EHBA.DE vs. IG35.DE

Last updated Jul 4, 2026

EHBA.DE (Invesco Euro Corporate Hybrid Bond UCITS ETF Acc) and IG35.DE (iShares iBonds December 2035 Term EUR Corporate UCITS ETF (Acc)) are both European Corporate Bonds funds - EHBA.DE tracks the Bloomberg Euro Universal Corporate ex Financials Hybrid Capital Securities 8% Capped Bond Index while IG35.DE tracks the Bloomberg MSCI December 2035 Maturity EUR Corporate ESG Screened Index. Both are passively managed. At a 0.47 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. EHBA.DE charges 0.39%/yr vs 0.12%/yr for IG35.DE.

Performance

EHBA.DE vs. IG35.DE - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a €10,000 investment in Invesco Euro Corporate Hybrid Bond UCITS ETF Acc (EHBA.DE) and iShares iBonds December 2035 Term EUR Corporate UCITS ETF (Acc) (IG35.DE). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

The year-to-date returns for both stocks are quite close, with EHBA.DE having a 1.67% return and IG35.DE slightly lower at 1.65%.

EHBA.DE

• 1D: 0.09%
• 1M: 0.76%
• 6M: 1.90%
• YTD: 1.67%
• 1Y: 3.82%
• 3Y*: 8.32%
• 5Y*: 1.96%
• 10Y*: —

IG35.DE

• 1D: 0.00%
• 1M: 1.00%
• 6M: 1.78%
• YTD: 1.65%
• 1Y: —
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

EHBA.DE vs. IG35.DE - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025
EHBA.DE Invesco Euro Corporate Hybrid Bond UCITS ETF Acc	1.67%	0.13%
IG35.DE iShares iBonds December 2035 Term EUR Corporate UCITS ETF (Acc)	1.65%	0.06%

Correlation

The correlation between EHBA.DE and IG35.DE is 0.47, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.

	Correlation
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 8, 2025	0.47

Return for Risk

EHBA.DE vs. IG35.DE — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

EHBA.DE

EHBA.DE Risk / Return Rank: 28
EHBA.DE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 28
EHBA.DE Sortino Ratio Rank: 28
EHBA.DE Omega Ratio Rank: 29
EHBA.DE Calmar Ratio Rank: 24
EHBA.DE Martin Ratio Rank: 30

IG35.DE

Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

EHBA.DE vs. IG35.DE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Invesco Euro Corporate Hybrid Bond UCITS ETF Acc (EHBA.DE) and iShares iBonds December 2035 Term EUR Corporate UCITS ETF (Acc) (IG35.DE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	EHBA.DE	IG35.DE	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	0.91	—	—
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	1.36	—	—
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.18	—	—
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	1.02	—	—
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	3.64	—	—

Drawdowns

EHBA.DE vs. IG35.DE - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum EHBA.DE drawdown since its inception was -20.61%, which is greater than IG35.DE's maximum drawdown of -4.08%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for EHBA.DE and IG35.DE.

Drawdown Indicators

	EHBA.DE	IG35.DE	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-20.61%	-4.08%	-16.53%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-3.72%	—	—
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-3.72%	—	—
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-20.61%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-0.28%	-0.37%	+0.09%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-5.52%	-1.10%	-4.42%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	1.05%	—	—

Volatility

Volatility by Period

	EHBA.DE	IG35.DE	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	1.12%	—	—
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	3.66%	—	—
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	4.16%	5.31%	-1.15%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	5.03%	5.31%	-0.28%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	4.83%	5.31%	-0.48%

EHBA.DE vs. IG35.DE - Expense Ratio Comparison

EHBA.DE has a 0.39% expense ratio, which is higher than IG35.DE's 0.12% expense ratio.

Dividends

EHBA.DE vs. IG35.DE - Dividend Comparison

Neither EHBA.DE nor IG35.DE has paid dividends to shareholders.

Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both EHBA.DE and IG35.DE in my portfolio?

EHBA.DE and IG35.DE have a correlation of 0.47, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which ETF is better, EHBA.DE or IG35.DE?

On fees, IG35.DE is cheaper at 0.12% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF is cheaper, EHBA.DE or IG35.DE?

IG35.DE is cheaper with a 0.12% expense ratio, compared with 0.39% for EHBA.DE.

What is the main difference between EHBA.DE and IG35.DE?

EHBA.DE tracks Bloomberg Euro Universal Corporate ex Financials Hybrid Capital Securities 8% Capped Bond Index, while IG35.DE tracks Bloomberg MSCI December 2035 Maturity EUR Corporate ESG Screened Index. They also come from different issuers: Invesco and iShares. Their fees differ too: 0.39% for EHBA.DE and 0.12% for IG35.DE.