PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
EHE.TO vs. QXM.TO
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

EHE.TO vs. QXM.TO - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a CA$10,000 investment in CI Europe Hedged Equity Index ETF (EHE.TO) and CI Morningstar National Bank Québec Index ETF (QXM.TO). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, EHE.TO achieves a 7.01% return, which is significantly higher than QXM.TO's 5.72% return. Over the past 10 years, EHE.TO has underperformed QXM.TO with an annualized return of 9.43%, while QXM.TO has yielded a comparatively higher 10.29% annualized return.


EHE.TO

1D
0.43%
1M
-0.71%
6M
3.00%
YTD
7.01%
1Y
16.75%
3Y*
12.56%
5Y*
9.69%
10Y*
9.43%

QXM.TO

1D
0.02%
1M
0.17%
6M
2.02%
YTD
5.72%
1Y
19.05%
3Y*
16.63%
5Y*
10.66%
10Y*
10.29%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

EHE.TO vs. QXM.TO - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
EHE.TO
CI Europe Hedged Equity Index ETF
7.01%22.91%4.19%22.26%-10.45%23.79%-5.96%24.49%-10.68%15.40%
QXM.TO
CI Morningstar National Bank Québec Index ETF
5.72%23.46%20.08%13.24%-6.91%16.60%1.63%24.81%-9.15%15.66%

Correlation

The correlation between EHE.TO and QXM.TO is 0.18, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.18

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.20

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.22

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.26

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 15, 2016

0.26

EHE.TO vs. QXM.TO - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
EHE.TO
QXM.TO

Industrials

22.6%
32.6%

Financial Services

15.1%
17.3%

Consumer Cyclical

13.5%
11.6%

Consumer Defensive

12.4%
12.4%

Technology

12.1%
5.2%

Healthcare

8.1%
0.9%

Basic Materials

6.8%
10.2%

Communication Services

5.6%
8.5%

Energy

3.7%

-

Real Estate

-

0.2%

Utilities

-

1.2%

Industrials

EHE.TO
22.6%
QXM.TO
32.6%

Financial Services

EHE.TO
15.1%
QXM.TO
17.3%

Consumer Cyclical

EHE.TO
13.5%
QXM.TO
11.6%

Consumer Defensive

EHE.TO
12.4%
QXM.TO
12.4%

Technology

EHE.TO
12.1%
QXM.TO
5.2%

Healthcare

EHE.TO
8.1%
QXM.TO
0.9%

Basic Materials

EHE.TO
6.8%
QXM.TO
10.2%

Communication Services

EHE.TO
5.6%
QXM.TO
8.5%

Energy

EHE.TO
3.7%
QXM.TO

-

Real Estate

EHE.TO

-

QXM.TO
0.2%

Utilities

EHE.TO

-

QXM.TO
1.2%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

EHE.TO vs. QXM.TO — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

EHE.TO
EHE.TO Risk / Return Rank: 3939
Overall Rank
EHE.TO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3838
Sharpe Ratio Rank
EHE.TO Sortino Ratio Rank: 3838
Sortino Ratio Rank
EHE.TO Omega Ratio Rank: 4040
Omega Ratio Rank
EHE.TO Calmar Ratio Rank: 3636
Calmar Ratio Rank
EHE.TO Martin Ratio Rank: 4444
Martin Ratio Rank

QXM.TO
QXM.TO Risk / Return Rank: 5959
Overall Rank
QXM.TO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5858
Sharpe Ratio Rank
QXM.TO Sortino Ratio Rank: 6161
Sortino Ratio Rank
QXM.TO Omega Ratio Rank: 6060
Omega Ratio Rank
QXM.TO Calmar Ratio Rank: 5757
Calmar Ratio Rank
QXM.TO Martin Ratio Rank: 6161
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

EHE.TO vs. QXM.TO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for CI Europe Hedged Equity Index ETF (EHE.TO) and CI Morningstar National Bank Québec Index ETF (QXM.TO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


EHE.TOQXM.TODifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.41

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.59

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.20

1.28

-0.07

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.43

2.17

-0.73

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

5.41

7.97

-2.57

EHE.TO vs. QXM.TO - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current EHE.TO Sharpe Ratio is 1.05, which is comparable to the QXM.TO Sharpe Ratio of 1.46. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of EHE.TO and QXM.TO, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

EHE.TO vs. QXM.TO - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum EHE.TO drawdown since its inception was -38.20%, smaller than the maximum QXM.TO drawdown of -40.65%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for EHE.TO and QXM.TO.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


EHE.TOQXM.TODifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-38.20%

-40.65%

+2.45%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-11.85%

-9.38%

-2.47%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-16.30%

-15.72%

-0.58%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-22.91%

-23.01%

+0.10%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-38.20%

-40.65%

+2.45%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-2.13%

-1.70%

-0.43%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-5.30%

-4.18%

-1.12%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.14%

2.55%

+0.59%

Volatility

EHE.TO vs. QXM.TO - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for CI Europe Hedged Equity Index ETF (EHE.TO) is 3.23%, while CI Morningstar National Bank Québec Index ETF (QXM.TO) has a volatility of 5.73%. This indicates that EHE.TO experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than QXM.TO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


EHE.TOQXM.TODifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.23%

5.73%

-2.50%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

13.45%

12.25%

+1.20%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

16.11%

13.91%

+2.20%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

18.12%

14.01%

+4.11%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

17.42%

15.71%

+1.71%

Dividends

EHE.TO vs. QXM.TO - Dividend Comparison

EHE.TO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.17%, more than QXM.TO's 1.01% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
EHE.TO
CI Europe Hedged Equity Index ETF
2.17%2.16%4.38%3.30%2.19%1.90%2.55%2.02%2.08%1.37%0.13%0.00%
QXM.TO
CI Morningstar National Bank Québec Index ETF
1.01%1.17%1.27%1.39%1.51%1.02%1.27%1.39%1.65%1.36%1.56%1.52%

Frequently Asked Questions


EHE.TO and QXM.TO have a correlation of 0.18, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

EHE.TO is categorized as Europe Equities, while QXM.TO is Canada Equities.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for EHE.TO and QXM.TO

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer