EGGS vs. OMAH

Last updated Jun 3, 2026

EGGS (NestYield Total Return Guard ETF) and OMAH (VistaShares Target 15™ Berkshire Select Income ETF) are both Derivative Income funds. Both are actively managed. Over the past year, EGGS returned 28.00% vs 12.64% for OMAH. At a 0.21 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. EGGS charges 0.89%/yr vs 0.95%/yr for OMAH.

Performance

EGGS vs. OMAH - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in NestYield Total Return Guard ETF (EGGS) and VistaShares Target 15™ Berkshire Select Income ETF (OMAH). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, EGGS achieves a 17.56% return, which is significantly higher than OMAH's 5.30% return.

EGGS

• 1D: 3.68%
• 1M: 10.44%
• YTD: 17.56%
• 6M: 15.63%
• 1Y: 28.00%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

OMAH

• 1D: -0.32%
• 1M: 0.99%
• YTD: 5.30%
• 6M: 5.17%
• 1Y: 12.64%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

EGGS vs. OMAH - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025
EGGS NestYield Total Return Guard ETF	17.56%	18.48%
OMAH VistaShares Target 15™ Berkshire Select Income ETF	5.30%	6.74%

Correlation

The correlation between EGGS and OMAH is 0.06, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.06
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 6, 2025	0.21

The correlation between EGGS and OMAH shifts across timeframes, from 0.06 (1 year) to 0.21 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Return for Risk

EGGS vs. OMAH — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

EGGS

EGGS Risk / Return Rank: 31
EGGS Sharpe Ratio Rank: 33
EGGS Sortino Ratio Rank: 31
EGGS Omega Ratio Rank: 34
EGGS Calmar Ratio Rank: 32
EGGS Martin Ratio Rank: 26

OMAH

OMAH Risk / Return Rank: 54
OMAH Sharpe Ratio Rank: 45
OMAH Sortino Ratio Rank: 44
OMAH Omega Ratio Rank: 44
OMAH Calmar Ratio Rank: 80
OMAH Martin Ratio Rank: 59

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

EGGS vs. OMAH - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for NestYield Total Return Guard ETF (EGGS) and VistaShares Target 15™ Berkshire Select Income ETF (OMAH). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	EGGS	OMAH	Difference
Sharpe ratio Return per unit of total volatility	1.21	1.58	-0.37
Sortino ratio Return per unit of downside risk	1.65	2.23	-0.58
Omega ratio Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.23	1.28	-0.05
Calmar ratio Return relative to maximum drawdown	1.63	4.21	-2.58
Martin ratio Return relative to average drawdown	3.71	10.55	-6.83
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

EGGS vs. OMAH - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current EGGS Sharpe Ratio is 1.21, which is comparable to the OMAH Sharpe Ratio of 1.58. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of EGGS and OMAH, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	EGGS	OMAH	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	1.21	1.58	-0.37
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.89	0.75	+0.14

Drawdowns

EGGS vs. OMAH - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum EGGS drawdown since its inception was -18.52%, which is greater than OMAH's maximum drawdown of -11.83%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for EGGS and OMAH.

Drawdown Indicators

	EGGS	OMAH	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-18.52%	-11.83%	-6.69%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-18.17%	-3.00%	-15.17%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	0.00%	-1.97%	+1.97%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-5.87%	-1.25%	-4.62%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	7.96%	1.20%	+6.76%

Volatility

EGGS vs. OMAH - Volatility Comparison

NestYield Total Return Guard ETF (EGGS) has a higher volatility of 8.87% compared to VistaShares Target 15™ Berkshire Select Income ETF (OMAH) at 1.79%. This indicates that EGGS's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than OMAH based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	EGGS	OMAH	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	8.87%	1.79%	+7.08%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	19.12%	5.44%	+13.68%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	23.31%	8.02%	+15.29%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	24.41%	13.22%	+11.19%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	24.41%	13.22%	+11.19%

EGGS vs. OMAH - Expense Ratio Comparison

EGGS has a 0.89% expense ratio, which is lower than OMAH's 0.95% expense ratio.

Dividends

EGGS vs. OMAH - Dividend Comparison

EGGS's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 15.44%, which matches OMAH's 15.33% yield.

Position	TTM	2025
EGGS NestYield Total Return Guard ETF	15.44%	14.52%
OMAH VistaShares Target 15™ Berkshire Select Income ETF	15.33%	12.86%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both EGGS and OMAH in my portfolio?

EGGS and OMAH have a correlation of 0.06, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, EGGS or OMAH?

EGGS has higher volatility (8.87%) compared to OMAH (1.79%). In terms of maximum drawdown, EGGS dropped -18.52% vs OMAH's -11.83%.

Which ETF is better, EGGS or OMAH?

On 1-year performance, EGGS leads with 28.00% vs 12.64% for OMAH. On fees, EGGS is cheaper at 0.89% per year. On volatility, OMAH has been the lower-risk option at 1.79%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, EGGS or OMAH?

Over the 1-year period, EGGS has performed better with a 28.00% return vs 12.64%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, EGGS or OMAH?

EGGS is cheaper with a 0.89% expense ratio, compared with 0.95% for OMAH.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, EGGS or OMAH?

EGGS has the higher dividend yield at 15.44%, compared with 15.33% for OMAH.

What is the main difference between EGGS and OMAH?

They also come from different issuers: NestYield and VistaShares. Their fees differ too: 0.89% for EGGS and 0.95% for OMAH.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

OMAH currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.58 vs 1.21), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.