EGGS vs. CWII

Last updated Jun 24, 2026

EGGS (NestYield Total Return Guard ETF) and CWII (REX CRWV Growth & Income ETF) are both Derivative Income funds. Both are actively managed. A 0.54 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. EGGS charges 0.89%/yr vs 1.03%/yr for CWII.

Performance

EGGS vs. CWII - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in NestYield Total Return Guard ETF (EGGS) and REX CRWV Growth & Income ETF (CWII). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, EGGS achieves a 23.37% return, which is significantly lower than CWII's 13,199.78% return.

EGGS

• 1D: -2.26%
• 1M: 9.06%
• YTD: 23.37%
• 6M: 21.02%
• 1Y: 32.43%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

CWII

• 1D: 0.00%
• 1M: 10,273.16%
• YTD: 13,199.78%
• 6M: 11,946.90%
• 1Y: —
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

EGGS vs. CWII - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025
EGGS NestYield Total Return Guard ETF	23.37%	-10.56%
CWII REX CRWV Growth & Income ETF	13,199.78%	-45.06%

Correlation

The correlation between EGGS and CWII is 0.54, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.

	Correlation
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 4, 2025	0.54

Return for Risk

EGGS vs. CWII — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

EGGS

EGGS Risk / Return Rank: 36
EGGS Sharpe Ratio Rank: 39
EGGS Sortino Ratio Rank: 36
EGGS Omega Ratio Rank: 39
EGGS Calmar Ratio Rank: 38
EGGS Martin Ratio Rank: 30

CWII

Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

EGGS vs. CWII - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for NestYield Total Return Guard ETF (EGGS) and REX CRWV Growth & Income ETF (CWII). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	EGGS	CWII	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	1.30	—	—
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	1.78	—	—
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.25	—	—
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	1.79	—	—
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	4.07	—	—

Drawdowns

EGGS vs. CWII - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum EGGS drawdown since its inception was -18.52%, smaller than the maximum CWII drawdown of -51.04%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for EGGS and CWII.

Drawdown Indicators

	EGGS	CWII	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-18.52%	-51.04%	+32.52%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-18.17%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-2.26%	0.00%	-2.26%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-5.71%	-33.26%	+27.55%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	7.98%	—	—

Volatility

Volatility by Period

	EGGS	CWII	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	10.61%	—	—
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	20.45%	—	—
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	25.04%	13,701.30%	-13,676.26%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	25.23%	13,701.30%	-13,676.07%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	25.23%	13,701.30%	-13,676.07%

EGGS vs. CWII - Expense Ratio Comparison

EGGS has a 0.89% expense ratio, which is lower than CWII's 1.03% expense ratio.

Dividends

EGGS vs. CWII - Dividend Comparison

EGGS's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 14.71%, less than CWII's 123.26% yield.

Position	TTM	2025
CWII REX CRWV Growth & Income ETF	123.26%	6.09%
EGGS NestYield Total Return Guard ETF	14.71%	14.52%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both EGGS and CWII in my portfolio?

EGGS and CWII have a correlation of 0.54, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which ETF is better, EGGS or CWII?

On fees, EGGS is cheaper at 0.89% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF is cheaper, EGGS or CWII?

EGGS is cheaper with a 0.89% expense ratio, compared with 1.03% for CWII.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, EGGS or CWII?

CWII has the higher dividend yield at 123.26%, compared with 14.71% for EGGS.

What is the main difference between EGGS and CWII?

They also come from different issuers: NestYield and REX Shares. Their fees differ too: 0.89% for EGGS and 1.03% for CWII.