCHA.DE - Expense Ratio Comparison

EIB3.DE has a 0.10% expense ratio, which is lower than XCHA.DE's 0.50% expense ratio.


Dividends

EIB3.DE vs. XCHA.DE - Dividend Comparison

EIB3.DE's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.34%, while XCHA.DE has not paid dividends to shareholders.


PositionTTM2025202420232022
EIB3.DE
Invesco Euro Government Bond 1-3 Year UCITS ETF Dist
2.34%2.51%2.80%2.24%0.23%
XCHA.DE
Xtrackers CSI 300 Swap UCITS ETF 1C
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


EIB3.DE and XCHA.DE have a correlation of 0.06, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, EIB3.DE is cheaper at 0.10% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

EIB3.DE is cheaper with a 0.10% expense ratio, compared with 0.50% for XCHA.DE.

EIB3.DE is categorized as European Government Bonds, while XCHA.DE is China Equities. EIB3.DE tracks Bloomberg Euro Government Select 1-3, while XCHA.DE tracks MSCI China A Onshore NR CNY. They also come from different issuers: Invesco and Xtrackers. Their fees differ too: 0.10% for EIB3.DE and 0.50% for XCHA.DE.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for EIB3.DE and XCHA.DE

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer