EHY vs. LQTI

Last updated Jul 18, 2026

EHY (Amplify Ethereum Max Income Covered Call ETF) and LQTI (FT Vest Investment Grade & Target Income ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - EHY is a Cryptocurrency fund actively managed by Amplify, while LQTI is a Derivative Income fund actively managed by FT Vest. Both are actively managed. At a 0.20 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. EHY charges 0.75%/yr vs 0.65%/yr for LQTI.

Performance

EHY vs. LQTI - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Amplify Ethereum Max Income Covered Call ETF (EHY) and FT Vest Investment Grade & Target Income ETF (LQTI). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, EHY achieves a -40.47% return, which is significantly lower than LQTI's -0.27% return.

EHY

• 1D: -1.81%
• 1M: 1.18%
• 6M: -44.99%
• YTD: -40.47%
• 1Y: —
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

LQTI

• 1D: 0.07%
• 1M: -0.70%
• 6M: -0.35%
• YTD: -0.27%
• 1Y: 3.80%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

EHY vs. LQTI - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025
EHY Amplify Ethereum Max Income Covered Call ETF	-40.47%	-25.56%
LQTI FT Vest Investment Grade & Target Income ETF	-0.27%	0.41%

Correlation

The correlation between EHY and LQTI is 0.20, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.

	Correlation
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 9, 2025	0.20

Return for Risk

EHY vs. LQTI — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

EHY

Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

LQTI

LQTI Risk / Return Rank: 26
LQTI Sharpe Ratio Rank: 26
LQTI Sortino Ratio Rank: 24
LQTI Omega Ratio Rank: 23
LQTI Calmar Ratio Rank: 28
LQTI Martin Ratio Rank: 29

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

EHY vs. LQTI - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Amplify Ethereum Max Income Covered Call ETF (EHY) and FT Vest Investment Grade & Target Income ETF (LQTI). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	EHY	LQTI	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	—	0.74	—
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	—	1.08	—
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	—	1.13	—
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	—	1.12	—
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	—	3.15	—

Drawdowns

EHY vs. LQTI - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum EHY drawdown since its inception was -61.70%, which is greater than LQTI's maximum drawdown of -3.41%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for EHY and LQTI.

Drawdown Indicators

	EHY	LQTI	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-61.70%	-3.41%	-58.29%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	—	-3.41%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-55.77%	-1.86%	-53.91%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-36.80%	-0.92%	-35.88%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	—	1.21%	—

Volatility

Volatility by Period

	EHY	LQTI	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	—	1.41%	—
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	—	4.12%	—
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	60.38%	5.14%	+55.24%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	60.38%	5.90%	+54.48%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	60.38%	5.90%	+54.48%

EHY vs. LQTI - Expense Ratio Comparison

EHY has a 0.75% expense ratio, which is higher than LQTI's 0.65% expense ratio.

Dividends

EHY vs. LQTI - Dividend Comparison

EHY's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 56.05%, more than LQTI's 9.20% yield.

Position	TTM	2025
EHY Amplify Ethereum Max Income Covered Call ETF	56.05%	8.87%
LQTI FT Vest Investment Grade & Target Income ETF	9.20%	7.01%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both EHY and LQTI in my portfolio?

EHY and LQTI have a correlation of 0.20, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which ETF is better, EHY or LQTI?

On fees, LQTI is cheaper at 0.65% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF is cheaper, EHY or LQTI?

LQTI is cheaper with a 0.65% expense ratio, compared with 0.75% for EHY.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, EHY or LQTI?

EHY has the higher dividend yield at 56.05%, compared with 9.20% for LQTI.

What is the main difference between EHY and LQTI?

EHY is categorized as Cryptocurrency, while LQTI is Derivative Income. They also come from different issuers: Amplify and FT Vest. Their fees differ too: 0.75% for EHY and 0.65% for LQTI.