EHLS vs. JPO
EHLS (Even Herd Long Short ETF) and JPO (YieldMax JPM Option Income Strategy ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - EHLS is a Long-Short fund actively managed by Tidal, while JPO is a Options Trading fund actively managed by Tidal. Both are actively managed. Over the past year, EHLS returned 16.88% vs 19.08% for JPO. Their 0.37 correlation means their historical movements had little consistent relationship. EHLS charges 1.58%/yr vs 1.19%/yr for JPO.
Performance
EHLS vs. JPO - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, EHLS achieves a 10.15% return, which is significantly higher than JPO's 8.98% return.
EHLS
- 1D
- 0.55%
- 1M
- -2.28%
- 6M
- 2.88%
- YTD
- 10.15%
- 1Y
- 16.88%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
- ALL TIME*
- 12.66%
JPO
- 1D
- 0.34%
- 1M
- 5.47%
- 6M
- 14.60%
- YTD
- 8.98%
- 1Y
- 19.08%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
- ALL TIME*
- 17.53%
Liquidity Comparison
| Position | Avg. Volume Value (2W) | Avg. Volume Value (1M) | Avg. Volume Value (3M) |
|---|---|---|---|
| $13.47K | $14.20K | $68.98K | |
| $418.56K | $404.33K | $336.84K |
EHLS vs. JPO - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | |
|---|---|---|---|
EHLS Even Herd Long Short ETF | 10.15% | 6.67% | 12.31% |
JPO YieldMax JPM Option Income Strategy ETF | 8.98% | 22.26% | -0.17% |
Correlation
The correlation between EHLS and JPO is 0.37, which is low. Their historical price movements had little consistent relationship.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most. | 0.37 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 2, 2024 | 0.37 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
EHLS vs. JPO — Risk / Return Rank
EHLS
JPO
EHLS vs. JPO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Even Herd Long Short ETF (EHLS) and YieldMax JPM Option Income Strategy ETF (JPO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| EHLS | JPO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.07 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.06 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.15 | 1.16 | -0.01 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.72 | 1.21 | +0.52 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 4.40 | 3.00 | +1.40 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
EHLS vs. JPO - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum EHLS drawdown since its inception was -18.96%, smaller than the maximum JPO drawdown of -24.80%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for EHLS and JPO.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| EHLS | JPO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -18.96% | -24.80% | +5.84% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -9.06% | -14.24% | +5.18% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -6.17% | -1.04% | -5.13% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -4.42% | -4.42% | 0.00% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 3.54% | 5.72% | -2.18% |
Volatility
EHLS vs. JPO - Volatility Comparison
Even Herd Long Short ETF (EHLS) and YieldMax JPM Option Income Strategy ETF (JPO) have volatilities of 5.04% and 5.21%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| EHLS | JPO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 5.04% | 5.21% | -0.17% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 14.84% | 14.08% | +0.76% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 19.19% | 19.41% | -0.22% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 19.56% | 19.06% | +0.50% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 19.56% | 19.06% | +0.50% |
EHLS vs. JPO - Expense Ratio Comparison
EHLS has a 1.58% expense ratio, which is higher than JPO's 1.19% expense ratio.
Dividends
EHLS vs. JPO - Dividend Comparison
EHLS has not paid dividends to shareholders, while JPO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 31.81%.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
EHLS Even Herd Long Short ETF | 0.00% | 0.00% | 1.03% | 0.00% |
JPO YieldMax JPM Option Income Strategy ETF | 31.81% | 34.13% | 25.15% | 4.84% |
Frequently Asked Questions
EHLS and JPO have a correlation of 0.37, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
JPO has higher volatility (5.21%) compared to EHLS (5.04%). In terms of maximum drawdown, EHLS dropped -18.96% vs JPO's -24.80%.
On 1-year performance, JPO leads with 19.08% vs 16.88% for EHLS. On fees, JPO is cheaper at 1.19% per year. On volatility, EHLS has been the lower-risk option at 5.04%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 1-year period, JPO has performed better with a 19.08% return vs 16.88%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
JPO is cheaper with a 1.19% expense ratio, compared with 1.58% for EHLS.
JPO has the higher dividend yield at 31.81%, compared with 0.00% for EHLS.
EHLS is categorized as Long-Short, while JPO is Options Trading. Their fees differ too: 1.58% for EHLS and 1.19% for JPO.
JPO currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.89 vs 0.81), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for EHLS and JPO
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer