PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
EGGS vs. IVVW
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

EGGS vs. IVVW - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in NestYield Total Return Guard ETF (EGGS) and iShares S&P 500 BuyWrite ETF (IVVW). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, EGGS achieves a 23.37% return, which is significantly higher than IVVW's 4.01% return.


EGGS

1D
-2.26%
1M
9.06%
YTD
23.37%
6M
21.02%
1Y
32.43%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

IVVW

1D
-1.24%
1M
0.16%
YTD
4.01%
6M
4.08%
1Y
17.28%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

EGGS vs. IVVW - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024
EGGS
NestYield Total Return Guard ETF
23.37%14.41%-1.62%
IVVW
iShares S&P 500 BuyWrite ETF
4.01%11.71%-0.86%

Correlation

The correlation between EGGS and IVVW is 0.56, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.56

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 27, 2024

0.64

The correlation between EGGS and IVVW has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.56 to 0.64 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

EGGS vs. IVVW — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

EGGS
EGGS Risk / Return Rank: 3636
Overall Rank
EGGS Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3939
Sharpe Ratio Rank
EGGS Sortino Ratio Rank: 3636
Sortino Ratio Rank
EGGS Omega Ratio Rank: 3939
Omega Ratio Rank
EGGS Calmar Ratio Rank: 3838
Calmar Ratio Rank
EGGS Martin Ratio Rank: 3030
Martin Ratio Rank

IVVW
IVVW Risk / Return Rank: 7373
Overall Rank
IVVW Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7171
Sharpe Ratio Rank
IVVW Sortino Ratio Rank: 6969
Sortino Ratio Rank
IVVW Omega Ratio Rank: 8383
Omega Ratio Rank
IVVW Calmar Ratio Rank: 6363
Calmar Ratio Rank
IVVW Martin Ratio Rank: 8383
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

EGGS vs. IVVW - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for NestYield Total Return Guard ETF (EGGS) and iShares S&P 500 BuyWrite ETF (IVVW). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


EGGSIVVWDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.86

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-1.17

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.25

1.47

-0.22

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.79

2.99

-1.19

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

4.07

15.95

-11.88

EGGS vs. IVVW - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current EGGS Sharpe Ratio is 1.30, which is lower than the IVVW Sharpe Ratio of 2.16. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of EGGS and IVVW, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

EGGS vs. IVVW - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum EGGS drawdown since its inception was -18.52%, which is greater than IVVW's maximum drawdown of -16.79%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for EGGS and IVVW.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


EGGSIVVWDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-18.52%

-16.79%

-1.73%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-18.17%

-5.81%

-12.36%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-2.26%

-1.37%

-0.89%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-5.71%

-1.73%

-3.98%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

7.98%

1.09%

+6.89%

Volatility

EGGS vs. IVVW - Volatility Comparison

NestYield Total Return Guard ETF (EGGS) has a higher volatility of 10.61% compared to iShares S&P 500 BuyWrite ETF (IVVW) at 3.45%. This indicates that EGGS's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than IVVW based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


EGGSIVVWDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

10.61%

3.45%

+7.16%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

20.45%

6.91%

+13.54%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

25.04%

8.05%

+16.99%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

25.23%

12.69%

+12.54%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

25.23%

12.69%

+12.54%

EGGS vs. IVVW - Expense Ratio Comparison

EGGS has a 0.89% expense ratio, which is higher than IVVW's 0.25% expense ratio.


Dividends

EGGS vs. IVVW - Dividend Comparison

EGGS's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 14.71%, less than IVVW's 19.86% yield.


PositionTTM20252024
EGGS
NestYield Total Return Guard ETF
14.71%14.52%0.00%
IVVW
iShares S&P 500 BuyWrite ETF
19.86%18.55%13.72%

Frequently Asked Questions


EGGS and IVVW have a correlation of 0.56, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

EGGS has higher volatility (10.61%) compared to IVVW (3.45%). In terms of maximum drawdown, EGGS dropped -18.52% vs IVVW's -16.79%.

On 1-year performance, EGGS leads with 32.43% vs 17.28% for IVVW. On fees, IVVW is cheaper at 0.25% per year. On volatility, IVVW has been the lower-risk option at 3.45%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 1-year period, EGGS has performed better with a 32.43% return vs 17.28%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

IVVW is cheaper with a 0.25% expense ratio, compared with 0.89% for EGGS.

IVVW has the higher dividend yield at 19.86%, compared with 14.71% for EGGS.

They also come from different issuers: NestYield and iShares. Their fees differ too: 0.89% for EGGS and 0.25% for IVVW.

IVVW currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.16 vs 1.30), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for EGGS and IVVW

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer