EHBA.DE vs. IS3B.DE
EHBA.DE (Invesco Euro Corporate Hybrid Bond UCITS ETF Acc) and IS3B.DE (iShares Euro Corporate Bond Financials UCITS ETF) are both European Corporate Bonds funds - EHBA.DE tracks the Bloomberg Euro Universal Corporate ex Financials Hybrid Capital Securities 8% Capped Bond Index while IS3B.DE tracks the Bloomberg Euro Aggregate Financial. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, EHBA.DE returned 1.70%/yr vs 0.29%/yr for IS3B.DE. At a 0.47 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. EHBA.DE charges 0.39%/yr vs 0.20%/yr for IS3B.DE.
Performance
EHBA.DE vs. IS3B.DE - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, EHBA.DE achieves a 0.88% return, which is significantly higher than IS3B.DE's 0.33% return.
EHBA.DE
- 1D
- -0.04%
- 1M
- -0.22%
- 6M
- 0.24%
- YTD
- 0.88%
- 1Y
- 2.83%
- 3Y*
- 7.84%
- 5Y*
- 1.70%
- 10Y*
- —
IS3B.DE
- 1D
- -0.05%
- 1M
- -0.42%
- 6M
- -0.07%
- YTD
- 0.33%
- 1Y
- 1.33%
- 3Y*
- 4.82%
- 5Y*
- 0.29%
- 10Y*
- 1.11%
EHBA.DE vs. IS3B.DE - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
EHBA.DE Invesco Euro Corporate Hybrid Bond UCITS ETF Acc | 0.88% | 5.24% | 10.78% | 9.40% | -14.85% | 1.16% | 3.63% |
IS3B.DE iShares Euro Corporate Bond Financials UCITS ETF | 0.33% | 3.53% | 5.28% | 7.82% | -13.13% | -0.74% | 1.86% |
Correlation
The correlation between EHBA.DE and IS3B.DE is 0.40, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.40 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.44 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.49 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 17, 2020 | 0.47 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
EHBA.DE vs. IS3B.DE — Risk / Return Rank
EHBA.DE
IS3B.DE
EHBA.DE vs. IS3B.DE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Invesco Euro Corporate Hybrid Bond UCITS ETF Acc (EHBA.DE) and iShares Euro Corporate Bond Financials UCITS ETF (IS3B.DE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| EHBA.DE | IS3B.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.29 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +0.43 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.13 | 1.08 | +0.05 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 0.76 | 0.49 | +0.27 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 2.66 | 1.69 | +0.97 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
EHBA.DE vs. IS3B.DE - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum EHBA.DE drawdown since its inception was -20.61%, which is greater than IS3B.DE's maximum drawdown of -17.05%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for EHBA.DE and IS3B.DE.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| EHBA.DE | IS3B.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -20.61% | -17.05% | -3.56% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -3.72% | -2.70% | -1.02% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -3.72% | -2.70% | -1.02% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -20.61% | -17.05% | -3.56% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -17.05% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -1.06% | -0.89% | -0.17% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -5.49% | -2.92% | -2.57% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 1.06% | 0.78% | +0.28% |
Volatility
EHBA.DE vs. IS3B.DE - Volatility Comparison
Invesco Euro Corporate Hybrid Bond UCITS ETF Acc (EHBA.DE) has a higher volatility of 1.07% compared to iShares Euro Corporate Bond Financials UCITS ETF (IS3B.DE) at 0.72%. This indicates that EHBA.DE's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than IS3B.DE based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| EHBA.DE | IS3B.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 1.07% | 0.72% | +0.35% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 3.68% | 3.17% | +0.51% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 4.20% | 3.48% | +0.72% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 5.04% | 4.19% | +0.85% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 4.82% | 4.36% | +0.46% |
EHBA.DE vs. IS3B.DE - Expense Ratio Comparison
EHBA.DE has a 0.39% expense ratio, which is higher than IS3B.DE's 0.20% expense ratio.
Dividends
EHBA.DE vs. IS3B.DE - Dividend Comparison
EHBA.DE has not paid dividends to shareholders, while IS3B.DE's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.19%.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
EHBA.DE Invesco Euro Corporate Hybrid Bond UCITS ETF Acc | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
IS3B.DE iShares Euro Corporate Bond Financials UCITS ETF | 3.19% | 3.08% | 2.95% | 2.42% | 1.00% | 0.75% | 0.97% | 1.09% | 1.10% | 1.12% | 1.52% | 1.70% |
Frequently Asked Questions
EHBA.DE and IS3B.DE have a correlation of 0.40, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, IS3B.DE is cheaper at 0.20% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
IS3B.DE is cheaper with a 0.20% expense ratio, compared with 0.39% for EHBA.DE.
EHBA.DE tracks Bloomberg Euro Universal Corporate ex Financials Hybrid Capital Securities 8% Capped Bond Index, while IS3B.DE tracks Bloomberg Euro Aggregate Financial. They also come from different issuers: Invesco and iShares. Their fees differ too: 0.39% for EHBA.DE and 0.20% for IS3B.DE.
Find the right allocation for EHBA.DE and IS3B.DE
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer