EGGY vs. BAMU
EGGY (NestYield Dynamic Income ETF) and BAMU (Brookstone Ultra-Short Bond ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - EGGY is a Derivative Income fund actively managed by NestYield, while BAMU is a Ultrashort Bond fund actively managed by Brookstone. Both are actively managed. Over the past year, EGGY returned 62.65% vs 2.91% for BAMU. At a correlation of -0.02, they often move in opposite directions. EGGY charges 0.95%/yr vs 1.09%/yr for BAMU.
Performance
EGGY vs. BAMU - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, EGGY achieves a 50.49% return, which is significantly higher than BAMU's 1.18% return.
EGGY
- 1D
- 3.47%
- 1M
- 17.02%
- YTD
- 50.49%
- 6M
- 48.12%
- 1Y
- 62.65%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
BAMU
- 1D
- 0.02%
- 1M
- 0.16%
- YTD
- 1.18%
- 6M
- 1.23%
- 1Y
- 2.91%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
EGGY vs. BAMU - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | |
|---|---|---|---|
EGGY NestYield Dynamic Income ETF | 50.49% | 16.46% | -0.91% |
BAMU Brookstone Ultra-Short Bond ETF | 1.18% | 3.21% | 0.01% |
Correlation
The correlation between EGGY and BAMU is -0.14, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.14 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 27, 2024 | -0.02 |
The correlation between EGGY and BAMU shifts across timeframes, from -0.14 (1 year) to -0.02 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
EGGY vs. BAMU — Risk / Return Rank
EGGY
BAMU
EGGY vs. BAMU - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for NestYield Dynamic Income ETF (EGGY) and Brookstone Ultra-Short Bond ETF (BAMU). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| EGGY | BAMU | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -3.01 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -6.43 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.35 | 2.43 | -1.08 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 3.43 | 24.72 | -21.29 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 8.52 | 97.90 | -89.38 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
EGGY vs. BAMU - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum EGGY drawdown since its inception was -18.34%, which is greater than BAMU's maximum drawdown of -0.36%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for EGGY and BAMU.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| EGGY | BAMU | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -18.34% | -0.36% | -17.98% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -18.34% | -0.12% | -18.22% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -5.22% | -0.02% | -5.20% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 7.38% | 0.03% | +7.35% |
Volatility
EGGY vs. BAMU - Volatility Comparison
NestYield Dynamic Income ETF (EGGY) has a higher volatility of 14.36% compared to Brookstone Ultra-Short Bond ETF (BAMU) at 0.09%. This indicates that EGGY's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than BAMU based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| EGGY | BAMU | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 14.36% | 0.09% | +14.27% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 26.34% | 0.40% | +25.94% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 31.63% | 0.58% | +31.05% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 30.04% | 0.87% | +29.17% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 30.04% | 0.87% | +29.17% |
EGGY vs. BAMU - Expense Ratio Comparison
EGGY has a 0.95% expense ratio, which is lower than BAMU's 1.09% expense ratio.
Dividends
EGGY vs. BAMU - Dividend Comparison
EGGY's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 23.71%, more than BAMU's 3.05% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
BAMU Brookstone Ultra-Short Bond ETF | 3.05% | 3.20% | 3.97% | 0.84% |
EGGY NestYield Dynamic Income ETF | 23.71% | 28.26% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
EGGY and BAMU have a correlation of -0.14, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
EGGY has higher volatility (14.36%) compared to BAMU (0.09%). In terms of maximum drawdown, EGGY dropped -18.34% vs BAMU's -0.36%.
On 1-year performance, EGGY leads with 62.65% vs 2.91% for BAMU. On fees, EGGY is cheaper at 0.95% per year. On volatility, BAMU has been the lower-risk option at 0.09%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 1-year period, EGGY has performed better with a 62.65% return vs 2.91%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
EGGY is cheaper with a 0.95% expense ratio, compared with 1.09% for BAMU.
EGGY has the higher dividend yield at 23.71%, compared with 3.05% for BAMU.
EGGY is categorized as Derivative Income, while BAMU is Ultrashort Bond. They also come from different issuers: NestYield and Brookstone. Their fees differ too: 0.95% for EGGY and 1.09% for BAMU.
BAMU currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (5.01 vs 1.99), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for EGGY and BAMU
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer