EHY vs. LQTI

Last updated Apr 2, 2026

Compare and contrast key facts about Amplify Ethereum Max Income Covered Call ETF (EHY) and FT Vest Investment Grade & Target Income ETF (LQTI).

EHY and LQTI are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. EHY is an actively managed fund by Amplify. It was launched on Oct 8, 2025. LQTI is an actively managed fund by FT Vest. It was launched on Feb 11, 2025.

Performance

EHY vs. LQTI - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Amplify Ethereum Max Income Covered Call ETF (EHY) and FT Vest Investment Grade & Target Income ETF (LQTI). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

EHY vs. LQTI - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025
EHY Amplify Ethereum Max Income Covered Call ETF	-25.41%	-25.71%
LQTI FT Vest Investment Grade & Target Income ETF	-0.44%	0.66%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, EHY achieves a -25.41% return, which is significantly lower than LQTI's -0.44% return.

EHY

• 1D: 2.24%
• 1M: 0.60%
• YTD: -25.41%
• 6M: —
• 1Y: —
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

LQTI

• 1D: 0.07%
• 1M: -1.73%
• YTD: -0.44%
• 6M: -0.03%
• 1Y: 4.56%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

EHY vs. LQTI - Expense Ratio Comparison

EHY has a 0.75% expense ratio, which is higher than LQTI's 0.65% expense ratio.

EHY

Amplify Ethereum Max Income Covered Call ETF

LQTI

FT Vest Investment Grade & Target Income ETF

Return for Risk

EHY vs. LQTI — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

LQTI

LQTI Risk / Return Rank: 36
LQTI Sharpe Ratio Rank: 36
LQTI Sortino Ratio Rank: 32
LQTI Omega Ratio Rank: 30
LQTI Calmar Ratio Rank: 45
LQTI Martin Ratio Rank: 37

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

EHY vs. LQTI - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Amplify Ethereum Max Income Covered Call ETF (EHY) and FT Vest Investment Grade & Target Income ETF (LQTI). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	EHY	LQTI	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	—	0.74	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	-1.14	0.90	-2.04

Correlation

The correlation between EHY and LQTI is 0.17, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.

Dividends

EHY vs. LQTI - Dividend Comparison

EHY's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 28.33%, more than LQTI's 9.07% yield.

	TTM	2025
EHY Amplify Ethereum Max Income Covered Call ETF	28.33%	8.87%
LQTI FT Vest Investment Grade & Target Income ETF	9.07%	7.01%

Drawdowns

EHY vs. LQTI - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum EHY drawdown since its inception was -51.48%, which is greater than LQTI's maximum drawdown of -3.41%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for EHY and LQTI.

Drawdown Indicators

	EHY	LQTI	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-51.48%	-3.41%	-48.07%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	—	-3.41%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-44.58%	-2.03%	-42.55%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-30.01%	-0.78%	-29.23%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	—	1.12%	—

Volatility

Volatility by Period

	EHY	LQTI	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	—	2.66%	—
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	—	3.87%	—
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	63.09%	6.23%	+56.86%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	63.09%	6.11%	+56.98%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	63.09%	6.11%	+56.98%