EHY vs. SWAN
EHY (Amplify Ethereum Max Income Covered Call ETF) and SWAN (Amplify BlackSwan Growth & Treasury Core ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - EHY is a Cryptocurrency fund actively managed by Amplify, while SWAN is a Diversified Portfolio fund tracking the S-Network BlackSwan Core Index. EHY is actively managed, while SWAN is passively managed. Their 0.46 correlation means their historical movements had little consistent relationship. EHY charges 0.75%/yr vs 0.49%/yr for SWAN.
Performance
EHY vs. SWAN - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, EHY achieves a -36.53% return, which is significantly lower than SWAN's 5.77% return.
EHY
- 1D
- 2.28%
- 1M
- 12.11%
- 6M
- -17.76%
- YTD
- -36.53%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
- ALL TIME*
- —
SWAN
- 1D
- -0.03%
- 1M
- 0.94%
- 6M
- 6.23%
- YTD
- 5.77%
- 1Y
- 12.67%
- 3Y*
- 12.88%
- 5Y*
- 2.59%
- 10Y*
- —
- ALL TIME*
- 7.05%
Liquidity Comparison
| Position | Avg. Volume Value (2W) | Avg. Volume Value (1M) | Avg. Volume Value (3M) |
|---|---|---|---|
| $63.17K | $39.74K | $73.16K | |
| $317.79K | $263.11K | $356.70K |
EHY vs. SWAN - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
EHY Amplify Ethereum Max Income Covered Call ETF | -36.53% | -25.56% |
SWAN Amplify BlackSwan Growth & Treasury Core ETF | 5.77% | 0.74% |
Correlation
The correlation between EHY and SWAN is 0.46, which is low. Their historical price movements had little consistent relationship.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 9, 2025 | 0.46 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
EHY vs. SWAN — Risk / Return Rank
EHY
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
SWAN
EHY vs. SWAN - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Amplify Ethereum Max Income Covered Call ETF (EHY) and Amplify BlackSwan Growth & Treasury Core ETF (SWAN). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| EHY | SWAN | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | — | 1.22 | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | — | 1.81 | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | — | 6.39 | — |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
EHY vs. SWAN - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum EHY drawdown since its inception was -61.70%, which is greater than SWAN's maximum drawdown of -31.04%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for EHY and SWAN.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| EHY | SWAN | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -61.70% | -31.04% | -30.66% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | — | -7.05% | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | — | -10.19% | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -31.04% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -52.84% | -0.08% | -52.76% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -37.86% | -8.73% | -29.13% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | — | 1.99% | — |
Volatility
EHY vs. SWAN - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| EHY | SWAN | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | — | 3.42% | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | — | 8.41% | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 59.54% | 10.28% | +49.26% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 59.54% | 11.51% | +48.03% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 59.54% | 12.47% | +47.07% |
EHY vs. SWAN - Expense Ratio Comparison
EHY has a 0.75% expense ratio, which is higher than SWAN's 0.49% expense ratio.
Dividends
EHY vs. SWAN - Dividend Comparison
EHY's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 59.23%, more than SWAN's 3.15% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
EHY Amplify Ethereum Max Income Covered Call ETF | 59.23% | 8.87% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
SWAN Amplify BlackSwan Growth & Treasury Core ETF | 3.15% | 2.86% | 2.54% | 2.98% | 2.12% | 5.04% | 1.64% | 3.69% | 0.29% |
Frequently Asked Questions
EHY and SWAN have a correlation of 0.46, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, SWAN is cheaper at 0.49% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
SWAN is cheaper with a 0.49% expense ratio, compared with 0.75% for EHY.
EHY has the higher dividend yield at 59.23%, compared with 3.15% for SWAN.
EHY is categorized as Cryptocurrency, while SWAN is Diversified Portfolio. Their fees differ too: 0.75% for EHY and 0.49% for SWAN.
Find the right allocation for EHY and SWAN
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer