PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
EGOG.L vs. AEGG.L
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

EGOG.L vs. AEGG.L - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a £10,000 investment in UBS ETF (LU) J.P. Morgan Global Government ESG Liquid Bond UCITS ETF (hedged to GBP) A-dis (EGOG.L) and iShares Global Aggregate Bond ESG UCITS ETF GBP Hedged (Acc) (AEGG.L). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Different Trading Currencies

EGOG.L is traded in GBp, while AEGG.L is traded in GBP. To make them comparable, the AEGG.L values have been converted to GBp using the latest available exchange rates.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, EGOG.L achieves a -0.03% return, which is significantly lower than AEGG.L's 0.49% return.


EGOG.L

1D
0.04%
1M
0.37%
YTD
-0.03%
6M
-0.16%
1Y
1.76%
3Y*
2.65%
5Y*
-0.75%
10Y*

AEGG.L

1D
0.12%
1M
0.30%
YTD
0.49%
6M
0.59%
1Y
3.19%
3Y*
3.84%
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

EGOG.L vs. AEGG.L - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024202320222021
EGOG.L
UBS ETF (LU) J.P. Morgan Global Government ESG Liquid Bond UCITS ETF (hedged to GBP) A-dis
-0.03%3.06%2.00%3.46%-13.02%0.31%
AEGG.L
iShares Global Aggregate Bond ESG UCITS ETF GBP Hedged (Acc)
0.49%4.36%3.07%5.65%-12.74%-0.69%

Correlation

The correlation between EGOG.L and AEGG.L is 0.59, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.59

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.40

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 8, 2021

0.34

Over the past year, EGOG.L and AEGG.L have become more correlated (0.59) than their long-term average of 0.34, meaning their price movements have been converging.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

EGOG.L vs. AEGG.L — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

EGOG.L
EGOG.L Risk / Return Rank: 2121
Overall Rank
EGOG.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2222
Sharpe Ratio Rank
EGOG.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 2222
Sortino Ratio Rank
EGOG.L Omega Ratio Rank: 2020
Omega Ratio Rank
EGOG.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 2222
Calmar Ratio Rank
EGOG.L Martin Ratio Rank: 2020
Martin Ratio Rank

AEGG.L
AEGG.L Risk / Return Rank: 2828
Overall Rank
AEGG.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2929
Sharpe Ratio Rank
AEGG.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 2929
Sortino Ratio Rank
AEGG.L Omega Ratio Rank: 2727
Omega Ratio Rank
AEGG.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 2828
Calmar Ratio Rank
AEGG.L Martin Ratio Rank: 2828
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

EGOG.L vs. AEGG.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for UBS ETF (LU) J.P. Morgan Global Government ESG Liquid Bond UCITS ETF (hedged to GBP) A-dis (EGOG.L) and iShares Global Aggregate Bond ESG UCITS ETF GBP Hedged (Acc) (AEGG.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


EGOG.LAEGG.LDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.28

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.44

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.12

1.18

-0.06

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

0.96

1.33

-0.37

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

2.28

3.82

-1.55

EGOG.L vs. AEGG.L - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current EGOG.L Sharpe Ratio is 0.73, which is comparable to the AEGG.L Sharpe Ratio of 1.01. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of EGOG.L and AEGG.L, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


EGOG.LAEGG.LDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.73

1.01

-0.28

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

-0.26

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

-0.48

-0.05

-0.43

Drawdowns

EGOG.L vs. AEGG.L - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum EGOG.L drawdown since its inception was -16.69%, which is greater than AEGG.L's maximum drawdown of -15.75%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for EGOG.L and AEGG.L.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


EGOG.LAEGG.LDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-16.69%

-15.75%

-0.94%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-3.05%

-2.38%

-0.67%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-3.48%

-3.72%

+0.24%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-15.73%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-7.30%

-1.36%

-5.94%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-8.24%

-7.54%

-0.70%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.22%

0.83%

+0.39%

Volatility

EGOG.L vs. AEGG.L - Volatility Comparison

UBS ETF (LU) J.P. Morgan Global Government ESG Liquid Bond UCITS ETF (hedged to GBP) A-dis (EGOG.L) has a higher volatility of 1.57% compared to iShares Global Aggregate Bond ESG UCITS ETF GBP Hedged (Acc) (AEGG.L) at 1.42%. This indicates that EGOG.L's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than AEGG.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


EGOG.LAEGG.LDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

1.57%

1.42%

+0.15%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

2.89%

2.48%

+0.41%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

4.00%

3.13%

+0.87%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

8.63%

4.59%

+4.04%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

8.62%

4.59%

+4.03%

EGOG.L vs. AEGG.L - Expense Ratio Comparison

EGOG.L has a 0.20% expense ratio, which is higher than AEGG.L's 0.10% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

EGOG.L vs. AEGG.L - Dividend Comparison

EGOG.L's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.71%, while AEGG.L has not paid dividends to shareholders.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021
AEGG.L
iShares Global Aggregate Bond ESG UCITS ETF GBP Hedged (Acc)
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
EGOG.L
UBS ETF (LU) J.P. Morgan Global Government ESG Liquid Bond UCITS ETF (hedged to GBP) A-dis
2.71%2.91%2.30%1.44%0.44%0.17%

Frequently Asked Questions


EGOG.L and AEGG.L have a correlation of 0.59, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, AEGG.L is cheaper at 0.10% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

AEGG.L is cheaper with a 0.10% expense ratio, compared with 0.20% for EGOG.L.

Both ETFs track Bloomberg Global Aggregate TR Hdg GBP. They also come from different issuers: UBS and iShares. Their fees differ too: 0.20% for EGOG.L and 0.10% for AEGG.L.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for EGOG.L and AEGG.L

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer