EIAMX vs. EIHMX
Compare and contrast key facts about Eaton Vance Multi-Asset Credit Fund (EIAMX) and Eaton Vance National Municipal Income Fund Class I (EIHMX).
EIAMX is managed by Eaton Vance. It was launched on Oct 31, 2011. EIHMX is an actively managed fund by Eaton Vance. It was launched on Dec 3, 1993.
Performance
EIAMX vs. EIHMX - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
EIAMX vs. EIHMX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
EIAMX Eaton Vance Multi-Asset Credit Fund | -0.88% | 6.31% | 8.22% | 9.93% | -6.18% | 4.57% | 1.89% | 11.67% | -2.45% | 11.61% |
EIHMX Eaton Vance National Municipal Income Fund Class I | -0.23% | 3.93% | 2.56% | 7.23% | -9.70% | 1.73% | 6.06% | 8.74% | 2.04% | 4.95% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, EIAMX achieves a -0.88% return, which is significantly lower than EIHMX's -0.23% return. Over the past 10 years, EIAMX has outperformed EIHMX with an annualized return of 4.80%, while EIHMX has yielded a comparatively lower 2.65% annualized return.
EIAMX
- 1D
- 0.21%
- 1M
- -1.13%
- YTD
- -0.88%
- 6M
- 0.17%
- 1Y
- 4.85%
- 3Y*
- 6.66%
- 5Y*
- 3.95%
- 10Y*
- 4.80%
EIHMX
- 1D
- 0.22%
- 1M
- -2.17%
- YTD
- -0.23%
- 6M
- 1.34%
- 1Y
- 3.55%
- 3Y*
- 3.42%
- 5Y*
- 1.00%
- 10Y*
- 2.65%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
EIAMX vs. EIHMX - Expense Ratio Comparison
EIAMX has a 0.71% expense ratio, which is higher than EIHMX's 0.41% expense ratio.
Return for Risk
EIAMX vs. EIHMX — Risk / Return Rank
EIAMX
EIHMX
EIAMX vs. EIHMX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Eaton Vance Multi-Asset Credit Fund (EIAMX) and Eaton Vance National Municipal Income Fund Class I (EIHMX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| EIAMX | EIHMX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 1.80 | 0.71 | +1.09 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 2.96 | 0.98 | +1.97 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.55 | 1.20 | +0.35 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.50 | 0.91 | +1.60 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 11.20 | 2.59 | +8.61 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| EIAMX | EIHMX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.80 | 0.71 | +1.09 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 1.25 | 0.22 | +1.04 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.21 | 0.61 | -0.39 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.22 | 0.72 | -0.50 |
Correlation
The correlation between EIAMX and EIHMX is 0.19, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.
Dividends
EIAMX vs. EIHMX - Dividend Comparison
EIAMX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 6.51%, more than EIHMX's 4.02% yield.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
EIAMX Eaton Vance Multi-Asset Credit Fund | 6.51% | 7.04% | 7.35% | 5.52% | 5.46% | 4.10% | 4.46% | 4.94% | 2.41% | 2.88% | 3.15% | 3.77% |
EIHMX Eaton Vance National Municipal Income Fund Class I | 4.02% | 4.99% | 4.38% | 3.21% | 3.30% | 2.40% | 2.90% | 3.88% | 3.87% | 3.90% | 4.10% | 4.12% |
Drawdowns
EIAMX vs. EIHMX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum EIAMX drawdown since its inception was -43.35%, which is greater than EIHMX's maximum drawdown of -39.87%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for EIAMX and EIHMX.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| EIAMX | EIHMX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -43.35% | -39.87% | -3.48% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -2.14% | -5.46% | +3.32% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -10.02% | -15.32% | +5.30% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -43.35% | -15.32% | -28.03% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -10.97% | -2.49% | -8.48% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -16.21% | -3.52% | -12.69% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 0.48% | 1.91% | -1.43% |
Volatility
EIAMX vs. EIHMX - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Eaton Vance Multi-Asset Credit Fund (EIAMX) is 0.73%, while Eaton Vance National Municipal Income Fund Class I (EIHMX) has a volatility of 1.28%. This indicates that EIAMX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than EIHMX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| EIAMX | EIHMX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 0.73% | 1.28% | -0.55% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 1.72% | 1.98% | -0.26% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.74% | 5.72% | -2.98% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 3.17% | 4.64% | -1.47% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 22.48% | 4.40% | +18.08% |