EHY vs. SWAN
EHY (Amplify Ethereum Max Income Covered Call ETF) and SWAN (Amplify BlackSwan Growth & Treasury Core ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - EHY is a Cryptocurrency fund actively managed by Amplify, while SWAN is a Diversified Portfolio fund tracking the S-Network BlackSwan Core Index. EHY is actively managed, while SWAN is passively managed. At a 0.47 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. EHY charges 0.75%/yr vs 0.49%/yr for SWAN.
Performance
EHY vs. SWAN - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, EHY achieves a -47.40% return, which is significantly lower than SWAN's 3.57% return.
EHY
- 1D
- -5.18%
- 1M
- -27.85%
- YTD
- -47.40%
- 6M
- -46.05%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
SWAN
- 1D
- 0.27%
- 1M
- -0.23%
- YTD
- 3.57%
- 6M
- 2.74%
- 1Y
- 14.39%
- 3Y*
- 12.29%
- 5Y*
- 2.94%
- 10Y*
- —
EHY vs. SWAN - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
EHY Amplify Ethereum Max Income Covered Call ETF | -47.40% | -25.56% |
SWAN Amplify BlackSwan Growth & Treasury Core ETF | 3.57% | 0.74% |
Correlation
The correlation between EHY and SWAN is 0.47, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 9, 2025 | 0.47 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
EHY vs. SWAN — Risk / Return Rank
EHY
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
SWAN
EHY vs. SWAN - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Amplify Ethereum Max Income Covered Call ETF (EHY) and Amplify BlackSwan Growth & Treasury Core ETF (SWAN). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| EHY | SWAN | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | — | 1.26 | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | — | 2.05 | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | — | 7.81 | — |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
EHY vs. SWAN - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum EHY drawdown since its inception was -60.92%, which is greater than SWAN's maximum drawdown of -31.04%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for EHY and SWAN.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| EHY | SWAN | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -60.92% | -31.04% | -29.88% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | — | -7.05% | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | — | -12.07% | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -31.04% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -60.92% | -2.16% | -58.76% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -34.87% | -8.83% | -26.04% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | — | 1.85% | — |
Volatility
EHY vs. SWAN - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| EHY | SWAN | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | — | 3.97% | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | — | 7.97% | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 60.88% | 9.97% | +50.91% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 60.88% | 11.43% | +49.45% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 60.88% | 12.49% | +48.39% |
EHY vs. SWAN - Expense Ratio Comparison
EHY has a 0.75% expense ratio, which is higher than SWAN's 0.49% expense ratio.
Dividends
EHY vs. SWAN - Dividend Comparison
EHY's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 56.77%, more than SWAN's 2.83% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
EHY Amplify Ethereum Max Income Covered Call ETF | 56.77% | 8.87% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
SWAN Amplify BlackSwan Growth & Treasury Core ETF | 2.83% | 2.86% | 2.54% | 2.98% | 2.12% | 5.04% | 1.64% | 3.69% | 0.29% |
Frequently Asked Questions
EHY and SWAN have a correlation of 0.47, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, SWAN is cheaper at 0.49% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
SWAN is cheaper with a 0.49% expense ratio, compared with 0.75% for EHY.
EHY has the higher dividend yield at 56.77%, compared with 2.83% for SWAN.
EHY is categorized as Cryptocurrency, while SWAN is Diversified Portfolio. Their fees differ too: 0.75% for EHY and 0.49% for SWAN.
Find the right allocation for EHY and SWAN
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer